Abstract :
[en] The overall objective of this review is to gain insights into landslide risk reduction measures that are applied
or recommended in tropical landslide-prone countries, and the challenges at play. More specifically, this
review aims to (i) presenting an overview of recent studies on landslides and landslide risk reduction in these
countries, (ii) exploring the factors controlling the publication output on landslides and landslide risk
reduction, (iii) reviewing the various landslide risk reduction measures recommended and implemented, and
(iv) identifying the bottlenecks for the implementation of these strategies. A compilation of recommended
and implemented landslide risk reduction measures in 99 landslide-prone tropical countries was made, based
on an extensive review of scientific literature (382 publications). The documented measures are analysed
Corresponding author:
Jan Maes, Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Celestijnenlaan 200E 03.256, Heverlee B-3001,
Belgium.
Email: maes.jan@kuleuven.be
Progress in Physical Geography
1–31
ª The Author(s) 2017
Reprints and permission:
sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav
DOI: 10.1177/0309133316689344
journals.sagepub.com/home/ppg
using a scheme of risk reduction measures that combines classifications of the Hyogo Framework for Action
and the SafeLand project. Our literature review shows that the factors influencing the number of publications
on landslides and landslide risk reduction per country are (in order of importance) the absolute physical
exposure of people to landslides, the population number and the Human Development Index of a country.
The ratio of publications on landslide risk reduction versus publications on landslides for landslide-prone
tropical countries does not vary much between these countries (average: 0.28). A significant fraction (0.30) of
all known landslide hazard reduction measures are neither implemented nor recommended according to our
review. The most recommended landslide risk reduction component is ‘risk management and vulnerability
reduction’ (0.38). However, the most implemented component is ‘risk assessment’ (0.57). Overall, the ratio
of implemented versus recommended landslide risk reduction measures in the tropics is low (<0.50) for most
landslide risk reduction components, except for ‘risk assessment’ (3.01). The most cited bottlenecks for
implementing landslide risk reduction measures are scientific (0.30) and political (0.29) in nature.
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
35