Thot Data Model; Ancient Egyptian; Corpus; Data Model; Text Encoding; CIDOC-CRM
Abstract :
[en] In this paper, we propose a conceptual data model that could be the basis for future implementations of databases and digital corpuses of Ancient Egyptian texts that fully integrate the material dimensions of writing. The types of metadata that can be used for documenting the elements and relationships of this model are discussed and the resources (URIs) available for its online implementation (in the perspective of the ‘linked open data’ movement) are examined.
Disciplines :
Classical & oriental studies Computer science
Author, co-author :
Polis, Stéphane ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de l'antiquité > Egyptologie
Razanajao, Vincent ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences de l'antiquité > Egyptologie
Language :
English
Title :
Ancient Egyptian texts in contexts. Towards a conceptual data model (the Thot Data Model - TDM)
C. Haas, Writing technology: Studies on the materiality of literacy (Mahwah 1996) for a discussion of the inextricable link between writing and the material world, as well as the conceptualization of writing as an embodied practice.
Thesaurus Linguae Aegyptiae (http://aaew.bbaw.de/tla/)
Ramses Online http://ramses.ulg.ac.be
Honnay, and J. Winand, ‘Building an annotated corpus of Late Egyptian. The Ramses Project: Review and perspectives’, in Texts, Languages & Information Technology in Egyptology, ed. St. Polis & J. Winand (Liège 2013) 11–23 and 25–44.
B. J. Little, Text-aided archaeology (Boca Raton 1991); for written documents as constitutive of the past rather than evidence about the past
J. Moreland, Archaeology and text (London 2001)
J. Moreland, ‘Archaeology and Texts: Subservience or enlightenment’, Annual Review of Anthropology 35 (2006) 135–151
Emmanuelle Morlock and Eleonora Santin, ‘The inscription between text and object. The deconstruction of a multifaceted notion with a view of a flexible digital representation’, in First EAGLE International Conference on Information Technologies for Epigraphy and Cultural Heritage, Sep 2014, ed. S. Orlandi et al. (Paris 2014) 325–350.
D. Buzzetti, ‘Digital representation and the text model’, New Literary History 33 (2002) 61–88
Namely the TopBib (http://topbib.griffith.ox.ac.uk)
Ramses (http://ramses.ulg.ac.be) projects.
D. Buzzetti, ‘Digital representation and the text model’, 76–81
L. Habachi, The second stela of Kamose and his struggle against the Hyksos ruler and his capital, Abhandlungen des Deutschen Archäologischen Instituts Kairo, Ägyptologische Reihe 8 (Glückstadt 1972).
S. Biston-Moulin, ‘De Sésostris Ier à Kamosis: note sur un remploi de Karnak’, Égypte Nilotique et Méditerranéenne 4 (2011) 81–90 [http://www.enim-egyptologie.fr/index.php?page=enim-4&n=4].
G. Posener, ‘Les ostraca numérotés et le Conte du Revenant’, in Древний Восток. Сборник 1: к семидесятипятилетию академика М. А. Коростовцева, ed. I.S. Katsnel’son (Moscow 1975) 107.
S. Bickel and B. Mathieu, ‘L’écrivain Amennakht et son Enseignement’, Bulletin de l’Institut Français d’Archéologie Orientale 93 (1993) 31–51
A. Dorn, ‘Die Lehre Amunnachts’, Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 131 (2004) 38–55
A. Dorn, ‘Zur Lehre Amunnachts: ein Join und Missing Links’, Zeitschrift für ägyptische Sprache und Altertumskunde 140 (2013) 112–125.
St. Polis, ‘The scribal repertoire of Amennakhte son of Ipuy: Describing variation across Late Egyptian registers’, in Beyond free variation: Scribal repertoires from Old Kingdom to Early Islamic Egypt, ed. J. Cromwell and E. Grossman (Oxford 2016).
E. Relph, Place and Placelessness (London 1976), quoted in P. L. Price, ‘Place’, in The Wiley-Blackwell companion to cultural geography, ed. N. C. Johnson, R. H. Schein, J. Winders (2013) 122.
L. Manniche, Lost tombs: A study of certain Eighteenth Dynasty monuments in the Theban necropolis, Studies in Egyptology (London 1988).
‘Digital Epigraphy and Archaeology’ project for the squeezes of Greek and Latin inscriptions: http://www.digitalepigraphy.org/toolbox/info.html.
The links between the TDM and the FRBRoo ontology (http://www.cidoc-crm.org/frbr_inro.html)
http://www.cidoc-crm.org/
D. Oldman, The CIDOC Conceptual Reference Model (CIDOC-CRM): primer, version 1, July 2014 (http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/CRMPrimer_v1.1.pdf).
Felicetti et al., ‘CIDOC CRM and Epigraphy: a Hermeneutic Challenge,’ at the 34th joined meeting of the CIDOC-CRM SIG, Heraklion, Crete, 6–9 October 2015 available at http://www.cidoc-crm.org/docs/34thmeeting-presentations/CRM_epigraphy.ppt.
http://www.eagle-network.eu; see in particular 3.1.2
M.-A. Sicilia et al., Eagle Metadata Model Specification, version 1.1, [2015] (http://www.eagle-network.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/EAGLE_D3.1_EAGLEmetadata-model-specification_v1.1.pdf).
http://thot.philo.ulg.ac.be/.
The Anneliese Maier Forschungspreis awarded to Jean Winand (https://www.humboldt-foundation.de/web/amp2015.html).
