Article (Scientific journals)
Comparative modals (Dis)similar diachronic tendencies
Van linden, An
2015In Functions of Language, 22 (2), p. 192-231
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
AVL_2015FOL_comparativemodals_final.pdf
Author postprint (541.14 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Abstract :
[en] This article examines modal expressions with the comparative adverbs better, rather and sooner in American English, and assesses to what extent they have grammaticalized. The corpus data offer evidence that the three comparative modal groups exhibit considerable phonetic reduction in the 1810-2009 period studied. Analysis of several aspects of the constructions, such as subject types, temporal reference and comparative meaning, reveals which conditions promoted this erosion. However, the data also indicate that the three groups are semantically and constructionally quite heterogeneous. In fact, this article proposes a grammaticalization scenario for the rather and sooner structures that is different from the one posited for the better structures.
Disciplines :
Languages & linguistics
Author, co-author :
Van linden, An  ;  Katholieke Universiteit Leuven - KUL
Title :
Comparative modals (Dis)similar diachronic tendencies
Publication date :
2015
Journal title :
Functions of Language
ISSN :
0929-998X
Publisher :
John Benjamins Publishing Co, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Volume :
22
Issue :
2
Pages :
192-231
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Name of the research project :
1.2.767.11.N.00
Funders :
FWO - Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen [BE]
Research Council of the University of Leuven [GOA/12/007]
Commentary :
The research reported on in this article has been made possible by the Research Foundation Flanders - FWO (postdoctoral grant 1.2.767.11.N.00) and the Research Council of the University of Leuven (project GOA/12/007). I thank Kristin Davidse and Jean-Christophe Verstraete as well as two anonymous referees of Functions of Language and editor Geoffrey Thompson for useful comments on an earlier version of this article.
Available on ORBi :
since 22 May 2017

Statistics


Number of views
68 (4 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
125 (2 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
1
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
1
OpenCitations
 
39

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi