1 Kolh, P., Windecker, S., Alfonso, F., Collet, J.P., Cremer, J., Falk, V., et al. 2014 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the task force on myocardial revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 46 (2014), 517–592.
2 Hillis, L.D., Smith, P.K., Anderson, J.L., Bittl, J.A., Bridges, C.R., Byrne, J.G., et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. A report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Developed in collaboration with the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 58 (2011), e123–e210.
3 Fihn, S.D., Gardin, J.M., Abrams, J., Berra, K., Blankenship, J.C., Dallas, A.P., et al. 2012 ACCF/AHA/ACP/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American College of Physicians, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Am Coll Cardiol 60 (2012), e44–e164.
4 Fihn, S.D., Blankenship, J.C., Alexander, K.P., Bittl, J.A., Byrne, J.G., Fletcher, B.J., et al. 2014 ACC/AHA/AATS/PCNA/SCAI/STS focused update of the guideline for the diagnosis and management of patients with stable ischemic heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines, and the American Association for Thoracic Surgery, Preventive Cardiovascular Nurses Association, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 149 (2015), e5–23.
5 Aldea, G.S., Bakaeen, F.G., Pal, J., Fremes, S., Head, S.J., Sabik, J., et al. The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines on Arterial Conduits for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 101 (2016), 801–809.
6 Feit, F., Brooks, M.M., Sopko, G., Keller, N.M., Rosen, A., Krone, R., et al. Long-term clinical outcome in the Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation Registry: comparison with the randomized trial. BARI Investigators. Circulation 101 (2000), 2795–2802.
7 King, S.B. III, Barnhart, H.X., Kosinski, A.S., Weintraub, W.S., Lembo, N.J., Petersen, J.Y., et al. Angioplasty or surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: comparison of eligible registry and randomized patients in the EAST trial and influence of treatment selection on outcomes. Emory Angioplasty versus Surgery Trial Investigators. Am J Cardiol 79 (1997), 1453–1459.
8 Bonzel, T., Schachinger, V., Dorge, H., Description of a Heart Team approach to coronary revascularization and its beneficial long-term effect on clinical events after PCI. Clin Res Cardiol, 2015 [Epub ahead of print].
9 Yates, M.T., Soppa, G.K., Valencia, O., Jones, S., Firoozi, S., Jahangiri, M., Impact of European Society of Cardiology and European Association for Cardiothoracic Surgery Guidelines on myocardial revascularization on the activity of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery for stable coronary artery disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147 (2014), 606–610.
10 Long, J., Luckraz, H., Thekkudan, J., Maher, A., Norell, M., Heart team discussion in managing patients with coronary artery disease: outcome and reproducibility. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 14 (2012), 594–598.
11 O'Gara, P.T., Kushner, F.G., Ascheim, D.D., Casey, D.E. Jr, Chung, M.K., de Lemos, J.A., et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 127 (2013), e362–e425.
12 Amsterdam, E.A., Wenger, N.K., Brindis, R.G., Casey, D.E. Jr, Ganiats, T.G., Holmes, D.R. Jr., et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with non-st-elevation acute coronary syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 64 (2014), e139–e228.
13 Hamm, C.W., Bassand, J.P., Agewall, S., Bax, J., Boersma, E., Bueno, H., et al. ESC guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: the task force for the management of acute coronary syndromes (ACS) in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Eur Heart J 32 (2011), 2999–3054.
14 Southern, D.A., Izadnegahdar, M., Humphries, K.H., Gao, M., Wang, F., Knudtson, M.L., et al. Trends in wait times for cardiac revascularization. Can J Cardiol 27 (2011), 262–267.
15 Sianos, G., Morel, M.A., Kappetein, A.P., Morice, M.C., Colombo, A., Dawkins, K., et al. The SYNTAX score: an angiographic tool grading the complexity of coronary artery disease. EuroIntervention 1 (2005), 219–227.
16 Mohr, F.W., Morice, M.C., Kappetein, A.P., Feldman, T.E., Stahle, E., Colombo, A., et al. Coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with three-vessel disease and left main coronary disease: 5-year follow-up of the randomised, clinical SYNTAX trial. Lancet 381 (2013), 629–638.
17 Montalescot, G., Sechtem, U., Achenbach, S., Andreotti, F., Arden, C., Budaj, A., et al. 2013 ESC guidelines on the management of stable coronary artery disease: the task force on the management of stable coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J 34 (2013), 2949–3003.
18 Yi, G., Shine, B., Rehman, S.M., Altman, D.G., Taggart, D.P., Effect of bilateral internal mammary artery grafts on long-term survival: a meta-analysis approach. Circulation 130 (2014), 539–545.
19 Takagi, H., Goto, S.N., Watanabe, T., Mizuno, Y., Kawai, N., Umemoto, T., A meta-analysis of adjusted hazard ratios from 20 observational studies of bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery coronary artery bypass grafting. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 (2014), 1282–1290.
20 Taggart, D.P., Altman, D.G., Gray, A.M., Lees, B., Nugara, F., Yu, L.M., et al. Randomized trial to compare bilateral vs. single internal mammary coronary artery bypass grafting: 1-year results of the Arterial Revascularisation Trial (ART). Eur Heart J 31 (2010), 2470–2481.
21 Miwa, S., Desai, N., Koyama, T., Chan, E., Cohen, E.A., Fremes, S.E., Radial artery angiographic string sign: clinical consequences and the role of pharmacologic therapy. Ann Thorac Surg 81 (2006), 112–118.
22 Desai, N.D., Naylor, C.D., Kiss, A., Cohen, E.A., Feder-Elituv, R., Miwa, S., et al. Impact of patient and target-vessel characteristics on arterial and venous bypass graft patency: insight from a randomized trial. Circulation 115 (2007), 684–691.
23 Tatoulis, J., Buxton, B.F., Fuller, J.A., The right internal thoracic artery: the forgotten conduit—5,766 patients and 991 angiograms. Ann Thorac Surg 92 (2011), 9–15.
24 Deb, S., Cohen, E.A., Singh, S.K., Une, D., Laupacis, A., Fremes, S.E., Radial artery and saphenous vein patency more than 5 years after coronary artery bypass surgery: results from RAPS (Radial Artery Patency Study). J Am Coll Cardiol 60 (2012), 28–35.
25 Achouh, P., Isselmou, K.O., Boutekadjirt, R., D'Alessandro, C., Pagny, J.Y., Fouquet, R., et al. Reappraisal of a 20-year experience with the radial artery as a conduit for coronary bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 41 (2012), 87–92.
26 Tranbaugh, R.F., Dimitrova, K.R., Friedmann, P., Geller, C.M., Harris, L.J., Stelzer, P., et al. Coronary artery bypass grafting using the radial artery: clinical outcomes, patency, and need for reintervention. Circulation 126 (2012), S170–S175.
27 De Bruyne, B., Fearon, W.F., Pijls, N.H., Barbato, E., Tonino, P., Piroth, Z., et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI for stable coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 371 (2014), 1208–1217.
28 De Bruyne, B., Pijls, N.H., Kalesan, B., Barbato, E., Tonino, P.A., Piroth, Z., et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med 367 (2012), 991–1001.
29 Pijls, N.H., Fearon, W.F., Tonino, P.A., Siebert, U., Ikeno, F., Bornschein, B., et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: 2-year follow-up of the FAME (Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Angiography for Multivessel Evaluation) study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56 (2010), 177–184.
30 Tonino, P.A., De Bruyne, B., Pijls, N.H., Siebert, U., Ikeno, F., Veer, M., et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention. N Engl J Med 360 (2009), 213–224.
31 Nascimento, B.R., Belfort, A.F., Macedo, F.A., Sant'Anna, F.M., Pereira, G.T., Costa, M.A., et al. Meta-analysis of deferral versus performance of coronary intervention based on coronary pressure-derived fractional flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 115 (2015), 385–391.
32 Zhang, D., Lv, S., Song, X., Yuan, F., Xu, F., Zhang, M., et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: a meta-analysis. Heart 101 (2015), 455–462.
33 Toth, G., De Bruyne, B., Casselman, F., De Vroey, F., Pyxaras, S., Di Serafino, L., et al. Fractional flow reserve-guided versus angiography-guided coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Circulation 128 (2013), 1405–1411.
34 Botman, C.J., Schonberger, J., Koolen, S., Penn, O., Botman, H., Dib, N., et al. Does stenosis severity of native vessels influence bypass graft patency? A prospective fractional flow reserve-guided study. Ann Thorac Surg 83 (2007), 2093–2097.
