Reference : How can seed removal rates of zoochoric tree species be assessed quickly and accurately?
Scientific journals : Article
Life sciences : Environmental sciences & ecology
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/214427
How can seed removal rates of zoochoric tree species be assessed quickly and accurately?
English
Hambuckers, julien mailto [Université de Liège > HEC Liège : UER > Statistique appliquée à la gestion et à l'économie >]
Dauvrin, Alice mailto []
Trolliet, Franck mailto [Université de Liège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Modélisation du climat et des cycles biogéochimiques >]
Evrard, Quentin mailto [Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Laboratoire de Foresterie des régions trop. et subtropicales >]
Forget, Pierre-Michel mailto []
Hambuckers, Alain mailto [Université de Liège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Biologie du comportement - Ethologie et psychologie animale >]
2017
Forest Ecology and Management
Elsevier
403
152-160
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
0378-1127
[en] Afzelia bipindensis ; Dialium pachyphyllum/Dialium zenkeri ; Xylopia staudtii ; boostrap ; Mean squared error(MSE)
[en] The quantification of seed dispersal and predation processes has been gaining increased importance in the assessment of forest responses to anthropogenic disturbance, but also in developing an understanding of forest dynamics facing particular reproductive strategies. Seed removal rate is a reliable estimator of animal activities relating to these processes and can be quickly and easily estimated using a rapid assessment method (RAM) described by Lermyte & Forget (2009) and Boissier et al. (2014). This method consists in selecting trees reaching a given fruit crop in plots of interest and estimating, under each tree, the proportion of removed seeds in a single quadrat among the places having the highest crops; the proportion of removed seeds is obtained by enumeration of fruit scraps and intact fruits and estimation of their seed contents. The objective of this work is to evaluate the reliability of this method and to propose alternative estimation protocols (APs) in order to obtain an index of animal interaction with seeds.
To do so, we estimated produced and removed seed numbers in up to 30 random 1 sq.m. quadrats under a total of 19 trees of Afzelia bipindensis, Dialium pachyphyllum/zenkeri and Xylopia staudtii. Secondly, we investigated the influence of tree size and fruit production on seed removal rate using a generalized linear mixed model. Thirdly, we used a generalized linear mixed model and a bootstrap procedure to test if RAM and APs are biased. Then, we compared their accuracy throughout their mean squared error, also obtained with a bootstrap approach.
Despite its interesting accuracy, we showed that the RAM is positively biased. Removal rate was obviously influenced by canopy size and fruit production whereas the quadrats with higher fruit production have higher seed removal rates. Thus, trees with representative sizes and crops of the studied plots have to be sampled. Secondly, as an AP, random selection of several quadrats was found to be the best method. Based on these results, we recommend using the mean of three random quadrats per tree to estimate seed removal rate. It is an unbiased estimator, more accurate and more time efficient than the RAM. However, attention should be paid to select a proper quadrat size, in line with seed and fruit numbers, since the accuracy of the methods depends on these quantities. Such a choice could be made using a mean squared error criterion obtained from a preliminary intensive sampling of some specimens of the focal species.
FNRS (FRIA), ARES, German Fund for Scientific Research
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/214427
10.1016/j.foreco.2017.07.042

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Restricted access
Hambuckers et al 2017 - How can seed removal rates of zoochoric tree species be assessed quickly and accurately.pdfPublisher postprint1.29 MBRequest copy

Additional material(s):

File Commentary Size Access
Open access
R_code _SuppInfo.R816 BView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.