patient care team; general practitioner; interface primary/secondary care; interdisciplinary communication; medical oncology
Abstract :
[en] Cancer care has become complex, requiring healthcare professionals to collaborate to provide high-quality care. Multidisciplinary oncological team (MDT) meetings in the hospital have been implemented to coordinate individual cancer patients' care. General practitioners (GPs) are invited to join, but their participation is minimal.
OBJECTIVES:
Aim of this study is to explore participating GPs' perceptions of their current role and to understand their preferences towards effective role execution during MDT meetings.
METHODS:
In May to June 2014, semi-structured interviews (n = 16) were conducted involving GPs with MDT experience in Belgium. The analysis was done according to qualitative content analysis principles.
RESULTS:
Attendance of an MDT meeting is perceived as part of the GP's work, especially for complex patient care situations. Interprofessional collaborative relationships and the GP's perceived benefit to the MDT meeting discussions are important motivators to participate. Enhanced continuity of information flow and optimized organizational time management were practical aspects triggering the GP's intention to participate. GPs valued the communication with the patient before and after the meeting as an integral part of the MDT dynamics.
CONCLUSION:
GPs perceive attendance of the MDT meeting as an integral part of their job. Suggestions are made to enhance the efficiency of the meetings.
Disciplines :
Public health, health care sciences & services General & internal medicine Oncology
Author, co-author :
Pype, Peter; Universiteit Gent - Ugent > Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare
Mertens, Fyne; Universiteit Gent - Ugent > Department of Family Medicine and Primary HealthCare
Belche, Jean Luc ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Médecine générale
Duchesnes, Christiane ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Médecine générale
Kohn, Laurence; Belgian HealthCare Knowledge Center (KCE) Brussels
Sercu, Marij; Universiteit Gent - Ugent > Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare
Deveugele, Myriam; Universiteit Gent - Ugent > Department of Family Medicine and Primary Healthcare
Language :
English
Title :
Experiences of hospital-based multidisciplinary team meetings in oncology: An interview study among participating general practitioners.
Borras JM, Albrecht T, Audisio R, et al. Policy statement on multidisciplinary cancer care. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50:475-480.
Saini KS, Taylor C, Ramirez AJ, et al. Role of the multidisciplinary team in breast cancer management: results from a large international survey involving 39 countries. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:853-859.
Kesson EM, Allardice GM, George WD, et al. Effects of multidisciplinary team working on breast cancer survival: retrospective, comparative, interventional cohort study of 13 722 women. Br Med J. 2012;344:e2718.
MacDermid E, Hooton G, MacDonald M, et al. Improving patient survival with the colorectal cancer multi-disciplinary team. Colorectal Dis. 2009;11:291-295.
Fleissig A, Jenkins V, Catt S, et al. Multidisciplinary teams in cancer care: are they effective in the UK? Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:935-943.
Vrijens F, Kohn L, Dubois C, et al. Ten years of multidisciplinary team meetings in oncology: current situation and perspectives. Health Services Research (HSR), Brussels: Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE); 2015. (KCE Reports 239Cs. D/2015/10.273/21).
Kane B, Luz S, O’briain DS, et al. Multidisciplinary team meetings and their impact on workflow in radiology and pathology departments. BMC Med. 2007;5:15.
Lamb BW, Brown KF, Nagpal K, et al. Quality of care management decisions by multidisciplinary cancer teams: a systematic review. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011;18:2116-2125.
Walsh J, Harrison JD, Young JM, et al. What are the current barriers to effective cancer care coordination? A qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2010;10:132.
Hong NJL, Wright FC, Gagliardi AR, et al. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: exploring the attitudes of cancer care providers and administrators. J Interprof Care. 2009;23:599-610.
Lamb BW, Sevdalis N, Arora S, et al. Teamwork and team decision-making at multidisciplinary cancer conferences: barriers, facilitators, and opportunities for improvement. World J Surg. 2011;35:1970-1976.
Aubin M, Vezina L, Verreault R, et al. Patient, primary care physician and specialist expectations of primary care physician involvement in cancer care. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:8-15.
Dahlhaus A, Vanneman N, Guethlin C, et al. German general practitioners’ views on their involvement and role in cancer care: a qualitative study. Fam Pract. 2014;31:209-214.
Geelen E, Krumeich A, Schellevis FG, et al. General practitioners’ perceptions of their role in cancer follow-up care: a qualitative study in the Netherlands. Eur J Gen Pract. 2014;20:17-24.
Sturmberg JP, Martin CM, Katerndahl DA. Systems and complexity thinking in the general practice literature: an integrative, historical narrative review. Ann Fam Med. 2014;12:66-74.
Hjortdahl P. Continuity of care: general practitioners’ knowledge about, and sense of responsibility toward their patients. Fam Pract. 1992;9:3-8.
Haggerty JL, Reid RJ, Freeman GK, et al. Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary review. BMJ. 2003;327:1219-1221.
Häyrinen K, Saranto K, Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77:291-304.
Hall SJ, Samuel LM, Murchiea P. Toward shared care for people with cancer: developing the model with patients and GPs. Fam Pract. 2011;28:554-564.
Roorda C, de Bock GH, van der Veen WJ, et al. Role of the general practitioner during the active breast cancer treatment phase: an analysis of health care use. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:705-714.
Kane B, Luz S. Do no harm: fortifying MDT collaboration in changing technological times. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82:613-625.
Gilbert J, Yan J, Hoffman S. A WHO report: framework for action on interprofessional education and collaborative practice. J Allied Health. 2010;39(Suppl 1):196-197.
Reeves S, Perrier L, Goldman J, et al. Interprofessional education: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes (update). Cochrane DB Syst Rev. 2013:CD002213.
Gittell JH, Godfrey M, Thistlethwaite J. Interprofessional collaborative practice and relational coordination: improving healthcare through relationships. J Interprof Care. 2013;27:210-213.
Devitt B, Philip J, McLachlan SA. Team dynamics, decision making, and attitudes toward multidisciplinary cancer meetings: health professionals’ perspectives. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6:e17-e20.
Penel N, Valentin F, Giscard S, et al. General practitioners assessment of a structured report on medical decision making by a regional multidisciplinary cancer committee. Bull Cancer. 2007;94:E23-E26.
Debono D. Coping with the oncology workforce shortage: transitioning oncology follow-up care to primary care providers. J Oncol Pract. 2010;6:203-205.
Berendsen AJ, Kuiken A, Benneker WH, et al. How do general practitioners and specialists value their mutual communication? A survey. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:143.
Valentijn PP, Schepman SM, Opheij W, et al. Understanding integrated care: a comprehensive conceptual framework based on the integrative functions of primary care. Int J Integr Care. 2013;13:e010