Sediment connectivity; agricultural watershed; pixel size; index; DEM
Abstract :
[en] Connectivity has become an increasingly used concept in hydrological and sediment research. In order to quantify it, various indices have been proposed since the start of the 21st century including the index of connectivity developed by Borselli et al. (2008). This index is based on a limited number of factors, the most important one being topography. Sediment connectivity indices values are likely to depend on the digital elevation model (DEM) resolution. The aim of this study was, first, to compare the effect of DEM pixel size (between 0.25 and 10 m, using an UAV) in the Belgian loess belt, a lowland area. We show that the index values were lower when the pixel size decreased (a difference of about 20 % in value between 0.25 and 10 m). In addition, the impact of linear features in the watershed (e.g., grass strip, bank and road) was lower with the largest pixel sizes, and the connectivity pattern was affected with a pixel size of 5 m or more. At lower pixel sizes (1 m or below), some more disconnected regions appeared. These corresponded to zones where there had been water stagnation during and after rainfalls, and was corroborated by field observations. This confirmed the need for a proper resolution according to the objectives of the study. The second aim of this study was to deduce a minimum pixel size for connectivity study, helping local erosion or sedimentation location and consequent land management decisions. In our context, 1 m stands as the optimum DEM resolution. This pixel size permitted to locate all “key areas” in terms of erosion. Very high resolutions (<0.5 m) did not generate much more information, and their calculation time was far greater.
Disciplines :
Earth sciences & physical geography
Author, co-author :
Cantreul, Vincent ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Echanges Eau-Sol-Plantes
Bielders, Charles; Université catholique de Louvain (UCL) > Faculty of Bioscience Engineering & Earth and Life Institute
Calsamiglia, Aleix; University of the Balearic Islands > MEDhyCON Research Group
Degré, Aurore ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Echanges Eau-Sol-Plantes
Language :
English
Title :
How pixel size affects a sediment connectivity index in central Belgium
Publication date :
2018
Journal title :
Earth Surface Processes and Landforms
ISSN :
0197-9337
eISSN :
1096-9837
Publisher :
John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Chichester, United Kingdom
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Agisoft. 2014. Agisoft PhotoScan User Manual: Professional Edition. Version 1.0.0 (version 1.0.0). Repéré à http://www.agisoft.ru/products/photoscan/professional/
Akbari A, Samah A, Othman F. 2009. Effect of pixel size on the areal storm pattern analysis using kriging. Journal of Applied Sciences (Faisalabad) 9(20): 3707–3714.
Arana M, Martín RS, Nagore I, Pérez D. 2011. What precision in the Digital Terrain Model is required for noise mapping? Noise Mapping 72(8): 522–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.06.010.
Arun PV. 2013. A comparative analysis of different DEM interpolation methods. Geodesy and Cartography 39(4): 171–177. https://doi.org/10.3846/20296991.2013.859821.
Bhattacharya A, Arora MK, Sharma ML. 2013. Usefulness of adaptive filtering for improved digital elevation model generation. Journal of the Geological Society of India 82(2): 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12594-013-0133-4.
Bielders CL, Ramelot C, Persoons E. 2003. Farmer perception of runoff and erosion and extent of flooding in the silt-loam belt of the Belgian Walloon Region. Socio-Economic Factors in Soil Erosion and Conservation 6(1): 85–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00117-X.
Boardman J. 2010. A short history of muddy floods. Land Degradation and Development 21(4): 303–309. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.1007.
Boardman J, Evans R, Ford J. 2003. Muddy floods on the South Downs, southern England: problem and responses. Socio-Economic Factors in Soil Erosion and Conservation 6(1): 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1462-9011(02)00125-9.
Boardman J, Vandaele K. 2010. Soil erosion, muddy floods and the need for institutional memory. Area 42(4): 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00948.x.
Boll J, Brooks ES, Crabtree B, Dun S, Steenhuis TS. 2015. Variable source area hydrology modeling with the water erosion prediction project model. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 51(2): 330–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12294.
Borselli L, Cassi P, Torri D. 2008. Prolegomena to sediment and flow connectivity in the landscape: a GIS and field numerical assessment. CATENA 75(3): 268–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2008.07.006.
Bothale RV, Pandey B. 2013. Evaluation and comparison of multi resolution DEM derived through Cartosat-1 Stereo Pair – a case study of Damanganga basin. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing 41(3): 497–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-012-0243-2.
Bracken LJ, Croke J. 2007. The concept of hydrological connectivity and its contribution to understanding runoff-dominated geomorphic systems. Hydrological Processes 21(13): 1749–1763. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6313.
Bracken LJ, Turnbull L, Wainwright J, Bogaart P. 2015. Sediment connectivity: a framework for understanding sediment transfer at multiple scales. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 40(2): 177–188.
Bracken LJ, Wainwright J, Ali GA, Tetzlaff D, Smith MW, Reaney SM, Roy AG. 2013. Concepts of hydrological connectivity: research approaches, pathways and future agendas. Earth-Science Reviews 119: 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2013.02.001.
Brandt A. 2016. Modeling and visualizing uncertainties of flood boundary delineation : algorithm for slope and DEM resolution dependencies of 1D hydraulic models. Stoch Environment Research Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-016-1212-z.
Brardinoni F, Cavalli M, Heckmann T, Liébault F, Rimböck A. 2015. Guidelines for Assessing Sediment Dynamics in Alpine Basins and Channel Reaches (no WP4) (1-70). Sediment Management in Alpine basins.
Brasington J, Vericat D, Rychkov I. 2012. Modeling river bed morphology, roughness, and surface sedimentology using high resolution terrestrial laser scanning. Water Resources Research 48(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012223.
Castillo V, Gómez-Plaza A, Martı́nez-Mena M. 2003. The role of antecedent soil water content in the runoff response of semiarid catchments: a simulation approach. Journal of Hydrology 284(1–4): 114–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00264-6.
Cavalli M, Crema S, Marchi L. 2014. Guidelines on the Sediment Connectivity ArcGis Toolbox and Stand-alone Application (no Release 1.0) (1–33).
Cavalli M, Trevisani S, Comiti F, Marchi L. 2013. Geomorphometric assessment of spatial sediment connectivity in small Alpine catchments. Sediment Sources, Source-to-Sink Fluxes and Sedimentary Budgets 188: 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.05.007.
Cavazzi S, Corstanje R, Mayr T, Hannam J, Fealy R. 2013. Are fine resolution digital elevation models always the best choice in digital soil mapping? Geoderma 195–196: 111–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2012.11.020.
Cerdan O, Le Bissonnais Y, Couturier A, Saby N. 2002. Modelling interrill erosion in small cultivated catchments. Hydrological Processes 16(16): 3215–3226. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1098.
Claessens L, Heuvelink GBM, Schoorl JM, Veldkamp A. 2005. DEM resolution effects on shallow landslide hazard and soil redistribution modelling. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 30(4): 461–477. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1155.
Croke J, Mockler S, Fogarty P, Takken I. 2005. Sediment concentration changes in runoff pathways from a forest road network and the resultant spatial pattern of catchment connectivity. Geomorphology 68(3–4): 257–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2004.11.020.
D’ Ozouville N, Deffontaines B, Benveniste J, Wegmüller U, Violette S, de Marsily G. 2008. DEM generation using ASAR (ENVISAT) for addressing the lack of freshwater ecosystems management, Santa Cruz Island, Galapagos. Applications of Remote Sensing to Monitoring Freshwater and Estuarine Systems 112(11): 4131–4147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2008.02.017.
de Mello CR, Norton LD, Pinto LC, Beskow S, Curi N. 2016. Agricultural watershed modeling: a review for hydrology and soil erosion processes. Ciência e Agrotecnologia 40: 7–25.
Dunjó G, Pardini G, Gispert M. 2004. The role of land use – land cover on runoff generation and sediment yield at a microplot scale, in a small Mediterranean catchment. Journal of Arid Environments 57(2): 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-1963(03)00097-1.
Dunne T, Zhang W, Aubry BF. 1991. Effects of rainfall, vegetation, and microtopography on infiltration and runoff. Water Resources Research 27(9): 2271–2285. https://doi.org/10.1029/91WR01585.
Evrard O, Bielders CL, Vandaele K, van Wesemael B. 2007. Spatial and temporal variation of muddy floods in central Belgium, off-site impacts and potential control measures. CATENA 70(3): 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.11.011.
Evrard O, Nord G, Cerdan O, Souchère V, Le Bissonnais Y, Bonté P. 2010. Modelling the impact of land use change and rainfall seasonality on sediment export from an agricultural catchment of the northwestern European loess belt. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 138(1–2): 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2010.04.003.
Evrard O, Vandaele K, van Wesemael B, Bielders CL. 2008. A grassed waterway and earthen dams to control muddy floods from a cultivated catchment of the Belgian loess belt. Geomorphology 100(3–4): 419–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.01.010.
Fenicia F, Savenije HHG, Matgen P, Pfister L. 2008. Understanding catchment behavior through stepwise model concept improvement. Water Resources Research 44(1) n/a-n/a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005563.
Foerster S, Wilczok C, Brosinsky A, Segl K. 2014. Assessment of sediment connectivity from vegetation cover and topography using remotely sensed data in a dryland catchment in the Spanish Pyrenees. Journal of Soils and Sediments 14(12): 1982–2000. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-014-0992-3.
Fonstad MA, Dietrich JT, Courville BC, Jensen JL, Carbonneau PE. 2013. Topographic structure from motion: a new development in photogrammetric measurement. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 38(4): 421–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3366.
Gabriels D, Ghekiere G, Schiettecatte W, Rottiers I. 2003. Assessment of USLE cover-management C-factors for 40 crop rotation systems on arable farms in the Kemmelbeek watershed, Belgium. Soil and Tillage Research 74(1): 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00092-8.
Gay A, Cerdan O, Mardhel V, Desmet M. 2016. Application of an index of sediment connectivity in a lowland area. Journal of Soils and Sediments 16(1): 280–293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11368-015-1235-y.
Hanssen RF. 2001. Radar Interferometry: Data Interpretation and Error Analysis. Technische Universiteit Delft: Delft.
Hurst MD, Mudd SM, Walcott R, Attal M, Yoo K. 2012. Using hilltop curvature to derive the spatial distribution of erosion rates. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface 117(F2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2011JF002057.
Kalantari Z, Cavalli M, Cantone C, Crema S, Destouni G. 2017. Flood probability quantification for road infrastructure: data-driven spatial-statistical approach and case study applications. Science of the Total Environment 581–582: 386–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.12.147.
Keesstra SD, Temme AJAM, Schoorl JM, Visser SM. 2014. Evaluating the hydrological component of the new catchment-scale sediment delivery model LAPSUS-D. Special Issue: Stream Catchment Dynamics 212: 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.04.021.
Legorreta Paulin G, Bursik M, Lugo-Hubp J, Zamorano Orozco JJ. 2010. Effect of pixel size on cartographic representation of shallow and deep-seated landslide, and its collateral effects on the forecasting of landslides by SINMAP and Multiple Logistic Regression landslide models. Modelling and Simulation of Dangerous Phenomena, and Innovative Techniques for Hazard Mapping and Mitigation 35(3–5): 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2010.04.008.
López-Vicente M, Poesen J, Navas A, Gaspar L. 2013. Predicting runoff and sediment connectivity and soil erosion by water for different land use scenarios in the Spanish Pre-Pyrenees. Scales in Soil Erosion 102: 62–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2011.01.001.
López-Vicente M, Quijano L, Palazón L, Gaspar L, Navas A. 2015. Assessment of soil redistribution at catchment scale by coupling a soil erosion model and a sediment connectivity index (central Spanish Pre-Pyrenees). Cuadernos de Investigación Geográfica 41(1): 21.
Maugnard A, Bielders C, Bock L, Colinet G, Cordonnier H, Degré A, Mokadem AI. 2013. Cartographie du risque d’érosion hydrique à l’échelle parcellaire en soutien à la politique agricole wallonne (Belgique) et identification des parcelles à risque d’érosion en soutien à la politique régionale. Etude et Gestion des Sols 20: 127–141.
Muhammad AS, Rutzinger M, Wichmann V, Stoetter J, Sartohadi J. 2013. Evaluation of methods for digital elevation model interpolation of tillage systems. Journal of Natural Resources and Development 03: 128–139. https://doi.org/10.5027/jnrd.v3i0.13.
Pechlivanidis IG, McIntyre NR, Wheater HS. 2010. Calibration of the semi-distributed PDM rainfall–runoff model in the Upper Lee catchment, UK. Journal of Hydrology 386(1–4): 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.03.022.
Peñuela A, Darboux F, Javaux M, Bielders CL. 2016. Evolution of overland flow connectivity in bare agricultural plots. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3938.
Pineux N, Lisein J, Swerts G, Bielders C, Lejeune P, Colinet G, Degré A. 2017. Can DEM time series produced by UAV be used to quantify diffuse erosion in an agricultural watershed? Geomorphology 280: 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2016.12.003.
Polat N, Uysal M, Toprak AS. 2015. An investigation of DEM generation process based on LiDAR data filtering, decimation, and interpolation methods for an urban area. Measurement 75: 50–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2015.08.008.
Reid SC, Lane SN, Montgomery DR, Brookes CJ. 2007. Does hydrological connectivity improve modelling of coarse sediment delivery in upland environments? Reduced-Complexity Geomorphological Modelling for River and Catchment Management 90(3–4): 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.10.023.
