Article (Scientific journals)
Testing a general approach to assess the degree of disturbance in tropical forests
Sellan, Giacomo; Simini, Filippo; Maritan, Amos et al.
2017In Journal of Vegetation Science, 28 (3), p. 459–668
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Sellan et al. - 2017.pdf
Publisher postprint (8.94 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Allometric relationships; Crown volume; Finite size scaling; Operationalization; Restoration strategies; Tree size distribution; Tropical ecology
Abstract :
[en] Questions: Is there any theoretical model enabling predictions of the optimal tree size distribution in tropical communities? Can we use such a theoretical framework for quantifying the degree of disturbance? Location: Reserve of Yangambi, northeast region of the Democratic Republic of Congo. Methods: We applied an allometricmodel based on the assumption that a vir- tually undisturbed forest uses all available resources. In this condition, the forest structure (e.g. the tree size distribution) is theoretically predictable fromthe scal- ing of the tree crown with tree height at an individual level. The degree of dis- turbance can be assessed through comparing the slopes of the tree size distribution curves in the observed and predicted conditions. We tested this tool in forest stands subjected to different degrees of disturbance. We inventoried trees >1.3 m in height by measuring the DBH in three plots of 1 ha each, and measured tree height, crownradius and crownlength in a sub-sample of trees. Results: All tree species, independently of the site, shared the same exponents of allometric relationships: tree height vs tree diameter, crown radius vs tree height, crown length vs tree height and consequently crown volume vs tree height, suggesting that similar trajectories of biomass allocation have evolved irrespective of species. The observed tree size distributions appeared to be power laws (excluding the finite size effect) and, as predicted, the slope was steeper in the less disturbed forest (?2.34) compared to the most disturbed (?1.99). The difference in the slope compared to the theoretical fully functional forest (?2.65) represents the metric for assessing the degree of disturbance. Conclusions: We developed a simple tool for operationalizing the concept of ‘disturbance’ in tropical forests. This approach is species-independent, needs minimal theoretical assumptions, the measurement of only a few structural traits and requires a low investment in equipment, time and computer skills. Its simple implementation opens new perspectives for effectively addressing initiatives of forest protection and/or restoration.
Disciplines :
Environmental sciences & ecology
Author, co-author :
Sellan, Giacomo;  Manchester Metropolitan University > School of Science and the Environment
Simini, Filippo;  University of Bristol > Department of Engineering Mathematics
Maritan, Amos;  University of Padova > Dipartimento di Fisica ‘G. Galilei’ > CNISM and INFN
Banavar, Jayanth R.;  University of Maryland > Department of Physics
de Haulleville, Thalès ;  Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Biodiversité et paysage
Bauters, Marijn;  Ghent University > Isotope Bioscience Laboratory–ISOFYS
Doucet, Jean-Louis  ;  Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Laboratoire de Foresterie des régions trop. et subtropicales
Beeckman, Hans;  Royal Museum for Central Africa > Laboratoire de biologie du bois
Anfodillo, Tommaso;  University of Padova > Dipartimento Territorio e Sistemi Agro- Forestali
Language :
English
Title :
Testing a general approach to assess the degree of disturbance in tropical forests
Publication date :
May 2017
Journal title :
Journal of Vegetation Science
ISSN :
1100-9233
eISSN :
1654-1103
Publisher :
Opulus Press
Volume :
28
Issue :
3
Pages :
459–668
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 24 May 2017

Statistics


Number of views
88 (28 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
11 (6 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
10
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
6
OpenCitations
 
10
OpenAlex citations
 
11

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi