Article (Scientific journals)
How can seed removal rates of zoochoric tree species be assessed quickly and accurately?
Hambuckers, julien; Dauvrin, Alice; Trolliet, Franck et al.
2017In Forest Ecology and Management, 403, p. 152-160
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Hambuckers et al 2017 - How can seed removal rates of zoochoric tree species be assessed quickly and accurately.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.32 MB)
Request a copy
Annexes
R_code _SuppInfo.R
Publisher postprint (816 B)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Afzelia bipindensis; Dialium pachyphyllum/Dialium zenkeri; Xylopia staudtii; boostrap; Mean squared error(MSE)
Abstract :
[en] The quantification of seed dispersal and predation processes has been gaining increased importance in the assessment of forest responses to anthropogenic disturbance, but also in developing an understanding of forest dynamics facing particular reproductive strategies. Seed removal rate is a reliable estimator of animal activities relating to these processes and can be quickly and easily estimated using a rapid assessment method (RAM) described by Lermyte & Forget (2009) and Boissier et al. (2014). This method consists in selecting trees reaching a given fruit crop in plots of interest and estimating, under each tree, the proportion of removed seeds in a single quadrat among the places having the highest crops; the proportion of removed seeds is obtained by enumeration of fruit scraps and intact fruits and estimation of their seed contents. The objective of this work is to evaluate the reliability of this method and to propose alternative estimation protocols (APs) in order to obtain an index of animal interaction with seeds. To do so, we estimated produced and removed seed numbers in up to 30 random 1 sq.m. quadrats under a total of 19 trees of Afzelia bipindensis, Dialium pachyphyllum/zenkeri and Xylopia staudtii. Secondly, we investigated the influence of tree size and fruit production on seed removal rate using a generalized linear mixed model. Thirdly, we used a generalized linear mixed model and a bootstrap procedure to test if RAM and APs are biased. Then, we compared their accuracy throughout their mean squared error, also obtained with a bootstrap approach. Despite its interesting accuracy, we showed that the RAM is positively biased. Removal rate was obviously influenced by canopy size and fruit production whereas the quadrats with higher fruit production have higher seed removal rates. Thus, trees with representative sizes and crops of the studied plots have to be sampled. Secondly, as an AP, random selection of several quadrats was found to be the best method. Based on these results, we recommend using the mean of three random quadrats per tree to estimate seed removal rate. It is an unbiased estimator, more accurate and more time efficient than the RAM. However, attention should be paid to select a proper quadrat size, in line with seed and fruit numbers, since the accuracy of the methods depends on these quantities. Such a choice could be made using a mean squared error criterion obtained from a preliminary intensive sampling of some specimens of the focal species.
Disciplines :
Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Hambuckers, julien ;  Université de Liège > HEC Liège : UER > Statistique appliquée à la gestion et à l'économie
Dauvrin, Alice
Trolliet, Franck ;  Université de Liège > Département d'astrophys., géophysique et océanographie (AGO) > Modélisation du climat et des cycles biogéochimiques
Evrard, Quentin ;  Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Laboratoire de Foresterie des régions trop. et subtropicales
Forget, Pierre-Michel
Hambuckers, Alain  ;  Université de Liège > Département de Biologie, Ecologie et Evolution > Biologie du comportement - Ethologie et psychologie animale
Language :
English
Title :
How can seed removal rates of zoochoric tree species be assessed quickly and accurately?
Publication date :
2017
Journal title :
Forest Ecology and Management
ISSN :
0378-1127
eISSN :
1872-7042
Publisher :
Elsevier
Volume :
403
Pages :
152-160
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
FNRS (FRIA), ARES, German Fund for Scientific Research
Available on ORBi :
since 21 September 2017

Statistics


Number of views
129 (19 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
10 (5 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
3
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
0
OpenCitations
 
2

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi