Keywords :
ferromagnetism;finite element analysis;magnetic hysteresis;nonlinear differential equations;plasticity;variational techniques;approximated explicit solution;differential equation;differential forms;energy balance;energy-based ferromagnetic hysteresis model;finite element computations;magnetic material;nonlinear differential equation;plasticity;variational formulation;Computational modeling;Magnetic hysteresis;Magnetic separation;Mathematical model;Reactive power;Saturation magnetization;Tensile stress;Finite element analysis;Magnetic hysteresis
Abstract :
[en] This paper compares two implementations of an energy-based ferromagnetic hysteresis model for finite element computations. The first implementation is an approximated explicit solution of the non-linear differential equation that is obtained from the energy balance of the magnetic material. The second implementation borrows from the theory of plasticity a variational formulation to solve exactly this differential equation. Both implementations are quantitatively compared in terms of accuracy and computational cost. The differential approach turns out to be much faster than the variational one and to give in most situations a result very close to that of the exact variational approach.
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0