Article (Scientific journals)
Nasal heterotopia versus pilocytic astrocytoma: A narrow border.
ELLOUZE, Nesrine; Born, Jacques Daniel; Hoyoux, Claire et al.
2015In Neuro-Chirurgie, 61 (4), p. 279-82
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Ellouze_2015_Nasal heterotopia versus pilocytic astrocytoma - a narrow border.pdf
Author preprint (1.34 MB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
Astrocytoma/diagnosis/surgery; Diagnosis, Differential; Encephalocele/diagnosis/surgery; Glioma/diagnosis/surgery; Humans; Infant; Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods; Male; Nose Neoplasms/diagnosis/surgery; Approche neurochirurgicale; Astrocytome pilocytique; Encephalocele frontonasal; Frontonasal encephalocele; Glial heterotopia; Heterotopie gliale; Imagerie prenatale; Neurosurgical approach; Pilocytic astrocytoma; Prenatal imagery
Abstract :
[en] Failure of the anterior neuropore can lead to three main types of anomalies: nasal dermal sinus, encephalocele and nasal glioma or heterotopia. In this report, we describe a case of intracranial and extracranial glial heterotopia that probably resulted from a common failure of anterior neuropore development. We describe the prenatal radiological assessment based on ultrasound and MRI results, and consider their limitation for early fetal diagnosis. We also discuss the embryogenesis and the possible pathogenic mechanisms involved.
Disciplines :
Neurology
Surgery
Pediatrics
Oncology
Author, co-author :
ELLOUZE, Nesrine ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service de pédiatrie
Born, Jacques Daniel;  Centre Hospitalier Régional de Namur
Hoyoux, Claire 
Michotte, Alex
Retz, C.
Tebache, M.
Piette, Caroline ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Pédiatrie
Language :
English
Title :
Nasal heterotopia versus pilocytic astrocytoma: A narrow border.
Publication date :
2015
Journal title :
Neuro-Chirurgie
ISSN :
0028-3770
Publisher :
Elsevier Masson, Paris, France
Volume :
61
Issue :
4
Pages :
279-82
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Commentary :
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.
Available on ORBi :
since 23 January 2017

Statistics


Number of views
50 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
3 (3 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
2
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
2
OpenCitations
 
3

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi