Reference : Application of a two-step approach for mapping ice thickness to various glacier types...
Scientific journals : Article
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences : Earth sciences & physical geography
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/213940
Application of a two-step approach for mapping ice thickness to various glacier types on Svalbard
English
Fürst, Johannes Jakob [> >]
Gillet-Chaulet, Fabien [> >]
Benham, Toby J. [> >]
Dowdeswell, Julian A. [> >]
Grabiec, Mariusz [> >]
Navarro, Francisco [> >]
Pettersson, R. [> >]
Moholdt, G. [> >]
Nuth, C. [> >]
Sass, B. [> >]
Aas, Kjetil [> >]
Fettweis, Xavier mailto [Université de Liège > Département de géographie > Climatologie et Topoclimatologie >]
Lang, Charlotte mailto [Université de Liège > Département de géographie > Climatologie et Topoclimatologie >]
Seehaus, T. [> >]
Braun, M. [> >]
1-Sep-2017
Cryosphere
Copernicus
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
1994-0416
1994-0424
Katlenberg-Lindau
Germany
[en] The basal topography is largely unknown beneath most glaciers and ice caps, and many attempts have been made to estimate a thickness field from other more accessible information at the surface. Here, we present a two-step reconstruction approach for ice thickness that solves mass conservation over single or several connected drainage basins. The approach is applied to a variety of test geometries with abundant thickness measurements including marine- and land-terminating glaciers as well as a 2400 km2 ice cap on Svalbard. The input requirements are kept to a minimum for the first step. In this step, a geometrically controlled, non-local flux solution is converted into thickness values relying on the shallow ice approximation (SIA). In a second step, the thickness field is updated along fast-flowing glacier trunks on the basis of velocity observations. Both steps account for available thickness measurements. Each thickness field is presented together with an error-estimate map based on a formal propagation of input uncertainties. These error estimates point out that the thickness field is least constrained near ice divides or in other stagnant areas. Withholding a share of the thickness measurements, error estimates tend to overestimate mismatch values in a median sense. We also have to accept an aggregate uncertainty of at least 25 % in the reconstructed thickness field for glaciers with very sparse or no observations. For Vestfonna ice cap (VIC), a previous ice volume estimate based on the same measurement record as used here has to be corrected upward by 22 %. We also find that a 13 % area fraction of the ice cap is in fact grounded below sea level. The former 5 % estimate from a direct measurement interpolation exceeds an aggregate maximum range of 6–23 % as inferred from the error estimates here.
F.R.S.-FNRS - Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique ; CECi - Consortium des Équipements de Calcul Intensif
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/213940
10.5194/tc-11-2003-2017
https://www.the-cryosphere.net/11/2003/2017/

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
tc-11-2003-2017.pdfPublisher postprint25.31 MBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.