[en] INTRODUCTION: The reinsertion of an infected implant when peri-prosthetic infection occurs early after breast augmentation or breast reconstruction remains controversial. In this experimental study, the authors tried to remove bacteria, and their biofilm, from the colonized surface of breast prostheses, without damaging their integrity.
MATERIALS AND METHODS:
A total of 112 shell samples of silicone breast prostheses, smooth (SPSS) and textured (TPSS), were colonized by S. epidermidis (SE) or S. aureus (SA) strains, all able to produce biofilms. After 15 days, all the samples were removed from the contaminated culture broth and constituted 4 groups of 20 contaminated samples: SPSS/SE (group I), SPSS/SA (group II), TPSS/SE (group III), TPSS/SE (group IV). In another group-group SEM-, 16 colonized samples were used for documentation with scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The remaining 16 samples were used to test the limits of detection of the sterility test. All samples of groups I-IV and 8 samples of group SEM were « washed » with a smooth brush in a povidone-iodine bath and rinsed with saline solution. A subset of the washed samples was sent for SEM and the others were immersed in sterile broth and were incubated at 35 °C for 3 weeks (groups I-IV).
RESULTS:
Fifteen days after contamination, all the samples in groups I-IV were colonized. In the SEM group, SEM images attested to the presence of bacteria in biofilm attached to the shells. After cleaning, SEM did not reveal any bacteria and there was no visible alteration in the outer structure of the shell. Sterility tests performed after decontamination in groups I-IV remained negative for all the samples.
CONCLUSION:
Breast prostheses recently contaminated with Staphylococci, frequently involved in peri-prosthetic breast implant infection and capable of producing biofilms, can be efficiently decontaminated by the procedure used in this study. Our decontamination procedure did not alter the surface structure of the prostheses. This decontamination procedure could allow reinsertion of an infected implant when peri-prosthetic infection occurs early after breast augmentation or breast reconstruction and when a salvage procedure is indicated.
Disciplines :
Laboratory medicine & medical technology Immunology & infectious disease Surgery
Author, co-author :
CASTUS, Pascal
HEYMANS, Olivier
MELIN, Pierrette ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service de microbiologie clinique
RENWART, Ludovic ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service de chirurgie plastique et maxillo-faciale
Henrist, Catherine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de chimie (sciences) > LCIS - GreenMAT
HAYTON, E.
MORDON, S.
LECLERE, F.M.
Language :
English
Title :
Is Salvage of Recently Infected Breast Implant After Breast Augmentation or Reconstruction Possible? An Experimental Study.
Araco A, Gravante G, Araco F, Delogu D, Cervelli V, Walgenbach K (2007) Infections of breast implants in aesthetic breast augmentations: a single-center review of 3,002 patients. Aesthet Plast Surg 31:325–329
Pittet B, Montandon D, Pittet D (2005) Infection in breast implants. Lancet Infect Dis 5:94–106
Brown SL, Hefflin B, Woo EK, Parmentier CM (2001) Infections related to breast implants reported to the Food and Drug Administration, 1977–1997. J Long Term Eff Med Implants 11:1–12
Barbieri R, Pesce M, Franchelli S, Baldelli I, De Maria A, Marchese A (2015) Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of Staphylococci causing breast peri-implant infections in oncologic patients. BMC Microbiol 15:26
Courtiss EH, Goldwyn RM, Anastasi GW (1979) The fate of breast implants with infection around them. Plast Reconstr Surg 63:812–816
Henderson JR, Kandola S, Hignett SP, Teasdale RL, Topps AR, Pennick M, Hwang M, Barnes N, Kirwan CC (2017) Infection prophylaxis for breast implant surgery: could we do better? Eplasty 14:17–19
Lohmeyer JA, Alawadi M, Bergmann PA, Schmauss D, Wittig KS (2017) Adequate antibiotic prophylaxis and therapy of periprosthetic infections of the breast—review of 468 consecutive implant removals. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 49:91–102
Hart A, Desai K, Yoo J, Losken A (2017) Incidence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carrier status in patients undergoing post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. Aesthet Surg J 37:35–43
Sanger JR, Sheth NK, Franson TR (1990) Adherence of microorganisms to breast prostheses: an in vitro study. Ann Plast Surg 22:337–342
Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O’Fallon WM, Beard CM, Kurland LT, Melton LJ III (1997) Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med 336:677–682
Darouiche RO (2004) Treatment of infections associated with surgical implants. N Engl J Med 350:1422–1429
Chun JK, Chulman MR (2007) The infected breast prosthesis after mastectomy reconstruction: successful salvage of nine implants in eight consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 120:581–589
Planas J, Car bonell A, Planas J (1995) Salvaging the exposed mammary prosthesis. Aesthet Plast Surg 19:535–540
Sherif RD, Ingargiola M, Sanati-Mehrizy P, Torina PJ, Harmaty MA (2017) Use of antibiotic beads to salvage infected breast implants. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg Epub May 22
Reish RG, Damjanovic B, Austen WG Jr, Winograd J, Liao EC, Cetrulo CL, Balkin DM, Colwell AS (2013) Infection following implant-based reconstruction in 1952 consecutive breast reconstructions: salvage rates and predictors of success. Plast Reconstr Surg 131:1223–1230
Agarwal S, Ettinger RE, Kung TA, Kozlow JH, Brown DL (2017) Cohort study of immediate implant exchange during acute infection in the setting of breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 70:865–870
De Lorenzi C (2005) Successful treatment of acute periprosthetic breast infection with curettage, pulse lavage, and immediate device exchange. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:400–403
Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Bisno AL, Beachey EH (1983) Experimental foreign body infections in mice challenged with slime-producing Staphylococcus Epidermidis. Infect Immun 40:407–410
Davies DG, Geesey GG (1995) Regulation of the alginate biosynthesis gene algC in Pseudomonas aeruginosa during biofilm development in continuous culture. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:860–865
Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP (1999) Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistant infections. Science 284:1318–1322
Burkhardt BR (2004) Detection of subclinical infections in significant breast implant capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:448
Netscher DT (2004) Subclinical infection as a possible cause of significant breast capsules. Plast Reconstr Surg 113:2229–2230
Costerton JW, Lewandowski Z, Caldwell DE, Korber DR, Lappin-Scott HM (1995) Microbial biofilms. Annu Rev Microbiol 49:711–745
Kunisada T, Yamada K, Oda S, Hara O (1997) Investigation on the efficacy of povidone-iodine against antiseptic-resistant species. Dermatology 195:14–18
Zambacos GJ, Nguyen D, Morris RJ (2004) Effect of povidone iodine on silicone gel breast implants in vitro: implications for clinical practice. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:706–710
Bernardi C, Saccomanno F (1998) Late Klebsiella pneumoniae infection following breast augmentation: case report. Aesthet Plast Surg 22:222–224
Marchese A, Barbieri R, Pesce M, Franchelli S, De Maria A (2016) Breast implant infection due to Paenibacillus residui in a cancer patient. Clin Microbiol Infect 22:743–744
Brickman M, Parsa AA, Parsa FD (2005) Mycobacterium cheloneae infection after breast augmentation. Aesthet Plast Surg 29:116–118
Lenne A, Defourny L, Lafosse A, Martin M, Vandercam B, Berlière M, Lengelé B, Rodriguez-Villalobos H (2016) Breast prosthesis infection and pets: a case report and review of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 22:98–100