Article (Scientific journals)
Clinical monitoring of cardiac output assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography in anaesthetised dogs: a comparison with the thermodilution technique
Mantovani, MM; Fantoni, DT; Gimenes, AM et al.
2017In BMC Veterinary Research, 13 (1), p. 325
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
2017_Mantovani et al - Clinical monitoring of cardiac output assessed by transesophageal echocardiography in dogs.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.44 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: Cardiac output (CO) is an important haemodynamic parameter to monitor in patients during surgery. However, the majority of the techniques for measuring CO have a limited application in veterinary practice due to their invasive approach and associated complexity and risks. Transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a technique used to monitor cardiac function in human patients during surgical procedures and allows CO to be measured non-invasively. This prospective clinical study aimed to compare the transoesophageal echocardiography using a transgastric view of the left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) and the thermodilution (TD) technique for the assessment of CO during mean arterial pressure of 65-80 mmHg (normotension) and <65 mmHg (hypotension) in dogs undergoing elective surgery. Eight dogs were pre-medicated with acepromazine (0.05 mg/kg, IM), tramadol (4 mg/kg, IM) and atropine (0.03 mg/kg, IM), followed by anaesthetic induction with propofol (3-5 mg/kg IV) and maintenance with isoflurane associated with a continuous infusion rate of fentanyl (bolus of 3 μg/kg followed by 0.3 μg/kg/min). The CO was measured by TEE (COTEE) and TD (COTD) at the end of expiration during normotension and hypotension (induced by isoflurane). RESULTS: There was a strong positive correlation between COTEE and COTD ​​(r = 0.925; P < 0.0001). The bias between COTD and COTEE was 0.14 ± 0.29 L/min (limits of agreement, -0.44 to 0.72 L/min). The percentage error of CO measured by the two methods was 12.32%. In addition, a strong positive correlation was found between COTEE and COTD during normotension (r = 0.995; P < 0.0001) and hypotension (r = 0.78; P = 0.0223). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated that the transgastric view of the LVOT by TEE was a minimally invasive alternative to clinically monitoring CO in dogs during anaesthesia. However, during hypotension, the CO obtained by TEE was less reliable, although still acceptable.
Disciplines :
Veterinary medicine & animal health
Author, co-author :
Mantovani, MM
Fantoni, DT
Gimenes, AM
Castro, JR
Flor, BP
Ida, Keila ;  Université de Liège - ULiège > Dép. clinique des animaux de compagnie et des équidés (DCA) > Anesthésiologie et réanimation vétérinaires
Schwartz, DS
Language :
English
Title :
Clinical monitoring of cardiac output assessed by transoesophageal echocardiography in anaesthetised dogs: a comparison with the thermodilution technique
Publication date :
2017
Journal title :
BMC Veterinary Research
eISSN :
1746-6148
Publisher :
BioMed Central, United Kingdom
Volume :
13
Issue :
1
Pages :
325
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 20 June 2018

Statistics


Number of views
59 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
0 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
13
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
11
OpenCitations
 
7

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi