Eucera; pollination; heat reward; male solitary bees; sheltering; Xylocopa
Abstract :
[en] Pollination systems based on indirect rewards, such as heat and shelter, have seldom been studied. Plant-pollinator interactions were characterized in Iris cedretii Dinsmore ex Chaudhary and Iris sofarana subsp. kasruwana Dinsmore ex Chaudhary, rare endemic Lebanese Oncocyclus irises exhibiting potential adaptation to shelter pollination. Despite a diversity of floral visitors (47 species), only two groups of Anthophoridae male bees (Xylocopa spp. and Eucera spp.) could be considered as efficient pollinators on the basis of frequency of visits, visiting behaviour, and pollen load. Lebanese Oncocyclus irises showed a bimodal pollination system with (1) diurnal visits at low rates but with potentially large pollen transfers by Xylocopa bees, exhibiting a foraging-like behaviour, principally during warm periods of the day and (2) sheltering, especially Eucera male bees, during night and day when the weather is changeable. Refuge occurrence in flowers was more important during the night (27%) than during the day (12%) and, for daytime, during cloudy or windy than sunny conditions. It also varied depending on the exposure of floral tunnels. Visitation rates of both day-visiting Xylocopa and night-sheltering Eucera were negatively associated with an increase of the number of flowers per clump. No experimental evidence was found showing that the principal advantage for male bees to shelter in Iris flowers was to fly earlier in the morning.
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Avishai, M. 1977. Species relationships and cytogenetic affinities in section Oncocyclus of the genus Iris. Ph.D. thesis, Hebrew University, Jerusalem.
Avishai, M., and Zohary, D. 1980. Genetic affinities among the Oncocyclus irises. Bot. Gaz. 141: 107-115. doi:10.1086/337130.
Beattie, A.J. 1971. A technique for the study of insect-borne pollen. Pan-Pac. Entomol. 47: 82.
Bosch, M., and Waser, N.M. 1999. Effects of local density on pollination and reproduction in Delphinium nuttallianum and Aconitum columbianum (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot. 86: 871-879. doi:10.2307/2656707.
Dafni, A., Ivri, Y., and Brantjes, N.B.M. 1981. Pollination of Serapias vomeracea Briq. (Orchidaceae) by imitation of holes for sleeping solitary male bees (Hymenoptera). Acta Bot. Neerl. 30: 69-73.
Dafni, A., Kevan, P.G., and Husband, B.C. 2005. Practical pollination biology. Enviroquest, Cambridge, UK.
Danforth, B.N., and Neff, J.L. 1992. Male polymorphism and polyethism in Perdita texana (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 85: 616-626.
Emms, S.K., and Arnold, M.L. 2000. Site-to-site differences in pollinator visitation patterns in a Louisiana Iris hybrid zone. Oikos, 91: 568-578. doi:10.1034/j.1600-0706.2000.910319.x.
Faegri, K., and Van Der Pijl, L. 1980. The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd ed. Pergamon Press, Oxford.
Fleming, P.A., and Nicolson, S.W. 2002. How important is the relationship between Protea humiflora (Proteaceae) and its non-flying mammal pollinators? Oecologia, 132: 361-368.
Gaglianone, M.C. 2000. Behavior on flowers, structures associated to pollentransport and nesting biology of Perditomorpha brunerii and Cephalourgus anomalus (Hymenoptera: Colletidae, Andrenidae). Rev. Biol. Trop. 48: 89-99.
Galen, C., and Stanton, M.L. 2003. Sunny-side up: flower heliotropism as a source of parental environmental effects on pollen quality and performance in the snow buttercup, Ranunculus adoneus (Ranunculaceae). Am. J. Bot. 90: 724-729.
Gibernau, M., Barabé, D., Cerdan, P., and Dejean, A. 1999. Beetle pollination of Philodendron solimoesense (Araceae) in French Guiana. Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 1135-1143. doi:10.1086/314195
Grindeland, J.M., Sletvold, N., and Ims, R.A. 2005. Effects of floral display size and plant density on pollinator visitation rate in a natural population of Digitalis purpurea. Funct. Ecol. 19: 383-390. doi:10.1111/j.1365- 2435.2005.00988.x.
Groom, M.J. 1998. Allee effects limit population viability of an annual plant. Am. Nat. 151: 487-496. doi:10.1086/286135.
Heinrich, B., and Raven, P.H. 1972. Energetics and pollination ecology. Science (Washington, D.C.), 176: 597-602. doi:10.1126/science.176.4035.597.
Herrera, C.M., and Pellmyr, O. 2002. Plant-animal interactions. An evolutionary approach. Blackwell Science, Oxford.
Horovitz, A. 1976. Edaphic factors and flower color distribution in the Anemonae (Ranunculaceae). Plant Syst. Evol. 126: 239-242. doi:10.1007/ BF00983363.
International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN). 2000. Red list of threatened species [online]. The IUCN Species Survival Commission (Editors). IUCN, Cambridge. Available from www.redlist.org.
Ishii, H.S., and Sakai, S. 2001. Implications of geitonogamous pollination for floral longevity in Iris gracilipes. Funct. Ecol. 15: 633-641. doi:10.1046/j.0269-8463.2001.00560.x.
