Lim SS, Vos T, Flaxman AD, Danaei G, Shibuya K, Adair-Rohani H, Amann M, Anderson HR, Andrews KG, Aryee M, et al. A comparative risk assessment of burden of disease and injury attributable to 67 risk factors and risk factor clusters in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012;380:2224-60
Ligthelm RJ, Borzì V, Gumprecht J, Kawamori R, Yang WY, Valensi P. Importance of observational studies in clinical practice. Clin Ther 2007;29:1284-92
Carlson MD, Morrison RS. Study design, precision, and validity in observational studies. J Palliat Med 2009;12:77-82
Byers T. The role of epidemiology in developing nutritional recommendations: past, present, and future. Am J Clin Nutr 1999;69:1304S-8S
van Ommen B, Bouwman J, Dragsted LO, Drevon CA, Elliott R, de Groot P, Kaput J, Mathers JC, Muller M, Pepping F, et al. Challenges of molecular nutrition research 6: the nutritional phenotype database to store, share and evaluate nutritional systems biology studies. Genes Nutr 2010;5:189-203
NCD Risk Factor Collaboration (NCD-RisC). Trends in adult bodymass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet 2016;387:1377-96
Del Gobbo LC, Khatibzadeh S, Imamura F, Micha R, Shi P, Smith M, Myers SS, Mozaffarian D. Assessing global dietary habits: a comparison of national estimates from the FAO and the Global Dietary Database. Am J Clin Nutr 2015;101:1038-46
Sorensen HT, Sabroe S, Olsen J. A framework for evaluation of secondary data sources for epidemiological research. Int J Epidemiol 1996; 25:435-42
Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M, Baak A, Blomberg N, Boiten JW, da Silva Santos LB, Bourne PE, et al. The FAIR guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 2016;3:160018
Mathers CD. Uncertainty and data availability for the global burden of disease estimates 2000-2002. Geneva (Switzerland): WHO; 2005
Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, Moher D, Becker BJ, Sipe TA, Thacker SB. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. Metaanalysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) group. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12
Colditz GA, Burdick E, Mosteller F. Heterogeneity in meta-analysis of data from epidemiologic studies: a commentary. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:371-82
Sanderson S, Tatt ID, Higgins JP. Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology: a systematic review and annotated bibliography. Int J Epidemiol 2007;36:666-76
ENPADASI. Phenotype database (DASH-IN) [Internet]. [cited 2017 May 17]. Available from: https://dashin.eu/interventionstudies/
Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Methodology checklist 3 & 4 for cohort and case-control studies. 7th September [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/checklists-and-notes.html
Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0. Oxford (United Kingdom): The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011
Katrak P, Bialocerkowski AE, Massy-Westropp N, Kumar S, Grimmer KA. A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools. BMC Med Res Methodol 2004;4:22
Deeks JJ, Dinnes J, D'Amico R, Sowden AJ, Sakarovitch C, Song F, Petticrew M, Altman DG; International Stroke Trial Collaborative Group, European Carotid Surgery Trial Collaborative Group. Evaluating nonrandomised intervention studies. Health Technol Assess 2003;7:iii-x, 1-173
Crowe M, Sheppard L. A general critical appraisal tool: an evaluation of construct validity. Int J Nurs Stud 2011;48:1505-16
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE-Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med 2007;4:e296
Sansone SA, Rocca-Serra P, Field D, Maguire E, Taylor C, Hofmann O, Fang H, Neumann S, Tong W, Amaral-Zettler L, et al. Toward interoperable bioscience data. Nat Genet 2012;44:121-6
Lachat C, Hawwash D, Ocke MC, Berg C, Forsum E, Hornell A, Larsson C, Sonestedt E, Wirfalt E, Akesson A, et al. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Nutritional Epidemiology (STROBE-nut): an extension of the STROBE Statement. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002036
