This website uses cookies

The University of Liège wishes to use cookies or trackers to store and access your personal data, to perform audience measurement. Some cookies are necessary for the website to function. Cookie policy.

Article (Scientific journals)
Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, part II: omics analyses of urine and blood samples
Erpicum, Pauline; HANSSEN, Oriane; WEEKERS, Laurent et al.
2017In NDT Plus, p. 1-10
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
2016 Clin Kidney J Erpicum-ckj-sfw077.pdf
Publisher postprint (522.86 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
acute rejection; biomarkers; gene expression; kidney biopsy; proteomics
Abstract :
[en] Kidney transplantation (KTx) represents the best available treatment for patients with end-stage renal disease. Still, the full benefits of KTx are undermined by acute rejection (AR). The diagnosis of AR ultimately relies on transplant needle biopsy. However, such an invasive procedure is associated with a significant risk of complications and is limited by sampling error and interobserver variability. In the present review, we summarize the current literature about non-invasive approaches for the diagnosis of AR in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), including in vivo imaging, gene-expression profiling and omics analyses of blood and urine samples. Most imaging techniques, such as contrast-enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance, exploit the fact that blood flow is significantly lowered in case of AR-induced inflammation. In addition, AR-associated recruitment of activated leucocytes may be detectable by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography. In parallel, urine biomarkers, including CXCL9/CXCL10 or a three-gene signature of CD3ε, CXCL10 and 18S RNA levels, have been identified. None of these approaches has yet been adopted in the clinical follow-up of KTRs, but standardization of analysis procedures may help assess reproducibility and comparative diagnostic yield in large, prospective, multicentre trials.
Disciplines :
Urology & nephrology
Radiology, nuclear medicine & imaging
Author, co-author :
Erpicum, Pauline ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Néphrologie
HANSSEN, Oriane ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Frais communs médecine - Pool assistants
WEEKERS, Laurent  ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service de néphrologie
LOVINFOSSE, Pierre ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service médical de médecine nucléaire et imagerie onco
Meunier, Paul ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Département des sciences cliniques
TSHIBANDA, Luaba ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service médical de radiodiagnostic
Krzesinski, Jean-Marie ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Néphrologie
Hustinx, Roland  ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Médecine nucléaire
Jouret, François  ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences cliniques > Néphrologie
Language :
English
Title :
Non-invasive approaches in the diagnosis of acute rejection in kidney transplant recipients, part II: omics analyses of urine and blood samples
Publication date :
2017
Journal title :
NDT Plus
ISSN :
1753-0784
eISSN :
1753-0792
Publisher :
Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
Pages :
1-10
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 08 October 2016

Statistics


Number of views
189 (31 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
183 (20 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
30
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
23
OpenCitations
 
10
OpenAlex citations
 
33

publications
36
supporting
1
mentioning
29
contrasting
0
Smart Citations
36
1
29
0
Citing PublicationsSupportingMentioningContrasting
View Citations

See how this article has been cited at scite.ai

scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.

Bibliography


Similar publications



Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
Contact ORBi