Jacquemart, A.L. 1993. Floral visitors of Vaccinium species in the High Ardennes, Belgium. Flora, 188: 263-273.
Kearns, C.A. 2001. North American Dipteran pollinators: assessing their value and conservation status. Conserv. Ecol. 5: 5.
Kearns, C.A., and Inouye, D.W. 1993 Techniques for pollination biologists. University Press of Colorado, Niwot, Colorado.
Kearns, C.A., Inouye, D.W., and Waser, N.M. 1998. Endangered mutualisms: the conservation of plant-pollinator interactions. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 29: 83-112. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.29.1.83.
Kevan, P.G. 1975. Sun-tracking solar furnaces in High Artic flowers: significance for pollination and insects. Science (Washington, D.C.), 189: 723-726.
Kevan, P.G. 2001. Pollination: Plinth, pedestal, and pillar for terrestrial productivity. The why, how, and where of pollination protection, conservation, and promotion. In Bees and crop pollination - Crisis, crossroads, conservation. Edited by C.S. Stubbs and F.A. Drummond. Thomas Say Publications in Entomology, Entomological Society of America, Lanham, Md. pp. 7-68.
Kevan, P.G., and Baker, H.G. 1983. Insects as flower visitors and pollinators. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 28: 407-453. doi:10.1146/annurev.en.28.010183. 002203.
Kirchner, F., Luijten, S.H., Imbert, E., Riba, M., Mayol, M., González-Martinez, C., Mignot, A., and Colas, B. 2005. Effects of local density on insect visitation and fertilization success in the narrow-endemic Centaurea corymbosa (Asteraceae). Oikos, 111: 130-142. doi:10.1111/j.0030-1299. 2005.14022.x.
Lindsey, A.H. 1984. Reproductive biology of Apiaceae. I. Floral visitors to Thaspium and Zizza and their importance in pollination. Am. J. Bot. 71: 375-387. doi:10.2307/2443496.
Mahy, G., and Jacquemart, A.L. 1998. Mating system of Calluna vulgaris: self-sterility and outcrossing estimations. Can. J. Bot. 76: 36-42.
Mathew, B. 1989. The Iris. Batsford, London.
Michener, C.D. 2000. The bees of the world. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Md.
Minitab. 2000. MINITAB 13.1. Minitab, State College, Penn.
Molina-Freaner, F., Rojas-Martinez, A., Fleming, T.H., and Valiente-Banuet, A. 2004. Pollination biology of the columnar cactus Pachycereus pectin-arboriginum in north-western México. J. Arid Environ. 56: 117-127. doi:10.1016/S0140-1963(02)00323-3.
Nilsson, L.A. 1988. The evolution of flowers with deep corolla tubes. Nature (London), 334: 147-149. doi:10.1038/334147a0.
Passarelli, L., and Bruzzone, L. 2004. Significance of floral colour and scent in three Solanum sect. Cyphomandropsis species (Solanaceae) with different floral rewards. Aust. J. Bot. 52: 659-667. doi:10.1071/BT03008.
Proctor, M., and Yeo, P. 1973. The pollination of flowers. Collins, London.
Rix, M. 1997. Section Oncocyclus. In A guide to species irises. The Species Group of the British Iris Society (Editor). Cambridge Press, London. pp. 62-89.
Sapir, Y., and Shmida, A. 2002. Species concepts and ecogeographical divergence of Oncocyclus irises. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 49: 229-235.
Sapir, Y., Shmida, A., Fragman, O., and Comes, P. 2002. Morphological variation of the oncocyclus Irises in the Southern Levant. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 139: 369-382. doi:10.1046/j.1095-8339.2002.00067.x.
Sapir, Y., Shmida, A., and Ne'eman, G. 2005. Pollination of Oncocyclus irises (Iris: Iridaceae) by night-sheltering male bees. Plant Biol. 7: 417-424. doi:10.1055/s-2005-837709.
Seymour, R.S., and Schultze-Motel, P. 1997. Heat-producing flowers. Endeavour, 21: 125-129. doi:10.1016/S0160-9327(97)80222-0.
Seymour, R.S., White, C.R., and Gibernau, M. 2003. Heat reward for insect pollinators. Nature (London), 426: 243-244. doi:10.1038/426243a.
Sokal, R.R., and Rohlf, F.J. 2003. Biometry. 3rd ed. W.H. Freeman & Co., New York.
Tarasjev, A. 2005. Impact of genet size and flowering stage on fruit set in Iris pumila L. clones in wild. Acta Oecol. 27: 93-98. doi:10.1016/j.actao. 2004.09.007.
Thien, L.B., Azuma, H., and Kawano, S. 2000. New perspectives on the pollination biology of basal angiosperms. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161: S225-S235. doi:10.1086/317575.
Totland, O. 1996. Flower heliotropism in an alpine population of Ranunculus acris (Ranunculaceae): effects on flower temperature, insect visitation, and seed production. Am. J. Bot. 83: 452-458. doi:10.2307/2446214.
Willis, D.S., and Kevan, P.G. 1995. Foraging dynamics of Peponapis pruinosa (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae) on pumpkin (Cucurbita pepo) in southern Ontario. Can. Entomol. 127: 167-175.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.