Willett W. Nutritional epidemiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998
National Library of Medicine. Medical subject headings [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2016 Nov 25]. Available from: https://www.nlm.nih.gov/mesh/meshhome.html
Porta M. A dictionary of epidemiology. 6th ed. [Internet]. [cited 2017 Apr 26]. Available from: http://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/acref/9780199976720.001.0001/acref-9780199976720
Raper N, Perloff B, Ingwersen L, Steinfeldt L, Anand J. An overview of USDA's dietary intake data system. J Food Compos Anal 2004;17:545-55
The American Association for Public Opinion Research. Standard definitions: final dispositions of case codes and outcome rates for surveys. 9th ed. Oakbrook Terrace (IL): AAPOR; 2016
Greenfield H, Southgate DA. Food composition data: production, management and use. 2nd ed. Rome (Italy): FAO UN; 2003
FAO/INFOODS. FAO/INFOODS Guidelines for food matching. Version 1.2. Rome (Italy): FAO; 2012
Bergdahl M, Ehling M, Elvers E, Földesi E, Körner T, Kron A, Lohauβ P, Mag K, Morais V, Nimmergut A, et al. Handbook on data quality assessment methods and tools. Wiesbaden (Germany): European Commission Eurostat; 2007
Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. [Internet]. [cited 2015 Mar 17]. Available from: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.htm
Friedenreich CM, Brant RF, Riboli E. Influence of methodologic factors in a pooled analysis of 13 case-control studies of colorectal cancer and dietary fiber. Epidemiology 1994;5:66-79
Margetts BM, Thompson RL, Key T, Duffy S, Nelson M, Bingham S, Wiseman M. Development of a scoring system to judge the scientific quality of information from case-control and cohort studies of nutrition and disease. Nutr Cancer 1995;24:231-9
Yang WY, Burrows T, MacDonald-Wicks L, Williams LT, Collins C, Chee WS. Quality of dietary assessment methodology and reporting in epidemiology studies examining relationship between dietary outcome and childhood obesity in developing Asian countries: a systematic review. Nutr Diet 2014;71:201-9
NNR5 Working Group. A guide for conducting systematic literature reviews for the 5th edition of the Nordic Nutrition Recommendations. Revised ed. Copenhagen (Denmark): Nordic Council of Ministers; 2011
Hoy D, Brooks P, Woolf A, Blyth F, March L, Bain C, Baker P, Smith E, Buchbinder R. Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:934-9
Al-Jader LN, Newcombe RG, Hayes S, Murray A, Layzell J, Harper PS. Developing a quality scoring system for epidemiological surveys of genetic disorders. Clin Genet 2002;62:230-4
Jackson N, Waters E. Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in Health Promotion and Public Health Taskforce. Criteria for the systematic review of health promotion and public health interventions. Health Promot Int 2005;20:367-74
Ross LE, Grigoriadis S, Mamisashvili L, Koren G, Steiner M, Dennis CL, Cheung A, Mousmanis P. Quality assessment of observational studies in psychiatry: an example from perinatal psychiatric research. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res 2011;20:224-34
Giannakopoulos NN, Rammelsberg P, Eberhard L, Schmitter M. A new instrument for assessing the quality of studies on prevalence. Clin Oral Investig 2012;16:781-8
Thompson S, Ekelund U, Jebb S, Lindroos AK, Mander A, Sharp S, Turner R, Wilks D. A proposed method of bias adjustment for metaanalyses of published observational studies. Int J Epidemiol 2011;40: 765-77
Cho MK, Bero LA. Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature. JAMA 1994;272:101-4
Carneiro AV. Critical appraisal of prognostic evidence: practical rules. Rev Port Cardiol 2002;21:891-900
Singh J. Critical appraisal skills programme. J Pharmacol Pharmacother 2013;4:76
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). [Internet]. [cited 2016 Jan 20]. Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/process/pmg10/chapter/appendix-e-methodology-checklist-casecontrol-studies
