Aasim M, Umer EM, Karim A. 2008. Yield and competition indices of intercropping cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) using different planting patterns. Tarim Bilimleri Dergisi. 14:326–333.
Achigan DGE, Fanou N, Kouke A, Avohou H, Vodouhe RS, Ahanchede A. 2006. Evaluation agronomique de trois espèces de Egusi (Cucurbitaceae) utilisées dans l’alimentation au Bénin et élaboration d’un modèle de prédiction du rendement. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 10:121–129.
Achu MB, Fokou E, Tchiégang C, Fotso M, Tchouanguep FM. 2005. Nutritive value of some Cucurbitaceae oilseeds from different regions in Cameroon. Afr J Biotechnol. 4:1329–1334.
Adeniyan ON, Aluko OA, Olanipekun SO, Olasoji JO, Aduramigba-Modupe VO. 2014. growth and yield performance of cassava/maize intercrop under different plant population density of maize. J Agric Sci. 6:35–40.
Altieri MA. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 74:19–31.
Awal MA, Pramanik MHR, Hossen MA. 2007. Interspecies competition, growth and yield in barley-peanut intercropping. Asian J Plant Sci. 6:577–584.
Banik P. 1996. Evaluation of wheat (T. aestivum) and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 2:1 row-replacement series system. J Agron Crop Sci. 176:289–294.
Banik P, Sasmal T, Ghosal PK, Bagchi DK. 2000. Evaluation of mustard (Brassica campestris var. Toria) and legume intercropping under 1:1 and 2:1 row-replacement series systems. J Agron Crop Sci. 185:9–14.
Biareh V, Sayfzadeh S, Daneshian J, Yousefi M, Shiriyan M. 2013. Evaluation of qualitative traits of corn grains under intercropping of corn and bean systems. J Nov Appl Sci. 2:929–933.
Caballero R, Goicoechea EL, Hernaiz PJ. 1995. Forage yields and quality of common vetch and oat sown at varying seeding ratios and seeding rates of common vetch. Field Crops Res. 41:135–140.
Chimonyo VGP, Modi AT, Mabhaudhi T. 2016. Water use and productivity of a sorghum-cowpea-bottle gourd intercrop system. Agric Water Manage. 165:82–96.
Connolly J, Gomab HC, Rahimc K. 2001. The information content of indicators in intercropping research. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 87:191–207.
Das AK, Khaliq QA, Haider ML. 2012. Efficiency of wheat-lentil and wheat-chickpea intercropping systems at different planting configurations. Int J Sustain Crop Prod. 7:25–33.
De Wit CT. 1960. On competition. Verslag Landbouw-Kundige Onderzoek. 66:1–28.
Dhima KV, Lithourgidis AS, Vasilakoglou IB, Dordas CA. 2007. Competition indices of common vetch and cereal intercropsin two seeding ratio. Field Crops Res. 100:249–256.
Enete AA. 2009. Middlemen and smallholder farmers in cassava marketing in Africa. Tropicultura. 27(1):40–44.
Ghosh PK. 2004. Growth yield competition and economics of groundnut/cereal fodder intercropping systems in the semi-arid tropics of India. Field Crops Res. 88:227–237.
Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Ambus P, Jensen ES. 2001. Interspecific competition, N use and interference with weeds in pea-barley intercropping. Field Crops Res. 70:101–109.
Hidoto L, Loha G. 2013. Identification of suitable legumes in cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)-legumes intercropping. Afr J Agric Res. 8:2559–2562.
Hiebsch CK, McCollum RE. 1987. Area X Time Equivalency Ratio: a method for evaluating the productivity of intercrops. Agron J. 79:15–22.
Howeler R, Lutaladio N, Thomas G. 2013. Save and grow: cassava, food and agriculture. Rome: Organization of the United Nations.
Hyman G, Bellotti A, Lopez-Lavalle LAB, Palmer N, Creamer B. 2012. Cassava and overcoming the challenges of global climatic change: report of the second scientific conference of the Global Cassava Partnership for the 21st century. Food Sec. 4:671–674.
Ijoyah MO, Bwala RI, Iheadindueme CA. 2012. Response of cassava, maize and egusi melon in a three crop intercropping system at Makurdi, Nigeria. Int J Dev Sustain. 1:135–144.
Islami T, Guritno B, Utomo WH. 2011. Performance of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) based cropping systems and associated soil quality changes in the degraded tropical uplands of East Java, Indonesia. J Trop Agri. 49:31–39.
Jamshidi KH. 2011. Evaluation of quantity and quality of the yield of two wheat cultivars in intercropping system. Desert. 16:153–158.
