[en] Antipredator responses are a key determinant of the successful persistence of prey, and behavioural modifications are a frequent antipredator strategy. However, conspecific populations often inhabit heterogeneous environments. This can determine local adaptations, and might also induce variation in antipredator responses. Nevertheless, there is limited information on whether heterogeneity of predation risk among populations determines variation in antipredator response. Here we studied the fire salamander, Salamandra salamandra, a species that can breed in both surface streams and caves, habitats that are predator-rich and predator-free, respectively, and measured differences in antipredator responses across populations with different predation risk. We combined field surveys and laboratory experiments to understand the role of predation risk on the activity patterns of larvae, while measuring behavioural differences between populations. We reared larvae from different habitats in safe and risky conditions and tested their response to predator cues before and after rearing. In the field, predation risk was much higher in surface streams than in caves; larvae moved more in the absence of predators and when the light intensity was low. During laboratory experiments, larvae were less active if reared in risky conditions, but cave larvae showed a stronger response to risk than stream larvae. Therefore, larvae from sites without predators showed higher antipredator responses than those from risky habitats. This response fits the predictions of the risk allocation model, in which prey from habitats with a high background level of risk need to be active even when predators are present, to satisfy their energetic demands. Our findings show that antipredator behaviour may differ strongly between populations and stress the importance of integrating this variability in studies on predatory responses.
Amo, L., Lopez, P., Martin, J., Risk level and thermal costs affect the choice of escape strategy and refuge use in the wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Copeia 2003 (2003), 899–905.
Barnett, H.K., Richardson, J.S., Predation risk and competition effects on the life-history characteristics of larval Oregon spotted frog and larval red-legged frog. Oecologia 132 (2002), 436–444.
Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B.M., Walker, S., lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. R package version 1.0-6. 2014 www.r-project.org.
Blanchet, S., Bernatchez, L., Dodson, J.J., Behavioural and growth responses of a territorial fish (Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, L.) to multiple predatory cues. Ethology 113 (2007), 1061–1072.
Blaustein, L., Non-consumptive effects of larval Salamandra on crustacean prey: Can eggs detect predators?. Oecologia 110 (1997), 212–217.
Breheney, P., Burchett, W., visreg: Visualization of regression models. R package version 2.2-0. 2015 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=visreg.
Carlson, B.E., Langkilde, T., Predation risk in tadpole populations shapes behavioural responses of prey but not strength of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Oikos 123 (2014), 1519–1527.
Caspers, B.A., Junge, C., Weitere, M., Steinfartz, S., Habitat adaptation rather than genetic distance correlates with female preference in fire salamanders (Salamandra salamandra). Frontiers in Zoology, 6, 2009, 13.
Caspers, B.A., Steinfartz, S., Krause, E.T., Larval deposition behaviour and maternal investment of females reflect differential habitat adaptation in a genetically diverging salamander population. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69 (2015), 407–413.
Chao, A., Chang, S.H., An estimating function approach to the inference of catch-effort models. Environmental and Ecological Statistics 6 (1999), 313–334.
Chivers, D.P., Wildy, E.L., Kiesecker, J.M., Blaustein, A.R., Avoidance response of juvenile pacific treefrogs to chemical cues of introduced predatory bullfrogs. Journal of Chemical Ecology 27 (2001), 1667–1676.
Davenport, J.M., Chalcraft, D.R., Nonconsumptive effects in a multiple predator system reduce the foraging efficiency of a keystone predator. Ecology and Evolution 3 (2013), 3063–3072.
Delcourt, J., Denoël, M., Ylieff, M., Poncin, P., Video multitracking of fish behaviour: A review and future perspectives. Fish and Fisheries 14 (2013), 186–204.
Denoël, M., Bichot, M., Ficetola, G.F., Delcourt, J., Ylieff, M., Kestemont, P., et al. Cumulative effects of road de-icing salt on amphibian behavior. Aquatic Toxicology 99 (2010), 275–280.
Dodd, C.K.J., Amphibian ecology and conservation. 2010, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Drake, D.L., Anderson, T.L., Smith, L.M., Lohraff, K.M., Semlitsch, R.D., Predation of eggs and recently hatched larvae of endemic ringed salamanders (Ambystoma annulatum) by native and introduced aquatic predators. Herpetologica 70 (2014), 378–387.
Epp, J., Gabor, C.R., Innate and learned predator recognition mediated by chemical signals in Eurycea nana. Ethology 114 (2008), 607–615.
Ferrari, M.C.O., Short-term environmental variation in predation risk leads to differential performance in predation-related cognitive function. Animal Behaviour 95 (2014), 9–14.
Ferrari, M.C.O., Crane, A.L., Brown, G.E., Chivers, D.P., Getting ready for invasions: Can background level of risk predict the ability of naïve prey to survive invasive predators?. Scientific Reports, 5, 2015, 8309.
Ferrari, M.C.O., Sih, A., Chivers, D.P., The paradox of risk allocation: A review and prospectus. Animal Behaviour 78 (2009), 579–585.
Godsall, B., Coulson, T., Malo, A.F., From physiology to space use: Energy reserves and androgenization explain home-range size variation in a woodland rodent. Journal of Animal Ecology 83 (2014), 126–135.
Hernandez, S.A., Peckarsky, B.L., Do stream mayflies exhibit trade-offs between food acquisition and predator avoidance behaviors?. Freshwater Science 33 (2014), 124–133.
Jusczcyk, W., Zakrzewski, M., External morphology of larval stages of the spotted salamander Salamandra salamandra (L.). Acta Biologica Cracoviensa 23 (1981), 127–135.
Kishida, O., Trussell, G.C., Nishimura, K., Ohgushi, T., Inducible defenses in prey intensify predator cannibalism. Ecology 90 (2009), 3150–3158.
Kishida, O., Trussell, G.C., Ohno, A., Kuwano, S., Ikawa, T., Nishimura, K., Predation risk suppresses the positive feedback between size structure and cannibalism. Journal of Animal Ecology 80 (2011), 1278–1287.
Krause, E.T., Caspers, B.A., The influence of a water current on the larval deposition pattern of females of a diverging fire salamander population (Salamandra salamandra). Salamandra 51 (2015), 156–160.
Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, B., Christensen, H.B., lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 2.0-29. 2015 www.r-project.org.
Laurila, A., Pakkasmaa, S., Merilä, J., Population divergence in growth rate and antipredator defences in Rana arvalis. Oecologia 147 (2006), 585–595.
Lima, S.L., Stress and decision making under the risk of predation: Recent developments from behavioral, reproductive, and ecological perspectives. Advances in the Study of Behavior 27 (1998), 215–290.
Lima, S.L., Bednekoff, P.A., Temporal variation in danger drives antipredator behavior: The predation risk allocation hypothesis. American Naturalist 153 (1999), 649–659.
Limongi, L., Ficetola, G.F., Romeo, G., Manenti, R., Environmental factors determining growth of salamander larvae: A field study. Current Zoology 61 (2015), 421–427.
Manenti, R., Role of cave features for aquatic troglobiont fauna occurrence: Effects on “accidentals” and troglomorphic organisms distribution. Acta Zoologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 60 (2014), 257–270.
Manenti, R., Denoël, M., Ficetola, G.F., Foraging plasticity favours adaptation to new habitats in fire salamanders. Animal Behaviour 86 (2013), 375–382.
Manenti, R., Ficetola, G.F., Salamanders breeding in subterranean habitats: Local adaptations or behavioural plasticity?. Journal of Zoology 289 (2013), 182–188.
Manenti, R., Ficetola, G.F., Bianchi, B., De Bernardi, F., Habitat features and distribution of Salamandra salamandra in underground springs. Acta Herpetologica 4 (2009), 143–151.
Manenti, R., Ficetola, G.F., Marieni, A., De Bernardi, F., Caves as breeding sites for Salamandra salamandra: Habitat selection, larval development and conservation issues. North-Western Journal of Zoology 7 (2011), 304–309.
Manenti, R., Pennati, R., Ficetola, G.F., Role of density and resource competition in determining aggressive behaviour in salamanders. Journal of Zoology 296 (2015), 270–277.
Manenti, R., Siesa, M.E., Ficetola, G.F., Odonata occurrence in caves: Active or accidentals? a new case study. Journal of Cave and Karst Studies 75 (2013), 205–209.
Mathis, A., Ferrari, M.C.O., Windel, N., Messier, F., Chivers, D.P., Learning by embryos and the ghost of predation future. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 275 (2008), 2603–2607.
Nakagawa, S., Schielzeth, H., A general and simple method for obtaining R2 from generalized linear mixed-effects models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 4 (2013), 133–142.
Preisser, E.L., Bolnick, D.I., When predators don't eat their prey: Nonconsumptive predator effects on prey dynamics. Ecology 89 (2008), 2414–2415.
Satterthwaite, F.E., An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components. Biometrics 2 (1946), 110–114.
Stav, G., Blaustein, L., Margalit, Y., Influence of nymphal Anax imperator (Odonata: Aeshnidae) on oviposition by the mosquito Culiseta longiareolata (Diptera: Culicidae) and community structure in temporary pools. Journal of Vector Ecology 25 (2000), 190–202.
Storfer, A., Sih, A., Gene flow and ineffective antipredator behavior in a stream-breeding salamander. Evolution 52 (1998), 558–565.
Uiblein, F., Durand, J.P., Juberthie, C., Parzefall, J., Predation in caves – The effects of prey immobility and darkness on the foraging behavior of two salamanders, Euproctus asper and Proteus anguinus. Behavioural Processes 28 (1992), 33–40.
Uiblein, F., Engelke, S., Parzefall, J., Trade-off between visual detectability and nutrient content in the patch choice of the Pyrenean salamander Euproctus asper. Ethology 101 (1995), 39–45.
Urban, M.C., Risky prey behavior evolves in risky habitats. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104 (2007), 14377–14382.
Winandy, L., Darnet, E., Denoël, M., Amphibians forgo aquatic life in response to alien fish introduction. Animal Behaviour 109 (2015), 209–216.
Winandy, L., Denoël, M., Cues from introduced fish alter shelter use and feeding behaviour in adult alpine newts. Ethology 119 (2013), 121–129.
Winandy, L., Denoël, M., Introduced goldfish affect amphibians through inhibition of sexual behaviour in risky habitats: An experimental approach. PLoS One, 8, 2013, e82736.
Winandy, L., Denoël, M., Expression of sexual ornaments in a polymorphic species: Phenotypic variation in response to environmental risk. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28 (2015), 1049–1056.
Yorzinski, J.L., Chisholm, S., Byerley, S.D., Coy, J.R., Aziz, A., Wolf, J.A., et al. Artificial light pollution increases nocturnal vigilance in peahens. Peerj, 3, 2015, e1174.