[en] We study analytically the non-Markovianity of a spin ensemble, with arbitrary number of spins and spin quantum number, undergoing a pure dephasing dynamics. The system is considered as a part of a larger spin ensemble of any geometry with pairwise interactions. We derive exact formulas for the reduced dynamics of the system and for its non-Markovianity as assessed by the witness of Lorenzo et al. [Phys. Rev. A 88, 020102(R) (2013)]. The non-Markovianity is further investigated in the thermodynamic limit when the environment’s size goes to infinity. In this limit and for finite-size systems, we find that the Markovian’s character of the system’s dynamics crucially depends on the range of the interactions. We also show that, when the system and its environment are initially in a product state, the appearance of non-Markovianity is independent of the entanglement generation between the system and its environment.
Disciplines :
Physique
Auteur, co-auteur :
Dubertrand, Rémy ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de physique > Optique quantique
Cesa, Alexandre ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de physique > Optique quantique
Martin, John ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de physique > Optique quantique
Langue du document :
Anglais
Titre :
Analytical results for the quantum non-Markovianity of spin ensembles undergoing pure dephasing dynamics
Date de publication/diffusion :
juin 2018
Titre du périodique :
Physical Review. A, Atomic, molecular, and optical physics
E. Joos, H. D. Zeh, C. Kiefer, D. Giulini, J. Kupsch, and I.-O. Stamatescu, Decoherence and the Appearance of a Classical World in Quantum Theory (Springer, Berlin, 2003).
W. H. Zurek, Phys. Today 44 (10), 36 (1991). PHTOAD 0031-9228 10.1063/1.881293
K. Yosida, Phys. Rev. 106, 893 (1957). PHRVAO 0031-899X 10.1103/PhysRev.106.893
L. R. Walker and R. E. Walstedt, Phys. Rev. B 22, 3816 (1980). PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.22.3816
P. Häussler, Phys. Rep. 222, 65 (1992). PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/0370-1573(92)90018-U
L. Béguin, A. Vernier, R. Chicireanu, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 263201 (2013). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.263201
D. Barredo, S. Ravets, H. Labuhn, L. Béguin, A. Vernier, F. Nogrette, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 183002 (2014). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.183002
M. Saffman, T. G. Walker, and K. Mølmer, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 2313 (2010). RMPHAT 0034-6861 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.2313
H. G. Katzgraber and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 67, 134410 (2003). PRBMDO 0163-1829 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.134410
A. C. Neto, G. Karpat, and F. F. Fanchini, Phys. Rev. A 94, 032105 (2016). 2469-9926 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.032105
E. Andersson, J. D. Cresser, and M. J. W. Hall, J. Mod. Opt. 54, 1695 (2007). JMOPEW 0950-0340 10.1080/09500340701352581
M. J. W. Hall, J. D. Cresser, L. Li, and E. Andersson, Phys. Rev. A 89, 042120 (2014). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.89.042120
R. A. Horn and C. R. Johnson, Matrix Analysis (Cambridge University, New York, 1990).
H. Ollivier and W. H. Zurek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88, 017901 (2001). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.017901
L. Henderson and V. Vedral, J. Phys. A 34, 6899 (2001). JPHAC5 0305-4470 10.1088/0305-4470/34/35/315
K. Roszak and Ł. Cywiński, Phys. Rev. A 92, 032310 (2015). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.032310
K. Roszak and Ł. Cywiński, Phys. Rev. A 97, 012306 (2018). 2469-9926 10.1103/PhysRevA.97.012306
A. Peres, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1413 (1996). PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413
M. Horodecki, P. Horodecki, and R. Horodecki, Phys. Lett. A 223, 1 (1996). PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(96)00706-2
I. García-Mata, C. Pineda, and D. Wisniacki, Phys. Rev. A 86, 022114 (2012). PLRAAN 1050-2947 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.022114
D. Davalos and C. Pineda, Phys. Rev. A 96, 062127 (2017). 2469-9926 10.1103/PhysRevA.96.062127
C. Navarrete-Benlloch, I. de Vega, D. Porras, and J. I. Cirac, New J. Phys. 13, 023024 (2011). NJOPFM 1367-2630 10.1088/1367-2630/13/2/023024