Rust W, Corstanje R, Holman IP, Milne AE. 2014. Detecting land use and land management influences on catchment hydrology by modelling and wavelets. Journal of Hydrology 517: 378–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.05.052.
Singh R, Wagener T, van Werkhoven K, Mann ME, Crane R. 2011. A trading-space-for-time approach to probabilistic continuous streamflow predictions in a changing climate – accounting for changing watershed behavior. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 15(11): 3591–3603.
Sogbedji JM, Mclsaac GF. 2002. Modeling streamflow from artificially drained agricultural watersheds in Illinois. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(6): 1753–1765. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb04379.x.
Sona G, Pinto L, Pagliari D, Passoni D, Gini R. 2014. Experimental analysis of different software packages for orientation and digital surface modelling from UAV images. Earth Science Informatics 7(2): 97–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-013-0142-2.
Sørensen R, Seibert J. 2007. Effects of DEM resolution on the calculation of topographical indices: TWI and its components. Journal of Hydrology 347(1–2): 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.001.
Souchere V, King D, Daroussin J, Papy F, Capillon A. 1998. Effects of tillage on runoff directions: consequences on runoff contributing area within agricultural catchments. Journal of Hydrology 206(3–4): 256–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(98)00103-6.
Sougnez N, van Wesemael B, Vanacker V. 2011. Low erosion rates measured for steep, sparsely vegetated catchments in southeast Spain. CATENA 84(1–2): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2010.08.010.
Tarboton DG. 1997. A new method for the determination of flow directions and upslope areas in grid digital elevation models. Water Resources Research 33(2): 309–319. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR03137.
Van Nieuwenhuyse B, Wyseure G, Govers G. 2012. Measuring and Modelling Hydrological Surface Connectivity (Bio-ingenieurswetenschappen). KU Leuven: Leuven.
Van Rompaey AJJ, Govers G, Puttemans C. 2002. Modelling land use changes and their impact on soil erosion and sediment supply to rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 27(5): 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.335.
Verhoeven G. 2011. Taking computer vision aloft – archaeological three-dimensional reconstructions from aerial photographs with photoscan. Archaeological Prospection 18(1): 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.399.
Verspecht A, Vandermeulen V, De Bolle S, Moeskops B, Vermang J, Van den Bossche A, De Neve S. 2011. Integrated policy approach to mitigate soil erosion in West Flanders. Land Degradation and Development 22(1): 84–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.991.
Verstraeten G, Poesen J. 1999. The nature of small-scale flooding, muddy floods and retention pond sedimentation in central Belgium. Geomorphology 29(3–4): 275–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(99)00020-3.
Verstraeten G, Poesen J, Govers G, Gillijns K, Bielders C, Goossens D, Vanwalleghem T. 2006. Soil erosion in Belgium. Chapter 1.30. In Soil Erosion in Europe, Dans JB, Poesen J (eds). Wiley Repéré à Handle: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/72870.
Von Gunten D, Wöhling T, Haslauer C, Merchán D, Causapé J, Cirpka OA. 2014. Efficient calibration of a distributed pde-based hydrological model using grid coarsening. Journal of Hydrology 519(Part D): 3290–3304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.10.025.
Wainwright J, Turnbull L, Ibrahim TG, Lexartza-Artza I, Thornton SF, Brazier RE. 2011. Linking environmental régimes, space and time: Interpretations of structural and functional connectivity. Geomorphology on Multiscale Feedbacks in Ecogeomorphology 126(3–4): 387–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.07.027.
Western AW, Blöschl G, Grayson RB. 2001. Toward capturing hydrologically significant connectivity in spatial patterns. Water Resources Research 37(1): 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900241.
Westoby MJ, Brasington J, Glasser NF, Hambrey MJ, Reynolds JM. 2012. « Structure-from-Motion » photogrammetry: a low-cost, effective tool for geoscience applications. Geomorphology 179: 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.08.021.
Willgoose G. 2004. Mathematical modeling of whole landscape evolution. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 33(1): 443–459. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.earth.33.092203.122610.
Wischmeier WH, Smith DD. 1978. Predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses : A Guide to Conservation Planning. Science and Education Administration, US Department of Agriculture: USA.
Zebker HA, Werner CL, Rosen PA, Hensley S. 1994. Accuracy of topographic maps derived from ERS-1 interferometric radar. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 32(4): 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1109/36.298010.
Zhang Y, Vaze J, Chiew FHS, Teng J, Li M. 2014. Predicting hydrological signatures in ungauged catchments using spatial interpolation, index model, and rainfall–runoff modelling. Journal of Hydrology 517: 936–948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.06.032.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
