Article (Scientific journals)
Individual identification and marking techniques for zebrafish
Delcourt, Johann; Ovidio, Michaël; Denoël, Mathieu et al.
2018In Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 28 (4), p. 839-864
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Rev_Fish_Biol_Fisheries_2018_Author_version.pdf
Author preprint (2.45 MB)
This is the pdf of the author version of the paper available in open access
Download
Full Text Parts
Rev_Fish_Biol_Fisheries_2018.pdf
Publisher postprint (10.07 MB)
This is the pdf of the published version of the paper
Request a copy

This paper is published by Springer Nature and is also available in its definitive version on Springer website (see DOI link).


All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Individual identification; ID; PIT-tagging; RFID; Microchips; Review; Patterns; Zebrafish; Protocols; PIT tags; Passive Integrated transponders; Zebra fish; Danio rerio; Methodology; Procedures; Guidelines; Marking
Abstract :
[en] In laboratory fish research, the zebrafish Danio rerio (Cyprinidae) represents the equivalent of the mouse in mammalian research. This species has become a major model for studies in developmental and behavioural genetics, neurophysiology, biomedicine, ecotoxicology, and behavioural and evolutionary ecology. To meet the need for accurate and reproducible data in both fundamental and applied sciences, it is of primary importance to be able to tag and/or recognize individual zebrafish. However, classic methods used in fish ecology and aquaculture are generally difficult to apply to such small fish. Recently, various new tagging methods have been developed. This paper presents a first review of current identification and marking methods applied to zebrafish, from external observation methods (such as skin pattern recognition, fin clipping, scale regeneration, colour and transgenic methods) to the most advanced technological developments in electronic (low- and high- radio-frequencies PIT tags, microchip) and image analysis methods (video tracking). This review aims to help researchers and zebrafish facility managers select the identification method (ID) best adapted to their needs. The main characteristics of each ID method are examined (including detection range, durability, speed and repetitiveness, ID code combination, size dependence and ethical considerations), and their pros and cons are summarized in a decision table to help select the most appropriate option for a research or management program. Finally, contextual applications of these ID methods and future developments are discussed.
Research center :
FOCUS - Freshwater and OCeanic science Unit of reSearch - ULiège
Disciplines :
Environmental sciences & ecology
Animal psychology, ethology & psychobiology
Life sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Aquatic sciences & oceanology
Zoology
Author, co-author :
Delcourt, Johann  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution
Ovidio, Michaël  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Laboratoire de Démographie des poissons et hydroécologie
Denoël, Mathieu  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Biologie du comportement - Ethologie et psychologie animale
Muller, Marc  ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la vie > GIGA-R : Biologie et génétique moléculaire
Pendeville-Samain, Hélène ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > GIGA-Research
Deneubourg, Jean-Louis;  Université Libre de Bruxelles - ULB
Poncin, Pascal ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Biologie du comportement - Ethologie et psychologie animale
Language :
English
Title :
Individual identification and marking techniques for zebrafish
Publication date :
December 2018
Journal title :
Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries
ISSN :
0960-3166
eISSN :
1573-5184
Publisher :
Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands
Volume :
28
Issue :
4
Pages :
839-864
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique [BE]
Available on ORBi :
since 10 September 2018

Statistics


Number of views
359 (87 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
566 (11 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
20
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
19
OpenCitations
 
15

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi