Reference : Aerodynamic analysis of different cyclist hill descent positions
Scientific journals : Article
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences : Physics
Engineering, computing & technology : Mechanical engineering
Engineering, computing & technology : Aerospace & aeronautics engineering
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/227380
Aerodynamic analysis of different cyclist hill descent positions
English
Blocken, Bert [> >]
van Druenen, Thijs [> >]
Toparlar, Yasin [> >]
Andrianne, Thomas mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département d'aérospatiale et mécanique > Interactions Fluide-Structure - Aérodynamique expérimentale >]
Oct-2018
Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Elsevier
181
27-45
Yes (verified by ORBi)
0167-6105
1872-8197
Netherlands
[en] Cycling position ; Computational Fluid Dynamics ; Wind Tunnel ; Drag ; Numerical simulation ; Aerodynamics
[en] Different professional cyclists use very different hill descent positions, which indicates that prior to the present
study, there was no consensus on which position is really superior, and that most cyclists did not test different
positions, for example in wind tunnels, to find which position would give them the largest advantage. This paper
presents an aerodynamic analysis of 15 different hill descent positions. It is assumed that the hill slope is steep
enough so pedaling is not required to gain speed and that the descent does not include sharp bends necessitating
changes in position. The analysis is performed by Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations with the 3D
RANS equations and the Transition SST k-ω model. The simulations are validated wind tunnel measurements. The
results are analyzed in terms of frontal area, drag area and surface pressure coefficient. It is shown that the
infamous “Froome” position during the Peyresourde descent of Stage 8 of the 2016 Tour de France is not aerodynamically
superior to several other positions. Other positions are up to 7.2% faster and also safer because they
provide more equal distribution of body weight over both wheels. Also several positions that allow larger power
generation are aerodynamically superior.
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students ; General public
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/227380
10.1016/j.jweia.2018.08.010

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Restricted access
2018_JWEIAg.pdfPublisher postprint12.9 MBRequest copy

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.