35 Tatoulis, J., Total arterial coronary revascularization-patient selection, stenoses, conduits, targets. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2 (2013), 499–506.
36 Zacharias, A., Schwann, T.A., Riordan, C.J., Durham, S.J., Shah, A.S., Engoren, M., et al. Late outcomes after radial artery versus saphenous vein grafting during reoperative coronary artery bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139 (2010), 1511–1518.
37 Muneretto, C., Bisleri, G., Negri, A., Manfredi, J., Metra, M., Nodari, S., et al. Total arterial myocardial revascularization with composite grafts improves results of coronary surgery in elderly: a prospective randomized comparison with conventional coronary artery bypass surgery. Circulation 108:Suppl 1 (2003), II29–II33.
38 Buxton, B.F., Shi, W.Y., Tatoulis, J., Fuller, J.A., Rosalion, A., Hayward, P.A., Total arterial revascularization with internal thoracic and radial artery grafts in triple-vessel coronary artery disease is associated with improved survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 (2014), 1238–1243.
39 Shi, W.Y., Hayward, P.A., Tatoulis, J., Rosalion, A., Newcomb, A.E., Fuller, J.A., et al. Are all forms of total arterial revascularization equal? A comparison of single versus bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting strategies. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 150 (2015), 1526–1534.
40 Kamiya, H., Ushijima, T., Kanamori, T., Ikeda, C., Nakagaki, C., Ueyama, K., et al. Use of the radial artery graft after transradial catheterization: is it suitable as a bypass conduit?. Ann Thorac Surg 76 (2003), 1505–1509.
41 Grau, J.B., Kuschner, C.E., Johnson, C.K., Ferrari, G., Zapolanski, A., Brizzio, M.E., et al. The effects of using a radial artery in patients already receiving bilateral internal mammary arteries during coronary bypass grafting: 30-day outcomes and 14-year survival in a propensity-matched cohort. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 49 (2016), 203–210.
42 Glineur, D., Importance of the third arterial graft in multiple arterial grafting strategies. Ann Cardiothorac Surg 2 (2013), 475–480.
43 Guru, V., Fremes, S.E., Tu, J.V., How many arterial grafts are enough? A population-based study of midterm outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 (2006), 1021–1028.
44 Nathoe, H.M., van Dijk, D., Jansen, E.W., Suyker, W.J., Diephuis, J.C., van Boven, W.J., et al. A comparison of on-pump and off-pump coronary bypass surgery in low-risk patients. N Engl J Med 348 (2003), 394–402.
45 Khan, N.E., De Souza, A., Mister, R., Flather, M., Clague, J., Davies, S., et al. A randomized comparison of off-pump and on-pump multivessel coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 350 (2004), 21–28.
46 Shroyer, A.L., Grover, F.L., Hattler, B., Collins, J.F., McDonald, G.O., Kozora, E., et al. On-pump versus off-pump coronary-artery bypass surgery. N Engl J Med 361 (2009), 1827–1837.
47 Puskas, J.D., Thourani, V.H., Kilgo, P., Cooper, W., Vassiliades, T., Vega, J.D., et al. Off-pump coronary artery bypass disproportionately benefits high-risk patients. Ann Thorac Surg 88 (2009), 1142–1147.
48 Moller, C.H., Perko, M.J., Lund, J.T., Andersen, L.W., Kelbaek, H., Madsen, J.K., et al. No major differences in 30-day outcomes in high-risk patients randomized to off-pump versus on-pump coronary bypass surgery: the best bypass surgery trial. Circulation 121 (2010), 498–504.
49 Hannan, E.L., Wu, C., Smith, C.R., Higgins, R.S., Carlson, R.E., Culliford, A.T., et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery: differences in short-term outcomes and in long-term mortality and need for subsequent revascularization. Circulation 116 (2007), 1145–1152.
50 Lamy, A., Devereaux, P.J., Prabhakaran, D., Taggart, D.P., Hu, S., Paolasso, E., et al. Effects of off-pump and on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting at 1 year. N Engl J Med 368 (2013), 1179–1188.
51 Diegeler, A., Borgermann, J., Kappert, U., Breuer, M., Boning, A., Ursulescu, A., et al. Off-pump versus on-pump coronary-artery bypass grafting in elderly patients. N Engl J Med 368 (2013), 1189–1198.
52 Sedrakyan, A., Wu, A.W., Parashar, A., Bass, E.B., Treasure, T., Off-pump surgery is associated with reduced occurrence of stroke and other morbidity as compared with traditional coronary artery bypass grafting: a meta-analysis of systematically reviewed trials. Stroke 37 (2006), 2759–2769.
53 Zhang, B., Zhou, J., Li, H., Liu, Z., Chen, A., Zhao, Q., Comparison of graft patency between off-pump and on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: an updated meta-analysis. Ann Thorac Surg 97 (2014), 1335–1341.
56 Harskamp, R.E., Bonatti, J.O., Zhao, D.X., Puskas, J.D., de Winter, R.J., Alexander, J.H., et al. Standardizing definitions for hybrid coronary revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147 (2014), 556–560.
57 Harskamp, R.E., Brennan, J.M., Xian, Y., Halkos, M.E., Puskas, J.D., Thourani, V.H., et al. Practice patterns and clinical outcomes after hybrid coronary revascularization in the United States: an analysis from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons adult cardiac database. Circulation 130 (2014), 872–879.
58 Panoulas, V.F., Colombo, A., Margonato, A., Maisano, F., Hybrid coronary revascularization: promising, but yet to take off. J Am Coll Cardiol 65 (2015), 85–97.
59 Singh, S.K., Desai, N.D., Petroff, S.D., Deb, S., Cohen, E.A., Radhakrishnan, S., et al. The impact of diabetic status on coronary artery bypass graft patency: insights from the radial artery patency study. Circulation 118 (2008), S222–S225.
60 Deb, S., Singh, S.K., Moussa, F., Tsubota, H., Une, D., Kiss, A., et al. The long-term impact of diabetes on graft patency after coronary artery bypass grafting surgery: a substudy of the multicenter Radial Artery Patency Study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148 (2014), 1246–1253.
61 Hoffman, D.M., Dimitrova, K.R., DeCastro, H., Friedmann, P., Geller, C.M., Ko, W., et al. Improving long term outcome for diabetic patients undergoing surgical revascularization by use of the radial artery conduit: a propensity matched study. J Cardiothorac Surg, 8, 2013, 27.
62 Schwann, T.A., Al-Shaar, L., Engoren, M., Habib, R.H., Late effects of radial artery vs saphenous vein grafting for multivessel coronary bypass surgery in diabetics: a propensity-matched analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 44 (2013), 701–710.
63 OECD. Health at a Glance 2015: OECD Indicators. 2015, OECD Publishing, Paris.
64 Deutscher Herzbericht 2014, DGK, DGTHG, DGPK, Deutsche Herzstiftung e.V. Publishing; Frankfurt am Main. In: 2016.
65 Beckmann, A., Funkat, A.K., Lewandowski, J., Frie, M., Ernst, M., Hekmat, K., et al. Cardiac Surgery in Germany during 2014: a report on behalf of the German Society for Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 63 (2015), 258–269.
66 Patel, M.R., Dehmer, G.J., Hirshfeld, J.W., Smith, P.K., Spertus, J.A., ACCF/SCAI/STS/AATS/AHA/ASNC 2009 Appropriateness Criteria for Coronary Revascularization: a report by the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriateness Criteria Task Force, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Society of Thoracic Surgeons, American Association for Thoracic Surgery, American Heart Association, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Endorsed by the American Society of Echocardiography, the Heart Failure Society of America, and the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 53 (2009), 530–553.
67 Kim, L.K., Feldman, D.N., Swaminathan, R.V., Minutello, R.M., Chanin, J., Yang, D.C., et al. Rate of percutaneous coronary intervention for the management of acute coronary syndromes and stable coronary artery disease in the United States (2007 to 2011). Am J Cardiol 114 (2014), 1003–1010.
68 Desai, N.R., Bradley, S.M., Parzynski, C.S., Nallamothu, B.K., Chan, P.S., Spertus, J.A., et al. Appropriate Use Criteria for coronary revascularization and trends in utilization, patient selection, and appropriateness of percutaneous coronary intervention. JAMA 314 (2015), 2045–2053.