[en] Aerodynamics has been an important research aspect in cycling science, with aerodynamic apparel
and equipment, athlete postures, and race strategies all taking advantage of scientific aerodynamics
knowledge. Crosswinds occur when cyclists travel at a non-zero angle to the direction of the wind.
Research into crosswinds has yielded race strategies for able-bodied cyclists such as staggered drafting,
and wind conditions are recognised as a key factor to consider for cyclist safety. The impact of crosswinds
on tandem para-cyclists is less understood. Within the tandem para-cycling discipline, two athletes
compete as a team on a single bicycle with a high degree of flow interaction between both athletes. Wind
tunnel experiments and computational fluid dynamics were utilised in this research to investigate the
drag and lateral forces at yaw angles between 0◦–20◦. No single turbulence model was found superior for
all yaw angles investigated, with the SST k-ω and k-kl-ω turbulence models providing good results for
separate yaw ranges. The individual drag and lateral forces experienced by both athletes and the tandem
bicycle were investigated to provide further clarity on the distribution of wind loads for each yaw angle
tested, and to aid in identifying potential locations for aerodynamic optimisation. 15◦ yaw was found to
be the critical yaw angle where the maximum drag area of 0.337 m2 was experienced. The lateral force
exceeded the drag force by 52.8% at a yaw angle of 20◦.
Andrianne, Thomas ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Interactions Fluide-Structure - Aérodynamique expérimentale
Blocken, Bert
Language :
English
Title :
On the effects of crosswinds in tandem aerodynamics: an experimental and a computational study
Blocken, B., Defraeye, T., Koninckx, E., Carmeliet, J., Hespel, P., CFD simulations of the aerodynamic drag of two drafting cyclists. Comput. & Fluids 71 (2013), 435–445, 10.1016/j.compfluid.2012.11.012.
Blocken, B., Toparlar, Y., Andrianne, T., Aerodynamic benefit for a cyclist by a following motorcycle. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 155 (2016), 1–10, 10.1016/j.jweia.2016.04.008.
Blocken, B., Druenen, T.van., Toparlar, Y., Malizia, F., Mannion, P., Andrianne, T., Marchal, T., Maas, GJ., Diepens, J., Aerodynamic drag in cycling pelotons: new insights by CFD simulation and wind tunnel testing. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 179:May (2018), 319–337, 10.1016/J.JWEIA.2018.06.011.
Fintelman, D.M., Sterling, M., Hemida, H., Li, F.-X., The effect of crosswinds on cyclists: an experimental study. The 2014 Conference of the International Sports Engineering Association, Procedia Eng., Vol. 72, 2014, 720–725, 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.06.122.
Fintelman, D.M., Sterling, M., Hemida, H., Li, F.-X., Optimal cycling time trial position models: Aerodynamics versus power output and metabolic energy. J. Biomech. 47:8 (2014), 1894–1898, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2014.02.029.
Fintelman, D.M., Hemida, H., Sterling, M., Li, F.-X., CFD simulations of the flow around a cyclist subjected to crosswinds. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 144 (2015), 31–41, 10.1016/j.jweia.2015.05.009.
Fintelman, D.M., Hemida, H., Sterling, M., Li, F.-X., The effect of time trial cycling position on physiological and aerodynamic variables. J. Sports Sci. 33:16 (2015), 1730–1737, 10.1080/02640414.2015.1009936.
Blocken, B., Toparlar, Y., A following car influences cyclist drag: CFD simulations and wind tunnel measurements. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 145 (2015), 178–186, 10.1016/j.jweia.2015.06.015.
Crouch, T.N., Burton, D., LaBry, Z.A., Blair, K.B., Riding against the wind: a review of competition cycling aerodynamics. Sports Eng. 20:2 (2017), 81–110, 10.1007/s12283-017-0234-1.
Crouch, T.N., Burton, D., Thompson, M.C., Brown, N.A.T., Sheridan, J., Dynamic leg-motion and its effect on the aerodynamic performance of cyclists. J. Fluids Struct. 65 (2016), 121–137, 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2016.05.007.
Mannion, P., Toparlar, Y., Blocken, B., Hajdukiewicz, M., Andrianne, T., Clifford, E., Improving CFD prediction of drag on Paralympic tandem athletes: Influence of grid resolution and turbulence model. Sports Eng. 21:2 (2018), 123–135, 10.1007/s12283-017-0258-6.
Mannion, P., Toparlar, Y., Blocken, B., Clifford, E., Andrianne, T., Hajdukiewicz, M., Aerodynamic drag in competitive tandem para-cycling: road race versus time-trial positions. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 179 (2018), 92–101, 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.05.011.
Lukes, R.a., Chin, S.B., Haake, S.J., The understanding and development of cycling aerodynamics. Sports Eng. 8 (2005), 59–74, 10.1007/BF02844004.
Barry, N., Burton, D., Sheridan, J., Thompson, M., Brown, N.A.T., Aerodynamic drag interactions between cyclists in a team pursuit. Sports Eng. 18 (2015), 93–103, 10.1007/s12283-015-0172-8.
Barry, N., Burton, D., Sheridan, J., Thompson, M., Brown, N.A.T., Aerodynamic performance and riding posture in road cycling and triathlon. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part P: J. Sports Eng. Technol. 229:1 (2015), 28–38, 10.1177/1754337114549876.
Defraeye, T., Blocken, B., Koninckx, E., Hespel, P., Carmeliet, J., Aerodynamic study of different cyclist positions: CFD analysis and full-scale wind-tunnel tests. J. Biomech. 43:7 (2010), 1262–1268, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.01.025.
Defraeye, T., Blocken, B., Koninckx, E., Hespel, P., Carmeliet, J., Computational fluid dynamics analysis of cyclist aerodynamics: Performance of different turbulence-modelling and boundary-layer modelling approaches. J. Biomech. 43:12 (2010), 2281–2287, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.04.038.
Jones, W.P., Launder, B.E., The prediction of laminarization with a two-equation model of turbulence. Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer 15:2 (1972), 301–314, 10.1016/0017-9310(72)90076-2.
Menter, F.R., Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J. 32:8 (1994), 1598–1605, 10.2514/3.12149.
Íñiguez-de-la Torre, A., Íñiguez, J., Aerodynamics of a cycling team in a time trial: does the cyclist at the front benefit?. Eur. J. Phys., 30(6), 2009, 1365.
Sumner, D., Two circular cylinders in cross-flow: A review. J. Fluids Struct. 26:6 (2010), 849–899, 10.1016/j.jfluidstructs.2010.07.001.
UCI. 2017. Cycling Regulations, Part 1 General Organisation of Cycling as a Sport, version on 26/07/2017. Union Cycliste Internationale. Retrieved from http://www.uci.ch/mm/Document/News/Rulesandregulation/18/30/80/1-GEN-20170726-EN_English.PDF.
Artec Europe. 2017. Artec Eva, 3D Scanners. Retrieved May 22, 2017, from https://www.artec3d.com/3d-scanner/artec-eva.
ATI Industrial Automation, 2018. F/T Sensor Delta. Retrieved April 4, 2018, from www.ati-ia.com/app_content/Documents/9230-05-1330.auto.pdf,.
Franke, J., Hellsten, A., Schlünzen, H., Carissimo, B., Best practice guideline for the CFD simulation of flows in the urban environment. COST Action 732: Quality Assurance and Improvement of Microscale Meteorological Models, 2007, Hamburg, Germany.
Tominaga, Y., Mochida, A., Yoshie, R., Kataoka, H., Nozu, T., Yoshikawa, M., Shirasawa, T., AIJ guidelines for practical applications of CFD to pedestrian wind environment around buildings. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 96:10–11 (2008), 1749–1761, 10.1016/j.jweia.2008.02.058.
ANSYS Fluent. ANSYS Fluent Theory Guide. Release 16.1 Documentation. 2015, ANSYS Inc.
Spalart, P., Allmaras, S., A one-equation turbulence model for aerodynamic flows. 30th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, 1992, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 10.2514/6.1992-439.
Walters, D.K., Cokljat, D., A three-equation eddy-viscosity model for Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes simulations of transitional flow. J. Fluids Eng., 130(12), 2008, 121401, 10.1115/1.2979230.
Menter, F.R., Langtry, R.B., Likki, S.R., Suzen, Y.B., Huang, P.G., Völker, S., A correlation-based transition model using local variables—Part I: model formulation. J. Turbomach. 128:3 (2006), 413–422, 10.1115/1.2184352.
Mannion, P., Toparlar, Y., Blocken, B., Clifford, E., Andrianne, T., Hajdukiewicz, M., Analysis of crosswind aerodynamics for competitive hand-cycling. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn. 180:August (2018), 182–190, 10.1016/j.jweia.2018.08.002.
Blocken, B., LES over RANS in building simulation for outdoor and indoor applications: A foregone conclusion?. Build. Simul. 11:5 (2018), 821–870, 10.1007/s12273-018-0459-3.