[en] This study applied and evaluated the temporal change of the Distance to Nature index (D2N) for land use and cover monitoring in the Irati National Forest and its buffer zone (Southern Brazil) between 1986 and 2016. This study addressed the following questions: (1) Which land use dynamics were observed between 1986 and 2016 in the Irati National Forest and its buffer zone? (2) Is the analysis of D2N evolution relevant to assess landscape dynamics in protected areas and their buffer zones? The degree of naturalness decreased after 1986. Statistical analyses showed a significant difference in the D2N values between 1997 and all other years. We observed an increase of D2N values in the 30-year period. The spatial D2N trajectory map between 1986 and 2016 shows where the D2N values changed, and enables us to infer where the differences observed could compromise the ecological condition of the protected area and its buffer zone. The results demonstrate that an analysis by means of D2N can be an effective tool to monitor and assess anthropogenic influences on biodiversity in buffer zones around protected areas.
Disciplines :
Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Almeida, Dayana; Federal University of São Carlos
Andre, Marie ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Lepur(Centre rech.sur la Ville,le Territ.et le Milieu rural)
Scariot, Eliziane Carla; Federal Institute Catarinense (IFC)
Fushita, Angela Terumi; Federal University of São Carlos
dos Santos, José Eduardo; Federal University of São Carlos
Bogaert, Jan ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Biodiversité et Paysage
Language :
English
Title :
Temporal change of Distance to Nature index for anthropogenic influence monitoring in a protected area and its buffer zone
Almeida, D., Cenários para a biodiversidade de remanescentes florestais do entorno da Floresta Nacional de Irati. Unpublished doctoral thesis, 2017, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Anderson, M.J., A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol. 26 (2001), 32–46, 10.1046/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.x.
Anderson, M.J., Permanova: A Fortran Computer Program for Permutational Multivariate Analysis of Variance. 2005, Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland, 24.
André M. et al., in press. Quantification of anthropogenic effects in the landscape of Lubumbashi. In: Bogaert, J., Colinet, G., Mahy, G. (Eds.), Anthropisation Des Paysages Katangais. Presses agronomiques de Gembloux, Gembloux, Belgique. http://hdl.handle.net/2268/186226.
Andrew, H., Defries, R., Ecological mechanisms linking protected areas to surrounding lands. Ecol. Appl. 17:4 (2007), 974–988, 10.1890/05-1098.
Bogaert, J. et al., 2011. A methodological framework to quantify anthropogenic effects on landscape patterns. In: Hong, S.-K. et al. (eds.), Landscape Ecology in Asian Cultures, Ecological Research Monographs, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-87799-8_11.
Bogaert, J., et al. Anthropogenic effects in landscape: historical context and spatial pattern. Biocultural Landscapes, 2014, Elsevier, 218.
Brancalion, P.H.S., et al. A critical analysis of the Native Vegetation Protection Law of Brazil (2012): updates and ongoing initiatives. Natureza & Conservação 14 (2016), 1–15, 10.1016/j.ncon.2016.03.003.
Brasil, Lei n° 6.746, de 10 de dezembro de 1979: altera o disposto nos arts. 49 e 50 da Lei 4.504, de 30/11/1964 e dá outras providências (estatuto da terra). 1979, Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil de, 18673.
Brasil, 1993. Brazilian Federal Law n° 8.629, February 25th, 1993. ‘Dispõe sobre a regulamentação dos dispositivos constitucionais relativos à reforma agrária’. < http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/leis/L8629.htm>.
Brasil, Lei n° 9985, de 2000. Institui o Sistema Nacional de Unidades de Conservação da Natureza e dá outras providências. 2000, Diário Oficial da República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília de, 1.
Brasil, 2012. Brazilian Federal Law n° 12.651, May 25th, 2012. Forest Code. ‘Dispõe sobre a proteção da vegetação nativa’ http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2011-2014/2012/lei/l12651.htm.
Caviglione, J.H., Kiihl, L.R.B., Caramori, P.H., Oliveira, D., Cartas climáticas do Paraná. 2000, IAPAR, CD, Londrina.
Davis, C.R., Hansen, A.J., Trajectories in land use change around U.S. National Parks and challenges and opportunities for management. Ecol. Appl. 21 (2011), 3299–3316, 10.1890/10-2404.1.
Defries, R., et al. Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the last twenty years. Ecol. Appl. 15 (2005), 19–26, 10.1890/03-5258.
Gray, C.L., et al. Local biodiversity is higher inside than outside terrestrial protected areas worldwide. Nat. Commun., 7, 2016, 10.1038/ncomms12306.
Gurr, G.M., et al. Multi-country evidence that crop diversification promotes ecological intensification of agriculture. Nat. Plants, 2016, 10.1038/NPLANTS.2016.14.
Hong, S.K., Philosophy and background of biocultural landscapes. Biocultural Landscapes, 2014, Elsevier, 218.
Lira, P.K., et al. Land-use and land-cover change in Atlantic forest landscapes. For. Ecol. Manage. 278 (2012), 80–89.
Maack, R., Geografia física do Estado do Paraná. 3rd ed., 2002, Imprensa Oficial, Curitiba, 440.
Mairota, P., et al. Using landscape structure to develop quantitative baselines for protected area monitoring. Ecol. Indic. 33 (2012), 82–95, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.08.017.
Mazza, C.A.S., et al. Land use and environmental zoning of mixed ombrophilous forests for sustainable use (Irati National Forest, Brazil Southern Region). Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 59 (2016), 1–11, 10.1590/1678-4324-2016160058.
Moreira, M.A., Fundamentos do Sensoriamento Remoto e Metodologias de Aplicação. 4th ed., 2011, UFV, Brasil, 422.
Okuyama, K.K., et al. Adequação de propriedades rurais ao Código Florestal Brasileiro: estudo de caso no estado do Paraná. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 16:9 (2012), 1015–1021, 10.1590/S1415-43662012000900013.
Oliveira, S.N., et al. Deforestation analysis in protected areas and scenario simulation for structural corridors in the agricultural frontier of Western Bahia, Brazil. Land Use Policy 61 (2017), 40–52, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.10.046.
Perelló L.F.C., et al. Ecological, legal, and methodological principles for planning buffer zones. Natureza & Conservação 10:1 (2012), 3–11.
Rüdisser, J., et al. Distance to nature – a new biodiversity relevant environmental indicator set at the landscape level. Ecol. Indic. 15 (2012), 208–216, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.027.
Scherl, et al. As áreas protegidas podem contribuir para a redução da pobreza? Oportunidades e limitações. 2006, IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK, 60 https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/2004-047-Pt.pdf.
Wallace, G.N., et al. Planejamento da ocupação do solo e regulamentação para o entorno de unidades de conservação: Um estudo de marcos legais, melhores práticas e necessidades de capacitação no México e na América Central. Natureza & Conservação 3 (2005), 64–142.
Yu, C.M., Sistema Faxinal: uma forma de organização camponesa em desagregação no centro-sul do Paraná. 1988, Bol. Tec. IAPAR, Londrina, 123.
