Towards a chromatographic similarity index to establish localized quantitative structure-retention models for retention prediction: Use of retention factor ratio
Tyteca, Eva; Talebi, M.; Amos, R.et al.
2017 • In Journal of Chromatography. A, 1486, p. 50-58
Tyteca, Eva ; Université de Liège > Agronomie, Bio-ingénierie et Chimie (AgroBioChem) > Analyse, qual. et risques - Labo. de Chimie analytique
Talebi, M.; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Australia
Amos, R.; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Australia
Park, S. H.; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Australia
Taraji, M.; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Australia
Wen, Y.; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Australia
Szucs, R.; Pfizer Global Research and Development, Sandwich, United Kingdom
Pohl, C. A.; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Sunnyvale, CA, United States
Dolan, J. W.; LC Resources Inc., 1795 NW Wallace Rd, McMinnville, OR, United States
Haddad, P. R.; Australian Centre for Research on Separation Science (ACROSS), School of Physical Sciences-Chemistry, University of Tasmania, Private Bag 75, Hobart, Australia
Title :
Towards a chromatographic similarity index to establish localized quantitative structure-retention models for retention prediction: Use of retention factor ratio
Publication date :
2017
Journal title :
Journal of Chromatography. A
ISSN :
0021-9673
eISSN :
1873-3778
Publisher :
Elsevier B.V.
Volume :
1486
Pages :
50-58
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Name of the research project :
LP120200700
Funders :
ARC - Australian Research Council [AU] FWO - Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek Vlaanderen [BE]
[1] Davis, J.M., Giddings, J.C., Statistical theory of component overlap in multicomponent chromatograms. Anal. Chem. 55 (1983), 418–424.
[2] Molnár, I., Computerized design of separation strategies by reversed-phase liquid chromatography: development of DryLab software. J. Chromatogr. A 965 (2002), 175–194.
[3] Goga-Remont, S., Heinisch, S., Rocca, J.L., Use of optimization software to determine rugged analysis conditions in high-performance liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. 868 (2000), 13–29.
[4] Beinert, W., Eckert, V., Kgaa, M., Galushko, S., Tanchuk, V., Shishkina, I., Method development: a step forward with innovative software technology, LC-GC Eur. On Line Suppl. 3 (2001), 34–38.
[5] Tyrkkö, E., Pelander, A., Ojanperä, I., Prediction of liquid chromatographic retention for differentiation of structural isomers. Anal. Chim. Acta 720 (2012), 142–148.
[6] Tyteca, E., Liekens, A., Clicq, D., Fanigliulo, A., Debrus, B., Rudaz, S., Guillarme, D., Desmet, G., Predictive elution window shifting and stretching as a generic search strategy for automated method development for liquid chromatography. Anal. Chem. 84 (2012), 7823–7830.
[7] Torres-Lapasio, J.R., Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, M.C., Levels in the interpretive optimisation of selectivity in high-performance liquid chromatography: a magical mystery tour. J. Chromatogr. A 1120 (2006), 308–321.
[8] De Beer, M., Lynen, F., Chen, K., Ferguson, P., Hanna-Brown, M., Sandra, P., Stationary phase optimized selectivity liquid chromatography: development of a linear gradient prediction algorithm. Anal. Chem. 82 (2010), 1733–1743.
[9] Molnar, I., Rieger, H.-J., Chromatography modelling in high performance liquid chromatography method development. Chromatogr. Today, 2013, 3–8 February.
[10] Kormány, R., Fekete, J., Guillarme, D., Fekete, S., Reliability of simulated robustness testing in fast liquid chromatography using state-of-the-art column technology, instrumentation and modelling software. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 89 (2014), 67–75.
[11] Debrus, B., Lebrun, P., Kindenge, J.M., Lecomte, F., Ceccato, A., Caliaro, G., Mavar, J., Tayey Mbay, B., Boulanger, R.D., Marini, E., Rozet, Ph. Hubert, Innovative high-performance liquid chromatography method development for the screening of 19 antimalarial drugs based on a generic approach, using design of experiments, independent component analysis and design space. J. Chromatogr. A 1218 (2011), 5205–5215.
[12] Plotka, J., Tobiszewski, M., Sulej, A.M., Kupska, M., Górecki, T., Namiesnik, J., Green chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1307 (2011), 1–20.
[13] Debrus, B., Guillarme, D., Rudaz, S., Improved quality-by-design compliant methodology for method development in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal. 84 (2013), 215–223.
[14] Kormány, R., Molnar, I., Fekete, J., Guillarme, D., Fekete, S., Robust UHPLC separation method development for multi-API product amlodipine and bisoprolol: the impact of column selection. Chromatographia 77 (2014), 1119–1127.
[15] M. Talebi, S.H. Park, M. Taraji, Y. Wen, R.I.J. Amos, P.R. Haddad, R.A. Shellie, R. Szucs, C.A. Pohl, J.W. Dolan, Retention time prediction based on molecular structure in pharmaceutical method development: A perspective, LCGC (2016).
[16] Bączek, T., Kaliszan, R., Predictive approaches to gradient retention based on analyte structural descriptors from calculation chemistry. J. Chromatogr. A 987 (2003), 29–37.
[17] Kazakevich, Y.V., McBrien, M., LoBrutto, R., Kazakevich, Y.V., LoBrutto, R., (eds.) HPLC for Pharmaceutical Scientists, 2007, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey.
