ORBi: Detailled Reference

Article (Scientific journals)

Dynamic of soil drying close to saturation: What can we learn from a comparison between X-ray computed microtomography and the evaporation method?

Parvin, Nargish; Beckers, Eléonore; Plougonven, Erwan et al.

2017 • In Geoderma, 302

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Permalink
https://hdl.handle.net/2268/210394

DOI
10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.04.027

Files (1)Send to Details Statistics Bibliography Similar publications

Files

Full Text

1-s2.0-S001670611730023X-main.pdf

Publisher postprint (943.01 kB)

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to

RIS BibTex APA Chicago Permalink X Linkedin

Details

Keywords :

Soil water retention curve; X-ray CT; Evaporation method

Abstract :

[en] The soil water retention curve (SWRC) is a unique relationship between water content and soil water potential. SWRC in near saturation gives the dimension of soil macroporosity which plays an important role in water translocation into soil. Thus, the accurate measurement of SWRC is crucial. The aim of this study is to compare SWRC obtained through two different methods: X-ray computed microtomography (X-ray CT) and evaporation method by HYPROP device. Three different depths (0–10, 25–30 and 45–60 cm) are considered for soil sampling. The results showed significant differences in SWRC between the techniques. The SWRC from X-ray CT showed more volumetric water content at 25–30 cm (0.044) and 45–60 cm (0.024) than evaporation at saturation (0 kPa) in cases where the macroporosity was higher. Macropores may have connections with neighbouring pores of smaller sizes. Hence we assume that these pores can be observed through X-ray CT but cannot be evaluated by evaporation. As macropores with narrow opening do not evaporate at very low tension. These pores therefore got empty at relatively higher tension. Consequently, SWRC near saturation appeared rather flatter with the evaporation method where the X-ray CT presented deviation. Accordingly, interpretation of macro pores from SWRC through evaporation method would give comparatively smaller volume of macropores than they really are. Pore morphology and other hydraulic functions of soil, for example, mean connection surface of pores, hydraulic conductivity, and the efficiency of water conducting macropores also support the X-ray CT findings.

Disciplines :

Agriculture & agronomy

Author, co-author :

Parvin, Nargish ; Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Echanges Eau-Sol-Plantes

Beckers, Eléonore ; Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Echanges Eau-Sol-Plantes

Plougonven, Erwan ; Université de Liège > Department of Chemical Engineering > Génie chimique - Procédés et développement durable

Léonard, Angélique ; Université de Liège > Department of Chemical Engineering > Génie chimique - Procédés et développement durable

Degré, Aurore ; Université de Liège > Ingénierie des biosystèmes (Biose) > Echanges Eau-Sol-Plantes

Language :

English

Title :

Dynamic of soil drying close to saturation: What can we learn from a comparison between X-ray computed microtomography and the evaporation method?

Publication date :

10 May 2017

Journal title :

Geoderma

ISSN :

0016-7061

eISSN :

1872-6259

Publisher :

Elsevier Science

Volume :

302

Peer reviewed :

Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi

Available on ORBi :

since 10 May 2017

Statistics

Number of views

108 (22 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

9 (5 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

8

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

6

OpenCitations

6

OpenAlex citations

9

Bibliography

Allaire-Leung, S.E., Gupta, S.C., Moncrief, J.F., Water and solute movement in soil as influenced by macropore characteristics: 2. Macropore tortuosity. J. Contam. Hydrol. 41 (2000), 303–315.
Allaire-Leung, S.E., Gupta, S.C., Nieber, J., Moncrief, J.F., J. Contam. Hydrol. 58:3–4 (2002), 299–321, 10.1016/S0169-7722(02)00035-9.
Anderson, S.H., Peyton, R.L., Gantzer, C.J., Evaluation of constructed and natural soil macropores using X-ray computed tomography. Geoderma 46 (1990), 13–29, 10.1016/0016-7061(90)90004-S.
Barbour, S.L., The soil-water characteristic curve: a historical perspective. Nineteenth Canadian geotechnical colloquium. Can. Geotech. J. 35 (1998), 873–894.
Bayer, A., Vogel, H.-J., Roth, K., Direct measurement of the soil water retention curve using X-ray absorption. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 8 (2004), 2–7.
Beckers, E., Plougonven, E., Gigot, N., Léonard, A., Roisin, C., Brostaux, Y., Degré, A., Coupling X-ray microtomography and macroscopic soil measurements: a method to enhance near-saturation functions?. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 2014, 1805, 10.5194/hess-18-1805-2014.
Beckers, E., Plougonven, E., Roisin, C., Hapca, S., Léonard, A., Degré, A., X-ray microtomography: a porosity-based thresholding method to improve soil pore network characterization. Geoderma 219–220 (2014), 145–154, 10.1016/j.geoderma.2014.01.004.
Beraldo, J.M.G., Scannavino, F. de A. Jr., Cruvinel, P.E., Application of x-ray computed tomography in the evaluation of soil porosity in soil management systems. Engenharia Agrícola 34 (2014), 1162–1174, 10.1590/S0100-69162014000600012.
Beven, K., Germann, P., Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resour. Res. 18 (1982), 1311–1325, 10.1029/WR018i005p01311.
Bodhinayake, W., Si, B.C., Xiao, C., New method for determining water-conducting macro- and mesoporosity from tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 68, 2004, 760, 10.2136/sssaj2004.7600.
BOUMA, J., Measuring the conductivity of soil horizons with continuous macropores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 46 (1982), 438–441 (Madison).
Brown, J.M., Fonteno, W.C., Cassel, D.K., Johnson, G.A., Computed tomographic analyses of water distribution in three porous foam media. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51 (1987), 1121–1125.
Burdine, N.T., Relative permeability calculations from pore size distribution data. J. Pet. Technol. 5 (1953), 71–78, 10.2118/225-G.
Dathe, A., Eins, S., Niemeyer, J., Gerold, G., The surface fractal dimension of the soil–pore interface as measured by image analysis. Geoderma 103 (2001), 203–229.
Diamantopoulos, E., Iden, S.C., Durner, W., Inverse modeling of dynamic nonequilibrium in water flow with an effective approach. Water Resour. Res., 48, 2012, W03503, 10.1029/2011WR010717.
DIN ISO 11274, Soil quality – Determination of the water retention characteristics – Laboratory methods (ISO 11274:1998+Cor. 1:2009) English translation of DIN ISO 11274:2012-04. 2012, Deutsches Institut für Normung, Berlin, Germany.
Durner, W., Hydraulic conductivity estimation for soils with heterogeneous pore structure. Water Resour. Res. 30 (1994), 211–223, 10.1029/93WR02676.
Faybishenko, B.A., Hydraulic behavior of quasi-saturated soils in the presence of entrapped air: laboratory experiments. Water Resour. Res. 31 (1995), 2421–2435, 10.1029/95WR01654.
Fredlund, D.G., The implementation of unsaturated soil mechanics into geotechnical engineering, the 1999 R.M. Hardy lecture. Can. Geotech. J. 37:5 (2000), 963–986, 10.1139/t00-026.
Fredlund, D.G., Rahardjo, H., Soil Mechanics for Unsaturated Soils. 1993, John Wiley & Sons.
Gardner, W.R., Miklich, F.J., Unsaturated conductivity and diffusivity measurements by a constant flux method. Soil Sci. 93 (1962), 271–274.
Glossary of Soil Science Terms, ASA-CSSA-SSSA. 2008, 10.2136/2008.
Green, T.R., Ahuja, L.R., Benjamin, J.G., Advances and challenges in predicting agricultural management effects on soil hydraulic properties. Geoderma 116 (2003), 3–27, 10.1016/S0016–7061(03)00091-0.
Hoag, R.S., Price, J.S., The effects of matrix diffusion on solute transport and retardation in undisturbed peat in laboratory columns. J. Contam. Hydrol. 28 (1997), 193–205, 10.1016/S0169–7722(96)00085-X.
Hopmans, J.W., Vogel, T., Koblik, P.D., X-ray tomography of soil water distribution in one-step outflow experiments. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56 (1992), 355–362.
Imhoff, S., Ghiberto, P.J., Grioni, A., Gay, J.P., Porosity characterization of Argiudolls under different management systems in the Argentine Flat Pampa. Geoderma 158 (2010), 268–274.
IUSS Working Group WRB, World reference base for soil resources 2006, first update 2007. World Soil Resources Reports No 103, 2007, FAO, Rome available at www.fao.org/ag/agl/agll/wrb/doc/wrb2007_corr.pdf.
Jarvis, N.J., A review of non-equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 58 (2007), 523–546, 10.1111/j.1365–2389.2007.00915.x.
Iassonov, P., Gebrenegus, T., Tuller, M., Segmentation of X-ray computed tomography images of porous materials: A crucial step for characterization and quantitative analysis of pore structures. Water Resour. Res., 45, 2009, W09415, 10.1029/2009WR008087.
Lawrence, J.E., Hornberger, G.M., Soil moisture variability across climate zones. Geophys. Res. Lett., 34(L20402), 2007, L20402, 10.1029/2007GL031382.
