[en] Two dairy farms
located in Pays de Herve and in Ardennes were followed at regular intervals in order to assess levels of nitrogen rejection. In Farm 1, the cows were divided into two groups: group HP contained high production cows and group BP contained cows with a lower production yield. Each group was offered a specific basal diet. In Farm 2, only one group of cows was assessed. The feed rations
on both farms were characterized by a imbalance between the yields allowed by the energy or the nitrogen supplies and by an extremely high OEB balance of 794, 582 and 726 g, respectively, in groups HP and BP and in the Farm 2 group. Dietary changes were proposed in order to balance milk yields and to reduce the hypothesized nitrogen balance. The yield and urea content data from each milk record, along with data regarding nitrogen rejection, were statistically analyzed using a mixed model, which included an autoregressive covariance. The data from records 2, 3, 4 and 5 were then compared to the data from record 1. The advised changes implemented in the feeding management plan maintained milk yields at values similar to the yields observed in record 1 - 36.2, 24.3 and 23.0 l of 4% fat-corrected milk expressed for fixed days in milk groups HP and BP and the Farm 2 group. The changes induced a significant reduction in the milk urea content (220 vs 300 mg.l-1) and a significant reduction in nitrogen rejection, whether expressed in terms of g per day per cow, g.l-1 or kg per year per cow. The cows in the Farm 2 group rejected less nitrogen in absolute terms (217.9 vs 260.1 g per day). However, it is interesting to note that the management approach in Farm 1 was more efficient in terms of nitrogen rejection since the level was on average 9 g.l-1 in comparison with 10 g.l-1 in Farm 2. In conclusion, it appears that, for either farm, whether an intensive or extensive management regime was being employed, the provision of well balanced feed rations led to a reduction in nitrogen rejection. It should, however, be noted that management advice needs to be provided on a farm by farm basis.
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry
Author, co-author :
Knapp, Emilie ; Université de Liège > Département clinique des animaux de production (DCP) > Médecine interne des équidés, des ruminants et des porcs
Istasse, Louis ; Université de Liège > Département de productions animales > Nutrition des animaux domestiques
Hornick, Jean-Luc ; Université de Liège > Département des productions animales (DPA) > Nutrition animale en milieu tropical
Dufrasne, Isabelle ; Université de Liège > Département des productions animales (DPA) > Nutrition des animaux domestiques
Language :
English
Title :
Improvements after precision dietary management of nitrogen rejection in two commercial dairy farms in Wallonia.
Publication date :
2013
Journal title :
Biotechnologie, Agronomie, Société et Environnement
Borsting C.F. et al., 2003. Reducing nitrogen surplus from dairy farms. Effects of feeding and management. Livest. Sci., 83, 165-178.
Carlsson J. & Pehrson B., 1994. The influence of the dietary balance between energy and protein in milk concentration. Experimental trials assessed by two different protein evaluation systems. Acta Vet. Scand., 35, 193-205.
De Brabander D.L., Botterman S.M., Vanacker J.M. & Boucqué C.V., 1998. La teneur du lait en urée comme indicateur de l'alimentation énergétique et protéique de la vache laitière ainsi que de l'excrétion d'azote. In: 5e Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants, 2-3 décembre 1998, La Villette, France, INRA.
De Campeneere S., de Brabander D.L. & Vanacker J.M., 2006. Milk urea concentration as affected by theroughage type offered to dairy cattle. Livest. Sci., 103, 30-39.
De Campeneere S. et al., 2009. Feeding measures to reduce nitrogen excretion in dairy cattle. Arch. Anim. Nutr., 63(2), 87-103.
Deprez B., Parmentier R., Lambert R. & Peeters A., 2007. Rendement, qualité, économie et environnement. In: Les prairies temporaires: une culture durable pour les exploitations mixtes. Dossier de la Recherche agricole. Vol 2. Namur, Belgique: Région Wallonne, 7-38.
Dhanoa M.S. & le Du Y.L.P., 1982. A partial adjustment model to describe the lactation curve of a dairy cow. Anim. Prod., 34, 243-247.
Directive 71/250/EEC, 1971. Community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Communities, 155, 13-37.
Directive 71/393/EEC, 1971. Community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Communities, 279, 7-18.
Directive 72/199/EEC, 1972. Community methods of analysis for the official control of feedingstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Communities, 123, 6-34.
DufrasneI., IstasseI., RobayeV. & HornickJ.L., 2010. Influence du type de fertilisation, du jour de pâturage et du mois de l'année sur les rejets azotés chez des vaches laitières. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 14(S1), 45-57.
GhyselF., CurnelY., OgerR. & StilmantD., 2009. Modéliser les performances techniques, économiques et environnementales des systèmes agraires afin d'explorer les voies d'évolutions possibles: le modèle « OptiMAE ». In: 16es Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants, 2-3 décembre 2009, Paris, France, 93-96.
GroffE.B. & WuZ., 2005. Milk production and nitrogen excretion of dairy cows fed different amounts of protein and varying proportions of alfalfa and corn silage. J. Dairy Sci., 88, 3619-3632.
Hutson J. et al., 1998. Improving dairy farm sustainability. II: Environmental losses and nutrient flows. J. Prod. Agric., 11, 233-239.
Klausner S., 1993. Mass nutrient balances on dairy farms. In: Proceedings of the Cornell Nutrition Conference for feed manufacturer, 19-21 Octobre, 1993, Department of Animal Science and Division of Nutrition, Cornell University Agricultural Experiment Station, Ithaca, NY, USA, 126-129.
KohnR.A., KalscheurK.F. & Russek-CohenE., 2002. Evaluation of models to estimate urinary nitrogen and expected milk urea nitrogen. J. Dairy Sci., 85, 227-233.
Lambert R. et al., 2010. Vers une révision de la norme de production d'azote de la vache laitière: justification et conséquences sur le taux de liaison au sol des exploitations laitières. Biotechnol. Agron. Soc. Environ., 14(S1), 67-71.
Leonardi C., Stevenson M. & Armentano L.E., 2003. Effect of two levels of crude protein and methionine supplementation on performance of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 4033-4042.
Ministère de l'Agriculture, 1983. Het nieuw energiesysteem (VEM) voor de melkveehouderij in Belgie. 2e ed. Brussel: Ministerie van Landbouw.
Ministère de l'Agriculture, 1992. DVE: le nouveau système d'évaluation des protéines pour le bétail bovin en Belgique. Bruxelles: Service Information du Ministère de l'Agriculture.
NousiainenJ., ShingfieldK.J. & HuhtanenP., 2004. Evaluation of milk urea nitrogen as a diagnostic of protein feeding. J. Dairy Sci., 87, 386-398.
Pfimlin A., 2009. De l'autonomie alimentaire à la ferme à la souveraineté alimentaire des peuples. Alter Agri, 98, 3.
SPF Économie, 2011. Résultats définitifs de l'enquête agricole de mai 2010, http://statbel.fgov.be/fr/modules/pressrelease/statistiques/economie/recensement_agricole_de_mai_2010.jsp, (15/12/2012).
Stilmant D., Lecomte Ph. & Fabry L., 1999. Un cheptel performant valorisant les fourrages de l'exploitation: le meilleur gage de rentabilité pour des exploitations laitières respectueuses de leur environnement. In: 6e Rencontres autour des Recherches sur les Ruminants, 1-2 décembre 1999, Paris, France, 51.
StilmantD., DecruyenaereV. & WinanceE., 2006. Comment prendre en compte le long terme dans l'orientation donnée à nos systèmes d'élevage herbagers? Fourrages, 185, 123-128.
Tamminga S. et al., 1994. The Dutch protein evaluation system: the DVE/OEB-system. Livest. Prod. Sci., 40, 139-155.
WattiauxM.A. & KargK.L., 2004. Protein level for alfalfa and corn silage based diets. I. Lactational response and milk urea nitrogen. J. Dairy Sci., 87, 3480-3491.