Kouassi NJ, Zoro Bi IA. 2010. Effect of sowing density and seedbed type on yield and yield components in bambara groundnut (Vigna subterranea) in woodland savana of Côte d’Ivoire. Exp Agric. 46:99–110.
Li L, Sun J, Zhang F, Li X, Yang S, Rengel Z. 2001. Wheat/maize or wheat/soybean strip intercropping: I. yield advantage and interspecific interactions on nutrients. Field Crop Res. 71:123–137.
Mandumbu R, Karavina C. 2012. Weed Suppression and Component Crops Response in Maize/Pumpkin Intercropping Systems in Zimbabwe. J Agric Sci. 4:213–236.
Mbah EU, Muoneke CO, Okpara DA. 2008. Evaluation of cassava Manihot esculenta (Crantz) planting methods and soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) sowing dates on the yield performance of the component species in cassava/soybean intercrop under the humid tropical lowlands of southeastern Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol. 8:42–47.
Mbah EU, Ogidi E. 2012. Effect of soybean plant populations on yield and productivity of cassava and soybean grown in a cassava-based intercropping system. Trop Subtrop Agroecosyst. 15:241–248.
McGilchrist CA. 1965. Analysis of competition experiments. Biometrics. 21:975–985.
Mead R, Willey RW. 1980. The concept of a land equivalent ratio and advantages in yields for intercropping. Exp Agric. 16:217–228.
Midya A, Bhattacharjee K, Ghose SS, Banik P. 2005. Deferred seeding of blackgram (Phaseolus mungo L.) in rice (Oryza sativa L.) field on yield advantages and smothering of weeds. J Agron Crop Sci. 191:195–201.
Muyayabantu GM, Kadiata BD, Nkongolo KK. 2013. Assessing the effects of integrated soil fertility management on biological efficiency and economic advantages of intercropped maize (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) in DR Congo. Am J Exp Agric. 3:520–541.
Nassab MDA, Amonb T, Kaul H-P. 2011. Competition and yield in intercrops of maize and sunflower for biogas. Ind Crops Prod. 34:1203–1211.
Nyi T, Mucheru-Muna M, Shisanya C, Lama LJ-P, Mutuo PK, Pypers P, Vanlauwe B. 2014. Effect of delayed cassava planting on yields and economic returns of a cassava-groundnut intercrop in the Democratic Republic of Congo. World J Agric Res. 2:101–108.
Oroka FO. 2012. Water hyacinth-based vermicompost on yield, yield components, and yield advantage of cassava+groundnut intercropping system. J Trop Agric. 50:49–52.
Rezaei-Chianeh E, Nassab ADM, Shakiba MR, Ghassemi-Golezani K, Aharizad S, Shekari F. 2011. Intercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and faba bean (Vicia faba L.) at different plant population densities. Afr J Agric Res. 6:1786–1793.
SAS. 2004. SAS for Windows Cary (NC): SAS Institute.
Uddin MKB, Naznin S, Kawochar MA, Choudhury RU, Awal MA. 2014. Productivity of wheat and peanut in intercropping system. J Expt Biosci. 5:19–26.
Wahla IH, Ahmad R, Ehsanullah AA, Jabbar A. 2009. Competitive functions of components crops in some barley based intercropping systems. Int J Agric Biol. 11:69–71.
Weigelt A, Jolliffe P. 2003. Indices of plant competition. J Ecol. 91:707–720.
Willey RW, Osiru DSO. 1972. Studies on mixtures of maize and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) with particular reference to plant population. J Agric Sci. 79:517–529.
Willey RW, Rao MR. 1980. A competitive ratio for quantifying competition between intercrops. Exp Agric. 16:117–125.
Yahuza I. 2011. Review of some methods of calculating intercrop efficiencies with particular reference to the estimates of intercrop benefits in wheat/faba bean system. Int J Biosci. 1:18–30.
Zhang G, Yang Z, Dong S. 2011. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crops Res. doi:10.1016/j.fcr.2011.06.006
Zoro Bi IA, Koffi KK, Djè Y. 2003. Caractérisation botanique et agronomique de trois espèces de cucurbites consommées en sauce en Afrique de l’Ouest: Citrullus sp., Cucumeropsis mannii Naudin et Lagenaria siceraria (Molina) Standl. Biotechnol Agron Soc Environ. 7:189–199.
Zoro Bi IA, Koffi KK, Djè Y, Malice M, Baudoin J-P. 2006. Indigenous cucurbits of Côte d’Ivoire: a review of their genetic resources. Sci Nat. 3:1–9.