Rostom A, Dubé C, Cranney A, Saloojee N, Sy R, Garritty C, Sampson M, Zhang L, Yazdi F, Mamaladze V, et al. Celiac disease. Evidence report/technology assessment no. 104. (Prepared by the University of Ottawa evidence-based practice center, under contract No. 290-02-0021). Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2004
Zeng X, Zhang Y, Kwong JS, Zhang C, Li S, Sun F, Niu Y, Du L. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review. J Evid Based Med 2015;8:2-10
National Collaborating Centre for Environmental Health (NCCEH). A primer for evaluating the quality of studies on environmental health. Critical appraisal of cross-sectional studies [Internet]. [updated 2014 Jun 5; cited 2015 Dec 20]. Available from: http://www.ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/Critical_Appraisal_Cross-Sectional_Studies_Aug_2011.pdf
Center for Evidence-Based Management (CEBMa). Critical appraisal of casecontrol study, cohort/panel study and survey [Internet]. [updated 2014 Jun 5; cited 2016 Jan 20]. Available from: http://www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Critical-Appraisal-Questions-for-a-Case-Control-Study.pdf
Genaidy AM, Lemasters GK, Lockey J, Succop P, Deddens J, Sobeih T, Dunning K. An epidemiological appraisal instrument-a tool for evaluation of epidemiological studies. Ergonomics 2007;50:920-60
National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC). How to use the evidence: assessment and application of scientific evidence. Canberra (Australia): National Health and Medical Research Council; 2000
Greenhalgh T. How to read a paper: assessing the methodological quality of published papers. BMJ 1997;315:305-8
Greenhalgh T, Taylor R. How to read a paper: papers that go beyond numbers (qualitative research). BMJ 1997;315:740-3
Heller RF, Verma A, Gemmell I, Harrison R, Hart J, Edwards R. Critical appraisal for public health: a new checklist. Public Health 2008;122:92-8
Sirriyeh R, Lawton R, Gardner P, Armitage G. Reviewing studies with diverse designs: the development and evaluation of a new tool. J Eval Clin Pract 2012;18:746-52
Illner AK, Freisling H, Boeing H, Huybrechts I, Crispim SP, Slimani N. Review and evaluation of innovative technologies for measuring diet in nutritional epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 2012;41:1187-203
Bes-Rastrollo M, Schulze MB, Ruiz-Canela M, Martinez-Gonzalez MA. Financial conflicts of interest and reporting bias regarding the association between sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review of systematic reviews. PLOS Med 2013;10:e1001578
Even A, Shankaranarayan G. Understanding impartial versus utilitydriven quality assessment in large datasets. Presented at 12th International Conference on Information Quality; 2007 Nov 9-11, MIT, Cambridge, MA
Maelstrom Research program. Publish with Mica: what is Mica? [Internet]. [cited 2017 June 22]. Available from: http://www.obiba.org/pages/products/mica/
Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Nutrition. FAO/WHO Global Individual Food consumption data Tool (FAO/WHO GIFT) [Internet]. [updated 2016Mar 22; cited 2016 Aug 19]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/nutrition/assessment/food-consumption-database/en/
Preece A, Missier P, Ernbury S, Jin B, Greenwood M. An ontologybased approach to handling information quality in e-science. Concurr Comp-Pract E 2008;20:253-64
Min H, Manion FJ, Goralczyk E, Wong YN, Ross E, Beck JR. Integration of prostate cancer clinical data using an ontology. J Biomed Inform 2009;42:1035-45
ENPADASI. Ontology-for-nutritional-studies [Internet]. 2016. [cited 2017 Jun 24]. Available from: https://github.com/enpadasi/Ontologyfor-Nutritional-Studies
Hootman JM, Driban JB, Sitler MR, Harris KP, Cattano NM. Reliability and validity of three quality rating instruments for systematic reviews of observational studies. Res Synth Methods 2011;2:110-8