Buckinx, Fanny ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Bornheim, Stephen ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Kinésithérapie générale et réadaptation
Remy, Gaël; Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Sciences, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium
Van Beveren, Julien; Haute Ecole de la ville de Liège, Liège, Belgium
Reginster, Jean-Yves ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Bruyère, Olivier ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Dardenne, Nadia ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Biostatistique
Kaux, Jean-François ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la motricité > Médecine physique, réadaptation et traumatologie du sport
Language :
English
Title :
French translation and validation of the “Anterior Knee Pain Scale” (AKPS)
Publication date :
May 2019
Journal title :
Disability and Rehabilitation
ISSN :
0963-8288
eISSN :
1464-5165
Publisher :
Taylor and Francis Ltd
Volume :
41
Issue :
9
Pages :
1089-1094
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Commentary :
Implications for rehabilitation
- The results on psychometric properties of the French Anterior Knee Pain Scale are comparable with six validated versions obtained for the Finnish, the Turkish, the Chinese, the Dutch, the Thai and the Persian populations.
- The French translated version of the Anterior Knee Pain Scale is a reliable and valid instrument for assessing the functional limitations associated with patellofemoral pain.
- The test–retest reliability of the French Anterior Knee Pain Scale was excellent, the internal consistency was high and the construct validity was consistent. There were no floor/ceiling effects.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Glaviano NR, Kew M, Hart JM, et al. Demographic and epidemiological trends in patellofemoral pain. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10:281–290.
Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–3191.
Taunton JE, Ryan MB, Clement DB, et al. A retrospective case-control analysis of 2002 running injuries. Br J Sports Med. 2002;36:95–101.
Thomee P, Thomee R, Karlsson J., Patellofemoral pain syndrome: pain, coping strategies and degree of well-being. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2002;12:276–281.
Blond L, Hansen L., Patellofemoral pain syndrome in athletes: a 5.7-year retrospective follow-up study of 250 athletes. Acta Orthop Belg. 1998;64:393–400.
Collins NJ, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Crossley KM, et al. Prognostic factors for patellofemoral pain: a multicentre observational analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2013;47:227–233.
Thomas MJ, Wood L, Selfe J, et al. Anterior knee pain in younger adults as a precursor to subsequent patellofemoral osteoarthritis: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010;11:201.
Bolgla LA, Boling MC., An update for the conservative management of patellofemoral pain syndrome: a systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2010. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2011;6:112–125.
Witvrouw E, Callaghan MJ, Stefanik JJ, et al. Patellofemoral pain: consensus statement from the 3rd international patellofemoral pain research retreat held in Vancouver, September 2013. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48:411–414.
Baker MM, Juhn MS., Patellofemoral pain syndrome in the female athlete. Clin Sports Med. 2000;19:315–329.
Cheung RT, Ngai SP, Lam PL, et al. Chinese translation and validation of the Kujala scale for patients with patellofemoral pain. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:510–513.
Fermanian J., [Validation of assessment scales in physical medicine and rehabilitation: how are psychometric properties determined?]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2005;48:281–287.
Garratt AM, Brealey S, Gillespie WJ., Patient-assessed health instruments for the knee: a structured review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2004;43:1414–1423.
Kievit AJ, Breugem SJ, Sierevelt IN, et al. Dutch translation of the Kujala Anterior Knee Pain Scale and validation in patients after knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013;21:2647–2653.
Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, et al. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:159–163.
Kuru T, Dereli EE, Yaliman A., Validity of the Turkish version of the Kujala patellofemoral score in patellofemoral pain syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2010;44:152–156.
Leplege A, Ecosse E, Verdier A, et al. The French SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation and preliminary psychometric evaluation. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1013–1023.
Negahban H, Pouretezad M, Yazdi MJ, et al. Persian translation and validation of the Kujala Patellofemoral Scale in patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:2259–2263.
Petersen W, Ellermann A, Gosele-Koppenburg A, et al. Patellofemoral pain syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014;22:2264–2274.
Roy JS, Esculier JF, Maltais DB., Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:614–623.
Sakunkaruna S, Sakunkaruna Y, Sakulsriprasert P., Thai version of the kujala patellofemoral questionnaire in knee pain patients: cross-cultural validation and test-retest reliability. J Med Assoc Thai. 2015;98 Suppl 5:S81–S85.
da Silva Aquino V, Falcon SFM, Neves LMT, et al. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the scoring of patellofemoral disorders into Portuguese: preliminary study. Acta Ortop Bras. 2011;19:273–279.
Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
Ware JE, Jr, Sherbourne CD., The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.
Weir JP., Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. J Strength Condition Res. 2005;19:231–240.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.