[18] Willet, P., Similarity-based virtual screening using 2D fingerprints. Drug Discov. Today 11 (2006), 1046–1053.
[19] Kubinyi, H., Chemical similarity and biological activities. J. Braz. Chem. Soc. 13 (2002), 717–726.
[20] Willet, P., Chemical similarity searching. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 38 (1998), 983–996.
[21] Eckert, H., Bajorath, J., Molecular similarity analysis in virtual screening: foundations, limitations and novel approaches. Drug Discov. Today 12 (2007), 225–233.
[22] S.D. Pickett, J.S. Mason, I.M. McLay, Diversity profiling and design using 3D pharmacophores: pharmacophore-derived queries (PDQ) 36 (1996) 1214–1223.
[24] Talebi, M., Schuster, G., Shellie, R.A., Szucs, R., Haddad, P.R., Performance comparison of partial least squares-related variable selection methods for quantitative structure retention relationships modelling of retention times in reversed-phase liquid chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1424 (2015), 69–76.
[25] Leardi, R., González, A.L., Genetic algorithms applied to feature selection in PLS regression: how and when to use them. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. 41 (1998), 195–207.
[26] Zuvela, P., Liu, J.J., Macur, K., Bączek, T., Molecular descriptor subset selection in theoretical peptide quantitative structure-retention relationship model development using nature-inspired optimization algorithms. Anal. Chem. 87 (2015), 9876–9883.
[27] Badgett, M.J., Boyes, B., Orlando, R., Prediction of peptide retention times in hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography (HILIC) based on amino acid composition. Chromaogr. Today, 2015, 39–42 November.
[28] Randazzo, G.M., Tonoli, D., Hambye, S., Guillarme, D., Jeanneret, F., Nurisso, A., Goracci, L., Boccard, J., Rudaz, S., Prediction of retention time in reversed-phase liquid chromatography as a tool for steroid identification. Anal. Chim. Acta 916 (2016), 8–16.
[29] Lusher, S.J., McGuire, R., van Schaik, R.C., Nicholson, C.D., de Vlieg, J., Data-driven medicinal chemistry in the era of big data. Drug Discov. Today 19 (2014), 859–868.
[30] Wilson, N.S., Nelson, M.D., Dolan, J.W., Snyder, L.R., Wolcott, R.G., Carr, P.W., Column selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography I. A general quantitative relationship. J. Chromatogr. A 961 (2002), 171–193.
[31] Park, S.H., Shellie, R.A., Dicinoski, G.W., Schuster, G., Talebi, M., Haddad, P.R., Szucs, R., Dolan, J.W., Pohl, C.A., J. Chromtogr. A 1436 (2016), 59–63.
[32] Wilson, N.S., Dolan, J.W., Snyder, L.R., Carr, P.W., Sander, L.C., Column selectivity in reversed-phase liquid chromatography III. The physic-chemical basis of selectivity. J. Chromatogr. A 961 (2002), 217–236.
[33] hplccolumns.org/database/index.php, University of Minnesota − Boswell Research Group.
[35] Halgren, T.A., Merck molecular force field. I. Basis form, scope, parameterization, and performance of MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem. 17 (1996), 490–519.
[36] Halgren, T.A., Merck molecular force field. II. MMFF94 van der Waals and electrostatic parameters for intermolecular interactions. J. Comput. Chem. 17 (1996), 520–552.
[37] Halgren, T.A., Merck molecular force field. III. Molecular geometries and vibrational frequencies for MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem. 17 (1996), 553–586.
[38] Halgren, T.A., Nachbar, R.B., Merck molecular force field. IV. Conformational energies and geometries for MMFF94. J. Comput. Chem. 17 (1996), 587–615.
[39] Vainio, M.J., Johnson, M.S., Generating conformer ensembles using a multiobjective genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 47 (2007), 2462–2474.
[40] Puranen, J.S., Vainio, M.J., Johnson, M.S., Accurate conformation-dependent molecular electrostatic potentials for high-throughput in silico drug discovery. J. Comput. Chem. 31 (2010), 1722–1732.
[41] Stewart, J.J., Optimization of parameters for semi-empirical methods. VI: more modifications to the NDDO approximations and re-optimization of parameters. J. Mol. Model. 19 (2013), 1–32.
[42] MOPAC (2012), Stewart Computational Chemistry, Colorado Springs: CO, USA, OpenMOPAC.net.
[43] SPARTAN software, Wavefunction Inc., CA, USA.
[44] Todeschini, R., Consonni, V., Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. 2000, Wiley-WCH, Weinheim.
[45] Varmuza, K., Filzmoser, P., Dehmer, M., Multivariate linear QSPR/QSAR models: rigorous evaluation of variable selection for PLS. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 5 (2013), 1–10.
[46] Gramatica, P., Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external. QSAR Comb. Sci. 26 (2007), 694–701.
[47] Tropsha, A., Gramatica, P., Gombar, V.K., The importance of being earnest: validation is the absolute essential for successful application and interpretation of QSPR models. QSAR Comb. Sci. 22 (2003), 69–77.
[48] Novič, M., Haddad, P.R., Analyte-stationary phase interactions in ion-exclusion chromatography. J. Chromatogr. A 1118 (2006), 19–28.