Reference : Antarctic environmental protection: strengthening the links between science and governance
Scientific journals : Article
Law, criminology & political science : Multidisciplinary, general & others
Law, criminology & political science : Political science, public administration & international relations
Life sciences : Environmental sciences & ecology
Antarctic environmental protection: strengthening the links between science and governance
[fr] la protection de l'environnement antarctique : renforcer les liens entre science et gouvernance
Hughes, Kevin []
Constable, Andrew []
Frenot, Yves []
Lopez-Martinez, Jeronimo []
McIvor, Ewan []
Njåstad, Birgit []
Terauds, Alex []
Liggett, Daniela []
Roldan, Gabriela []
Wilmotte, Annick mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la vie > Physiologie et génétique bactériennes >]
Xavier, José C. []
Environmental Science and Policy
Yes (verified by ORBi)
[en] Antarctic ; environmental protection ; science-base ; policy ; communication ; conservation ; human impact ; legislation ; Antarctic Treaty area
[en] The Antarctic has significant environmental, scientific, historic, and intrinsic values, all of which are worth protecting into the future. Nevertheless, the area is subject to an increasing level and diversity of human activities that may impact these values within marine, terrestrial and cryosphere environments. Threats to the Antarctic environment, and to the aforementioned values, include climate change, pollution, habitat destruction, wildlife disturbance and non-native species introductions. Over time, a suite of legally binding international agreements, which form part of the Antarctic Treaty System (ATS), has been established to help safeguard the Antarctic environment and provide a framework for addressing the challenges arising from these threats. Foremost among these agreements are the Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty and the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources. Many scientists working in Antarctica undertake research that is relevant to Antarctic environmental policy development. More effective two-way interaction between scientists and those responsible for policy development would further strengthen the governance framework, including by (a) better communication of policy makers’ priorities and identification of related science requirements and (b) better provision by scientists of ‘policy-ready’ information on existing priorities, emerging issues and scientific/technological advances relevant to environmental protection. The Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research (SCAR) has a long and successful record of summarizing policy-relevant scientific knowledge to policy makers, such as through its Group of Specialists on Environmental Affairs and Conservation (GOSEAC) up to 2002, currently the SCAR Standing Committee on the Antarctic Treaty System (SCATS) and recently through its involvement in the Antarctic Environments Portal. Improvements to science-policy communication mechanisms, combined with purposeful consideration of funding opportunities for policy-relevant science, would greatly enhance international policy development and protection of the Antarctic environment.
Centre d'Ingénierie des Protéines - CIP
Politique Scientifique Fédérale (Belgique) = Belgian Federal Science Policy ; Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique (Communauté française de Belgique) - F.R.S.-FNRS
CCAMBIO, participation as scientific expert to the Belgian delegation to the Committee on Environmental Protection of the Antarctic Treaty
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ($('prev-but').click();

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

Open access
AntarcticenvironmentalprotectionHughesESP18.pdfPublisher postprint542.96 kBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.