Lin, H., Bouma, J., Wilding, L.P., Richardson, J.L., Kutílek, M., Nielsen, D.R., Advances in Hydropedology. Adv. Agron. 85 (2005), 1–89, 10.1016/S0065–2113(04)85001-6.
Luckner, L., Van Genuchten, M.T., Nielsen, D.R., A consistent set of parametric models for the two-phase flow of immiscible fluids in the subsurface. Water Resour. Res. 25 (1989), 2187–2193, 10.1029/WR025i010p02187.
Mualem, Y., Catalogue of the Hydraulic Properties of Unsaturated Soils. 1976, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Technion Research and Development Foundation.
Naveed, M., Moldrup, P., Arthur, E., Wildenschild, D., Eden, M., Lamandé, M., Vogel, H.-J., de Jonge, L.W., Revealing soil structure and functional macroporosity along a clay gradient using X-ray computed tomography. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 77 (2013), 403–411.
Nimmo, J.R., Porosity and pore size distribution. Hillel, D., (eds.) Encyclopedia of Soils in the Environment, Vol. 3, 2004, Elsevier, London, 295–303.
Française, Norme, Détermination en laboratoire du coefficient de perméabilité à saturation d'un matériau. DNF X-30-441, 2008 (ISSN 0335–3931. (In French)).
Parvin, N., Degré, A., Soil-specific calibration of capacitance sensors considering clay content and bulk density. Soil Res. 54 (2016), 111–119, 10.1071/SR15036.
Perret, J., Prasher, S.O., Kantzas, A., Hamilton, K., Langford, C., Preferential solute flow in intact soil columns measured by SPECT scanning. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 64 (2000), 469–477.
Perret, J., Prasher, S.O., Kantzas, A., Langford, C., Three-Dimensional Quantification of Macropore Networks in Undisturbed Soil Cores. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 63, 1999, 1530, 10.2136/sssaj1999.6361530x.
Peth, S., Horn, R., Beckmann, F., Donath, T., Fischer, J., Smucker, A.J.M., Three-Dimensional Quantification of Intra-Aggregate Pore-Space Features using Synchrotron-Radiation-Based Microtomography. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72, 2008, 897, 10.2136/sssaj2007.0130.
Peters, A., Durner, W., Simplified evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties. J. Hydrol. 356:1–2 (2008), 147–162, 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.04.016.
Pires, L.F., Borges, J.A.R., Bacchi, O.O.S., Reichardt, K., Twenty-five years of computed tomography in soil physics: a literature review of the Brazilian contribution. Soil Tillage Res. 110 (2010), 197–210, 10.1016/j.still.2010.07.013.
Plougonven, E., Link Between the Microstructure of Porous Materials and Their Permeability (PhDThesis). 2009, Université Sciences et Technologies - Bordeaux I.
Plougonven, E., Bernard, D., Optimal removal of topological artifacts in microtomographic images of porous materials. Adv. Water Resour. 34 (2011), 731–736, 10.1016/j.advwatres.2011.03.004.
Richards, L.A., Porous plate apparatus for measuring moisture retention and transmission by soils. Soil Sci. 66 (1948), 105–110.
Richard, G., Cousin, I., Sillon, J.F., Bruand, A., Guerif, J., Effect of compaction on the porosity of a silty soil: influence on unsaturated hydraulic properties. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 52 (2001), 49–58.
Reicosky, D.C., Voorhees, W.B., Radke, J.K., unsaturated water flow through a simulated wheel track. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 45 (1981), 3–8.
Rezanezhad, F., Quinton, W.L., Price, J.S., Elrick, D., Elliot, T.R., Heck, R.J., Examining the effect of pore size distribution and shape on flow through unsaturated peat using 3-D computed tomography. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss. 6 (2009), 3835–3862.
Schindler, U., Müller, L., Simplifying the evaporation method for quantifying soil hydraulic properties. J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. 169 (2006), 623–629.
Šimůnek, J., Wendroth, O., van Genuchten, M.Th., Parameter estimation analysis of the evaporation method for determining soil hydraulic properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62 (1998), 894–905, 10.1002/jpln.200521895.
Taina, I.A., Heck, R.J., Elliot, T.R., Application of X-ray computed tomography to soil science: a literature review. Can. J. Soil Sci. 88 (2008), 1–20.
Tarantino, A., Ridley, A.M., Toll, D.G., Field measurement of suction, water content, and water permeability. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 26 (2008), 751–782, 10.1007/s10706–008–9205-4.
Watson, K.W., Luxmoore, R.J., Estimating macroporosity in a forest watershed by use of a tension infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 50 (1986), 578–582, 10.2136/sssaj1986.03615995005000030007x.
Wendroth, O., Ehlers, W., Hopmans, J.W., Kage, H., Halbertsma, J., Wösten, J.H.M., Reevaluation of the evaporation method for determining hydraulic functions in unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57 (1993), 1436–1443.
Wind, G.P., Capillary conductivity data estimated by a simple method. Rijtema, P.E., Wassink, H., (eds.) Water in the Unsaturated Zone Proc. Wageningen Symp. June 1966, Vol. 1, 1968, IASAH, Gentbrugge, Belgium, 181–191.
Young, I.M., Crawford, J., Rappoldt, C., New methods and models for characterising structural heterogeneity of soil. Soil Tillage Res. 61 (2001), 33–45.
Youngs, E.G., Peck, A.J., Moisture profile development and air compression during water uptake by bounded porous bodies: 1. Theoretical introduction. Soil Sci. 98 (1964), 290–294.
Zhang, R., Determination of Soil Sorptivity and Hydraulic Conductivity from the Disk Infiltrometer. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61 (1997), 1024–1030, 10.2136/sssaj1997.03615995006100040005x.

Similar publications