[en] INTRODUCTION: The Sarcopenia Quality of Life (SarQoL®) questionnaire was developed to provide a patient-reported outcome measure specific to sarcopenia. Its psychometric properties indicate that it is a valid and reliable instrument. However, until now, its ability to detect change over time has not been examined. Therefore, the objective of this study is to evaluate the responsiveness (also known as sensitivity to change) of the SarQoL® questionnaire in a prospective, longitudinal cohort of community-dwelling, older, sarcopenic subjects.
METHODS: Sarcopenic subjects from the SarcoPhAge (Sarcopenia and Physical impairment with advancing Age) study were included. Responsiveness was evaluated with nine pre-specified hypotheses on the correlation between the evolution of the SarQoL® scores after a 2-year interval and the evolution of the scores on the Short Form-36 (SF-36) and the Euroqol 5-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires. This technique considers responsiveness to be a form of longitudinal validity. Additionally, standardized response means were also calculated to compare the quantity of change measured by the different questionnaires.
RESULTS: A total of 42 sarcopenic subjects were included. The median age of the sample was 72.9 (68.9-78.8) years, 59.5% were female, and the mean body mass index was 23.3 (20.4-25.7) kg/m2. A good responsiveness was observed, as evidenced by the confirmation of eight out of nine hypotheses, well above the 75% confirmation threshold. The standardized response mean of the Overall SarQoL® score was significantly higher than those of the SF-36 Physical Component Summary (p = 0.005), the EQ-5D Utility Index (p < 0.001) and the Euroqol visual analogue scale (p = 0.003).
CONCLUSION: The first data available on the ability of the SarQoL® questionnaire to detect change over time indicates that the questionnaire has good responsiveness. This, together with the previously established psychometric properties, confirms that the SarQoL® questionnaire is a relevant instrument for the assessment of quality of life in sarcopenic populations.
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Geerinck, Anton ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Epidémiologie clinique
Bruyère, Olivier ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Locquet, Médéa ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Epidémiologie clinique
Reginster, Jean-Yves ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Beaudart, Charlotte ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Language :
English
Title :
Evaluation of the responsiveness of the SarQoL® questionnaire, a patient-reported outcome measure specific to sarcopenia.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM, et al. Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing. 2010;39:412–23
Cao L, Morley JE. Sarcopenia is recognized as an independent condition by an International Classification of Disease, tenth revision, clinical modification (ICD-10-CM) code. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016;17:675–7
Beaudart C, Zaaria M, Pasleau F, Reginster J-Y, Bruyère O. Health outcomes of sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0169548
Chang K-V, Hsu T-H, Wu W-T, Huang K-C, Han D-S. Is sarcopenia associated with depression? A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Age Ageing. 2017;46:738–46
Beaudart C, Reginster J-Y, Geerinck A, Locquet M, Bruyère O. Current review of the SarQoL®: a health-related quality of life questionnaire specific to sarcopenia. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2017;17:335–41
Rizzoli R, Reginster JY, Arnal JF, et al. Quality of life in sarcopenia and frailty. Calcif Tissue Int. 2013;93:101–20
Beaudart C, Biver E, Reginster J-Y, et al. Development of a self-administrated quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia in elderly subjects: the SarQoL. Age Ageing. 2015;44:960–6
Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–45
Guyatt GH, Kirshner B, Jaeschke R. Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:1341–5
Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171–8
Beaudart C, Biver E, Reginster J-Y, Rizzoli R, Rolland Y, Bautmans I, et al. Validation of the SarQoL, a specific health-related quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2017;8:238–44
Beaudart C, Edwards M, Moss C, et al. English translation and validation of the SarQoL®, a quality of life questionnaire specific for sarcopenia. Age Ageing. 2017;46:271–7
Ildiko GA, Mihai G, Beaudart C, et al. Psychometric performance of the Romanian version of the SarQoL®, a health-related quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12:103
Geerinck A, Scheppers A, Beaudart C, et al. Translation and validation of the Dutch SarQoL®, a quality of life questionnaire specific to sarcopenia. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. 2018. http://www.ismni.org/jmni/accepted/jmni_aa_BAUTMANS.pdf
Beaudart C, Reginster J-Y, Petermans J, et al. Quality of life and physical components linked to sarcopenia: the SarcoPhAge study. Exp Gerontol. 2015;69:103–10
Locquet M, Beaudart C, Bruyère O, Kanis JA, Delandsheere L, Reginster J-Y. Bone health assessment in older people with or without muscle health impairment. Osteoporos Int. 2018;29:1057–67
Beaudart C, Reginster J-Y, Petermans J, Bruyère O. Qualité de vie du patient sarcopénique: apport de l’étude liégeoise SarcoPhAge. Geriatr Psychol Neuropsychiatr Vieil. 2015;13:391–5
Locquet M, Beaudart C, Reginster J-Y, et al. Prevalence of concomitant bone and muscle wasting in elderly women from the SarcoPhAge cohort: preliminary results. J Frailty Aging. 2017;6:18–23
The SarQoL questionnaire [Internet]. http://www.sarqol.org. Accessed 7 Sep 2018
Ware JJ, Sherbourne C. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–83
Ware JJ, Konsinski M. SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales: a manual for users of version 1. Lincoln: QualityMetric; 2001
Laucis NC, Hays RD, Bhattacharyya T. Scoring the SF-36 in orthopaedics: a brief guide. J Bone Jt Surg. 2015;97:1628–34
Van Reenen M, Oppe M. EQ-5D-3L User guide. Basic information on how to use the EQ-5D-3L instrument. 2015. EuroQol Group. https://euroqol.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/EQ-5D-3L_UserGuide_2015.pdf
Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group. Ann Med. 2001;33:337–43
De Vet HCW, Knol DL, Terwee CB, Mokkink LB. Measurements in medicine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2011
De Boer M, Moll A, de Vet H, Terwee CB, Völker-Dieben HJM, van Rens GHMB. Psychometric properties of vision-related quality of life questionnaires: a systematic review. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2004;24:257–73
Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53:459–68
Middel B, Van Sonderen E. Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research. Int J Integr Care. 2002;2:e15
Cohen J. Quantitative methods in psychology. Psychol Bull. 1992;112:155–9
Bessette L, Sangha O, Kuntz K, et al. Comparative responsiveness of generic versus disease-specific and weighted versus unweighted health status measures in carpal tunnel syndrome. Med Care. 1998;36:491–502
Angst F, Verra ML, Lehmann S, Aeschlimann A. Responsiveness of five condition-specific and generic outcome assessment instruments for chronic pain. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:26
Evans JD. Straightforward statistics for the behavioral sciences. Pacific Grove: Brooks/Cole; 1996
Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*Power: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007;39:175–91
Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, Ostelo RWJG, Bouter LM, De Vet HCW. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–7
Buckinx F, Landi F, Cesari M, et al. Pitfalls in the measurement of muscle mass: a need for a reference standard. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2018;9:269–78
Reginster J-Y, Cooper C, Rizzoli R, et al. Recommendations for the conduct of clinical trials for drugs to treat or prevent sarcopenia. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2016;28:47–58
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
