Request a copy

Full Text

6

CITATIONS

6 Total citations

0 Recent citations

1.89 Field Citation Ratio

n/a Relative Citation Ratio

publications

0

supporting

0

mentioning

0

contrasting

0

Smart Citations

0

0

0

0

Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting

View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

• Afriat S.N. The construction of utility functions from expenditure data. Internat. Econom. Rev. 1967, 8(1):67-77.
• Apesteguia Jose, Ballester Miguel A. The computational complexity of rationalizing behavior. J. Math. Econom. 2010, 46(3):356-363.
• Cherchye L., De Rock B., Platino V. Private versus public consumption within groups: testing the nature of goods from aggregate data. Econom. Theory 2013, 54:1248-1258.
• Cherchye L., De Rock B., Vermeulen F. The collective model of household consumption: a nonparametric characterization. Econometrica 2007, 75(2):553-574.
• Cherchye L., De Rock B., Vermeulen F. Collective Household Consumption Behavior: Revealed Preference Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 2010, vol. 4. Boston and Delft.
• Cherchye L., De Rock B., Vermeulen F. The revealed preference approach to collective consumption behaviour: testing and sharing rule recovery. Rev. Econom. Stud. 2011, 78(1):176-198.
• Cherchye L., De Rock B., Vermeulen F. Collective Household Consumption Behavior: Revealed Preference Analysis. Foundations and Trends in Econometrics 2012, vol. 4. Now.
• Chiappori P.A. Rational household labor supply. Econometrica 1988, 56(1):63-90.
• Deb R. An efficient nonparametric test of the collective household model. Technical Report 2010, University of Toronto. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1107246.
• Demuynck T. The computational complexity of rationalizing boundedly rational choice behavior. J. Math. Econom. 2011, 47(4):425.
• Echenique F., Lee S., Shum M. The money pump as a measure of revealed preference violations. J. Polit. Econ. 2011, 119(6):1201-1223.
• Garey M.R., Johnson D.S. Computers and Intractability. Vol. 174 1979, Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
• Peters H., Wakker P. WARP does not imply SARP for more than two commodities. J. Econom. Theory 1994, 62(1):152-160.
• Piaw, T.C., Vohra, R.V., 2003. Afriat's theorem and negative cycles. Working Paper.
• Samuelson P.A. A note on the pure theory of consumer's behaviour. Economica 1938, 5(17):61-71.
• Smeulders B., Spieksma F.C.R., Cherchye L., De Rock B. Goodness of fit measures for revealed preference tests: complexity results and algorithms. ACM Trans. Econ. Comput. 2014, 2(1). Article 3.
• Talla Nobibon, F., Cherchye, L., Crama, Y., Demuynck, T., De Rock, B., Spieksma, F.C.R., 2012. Algorithms for testing the collective consumption model. Working Paper, KU Leuven, Belgium.
• Talla Nobibon F., Cherchye L., De Rock B., Sabbe J., Spieksma F.C.R. Heuristics for deciding collectively rational consumption behavior. Comput. Econ. 2011, 38(2):173-204.
• Talla Nobibon F., Smeulders B., Spieksma F.C.R. A note on testing axioms of revealed preference. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 2014, 10.1007/s10957-014-0657-9.
• Talla Nobibon F., Spieksma F.C.R. On the complexity of testing the collective axiom of revealed preference. Math. Social Sci. 2010, 60(2):123-136.
• Varian H.R. The nonparametric approach to demand analysis. Econometrica 1982, 50(4):945-973.
• Varian H.R. Revealed preference. Samuelsonian Economics and the Twenty-First Century 2006, 99-116. Oxford University Press. M. Szenberg, L.B. Ramrattan, A.A. Gottesman (Eds.).
• Vermeulen F. Collective household models: principles and main results. J. Econ. Surv. 2002, 16(4):533-564.