[en] Purpose: The present study aimed to investigate the safety and the anti-postoperative peritoneal
adhesion (PPA) characteristics of SeprameshVR (Davol), a composite mesh made of polypropylene
covered with Seprafilm, when intraperitoneally placed in a rat model.
Methods: Twenty male rats were randomized into a control group and a Sepramesh group.
They underwent a primary surgical procedure aiming to induce a peritoneal injury in order to
induce PPAs. In the Sepramesh group, the burnt peritoneum was covered with a 2-cm diameter
disc of Sepramesh prosthesis. The mesh was fixed to the parietal peritoneum with four
3-0 absorbable stitches. PPAs were assessed during a second laparotomy 10 days later using
quantitative and qualitative scoring systems.
Results: There was no difference in terms of mean number of PPAs between both groups. All
the rats from the control group developed PPAs. In the Sepramesh group, no adhesions were
observed at the site of the injured peritoneum that had been covered with the Sepramesh
prosthesis, but PPAs occurred at the extremities of the mesh, where there was close contact
between polypropylene and viscera, or where the fixation sutures were placed. The severity
and the type of adhesions were significantly higher in the control group.
Conclusions: This study demonstrated that for the Sepramesh prostheses, the Seprafilm layer
might be effective in PPA prevention, but damage caused by the section and fixation of
Sepramesh should be limited in order to limit PPAs.
Research center :
aCentre De Recherche Et D eveloppement En Chirurgie (CREDEC), GIGA – Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Liege (ULiège), Liege, Belgium; bDepartment of General Surgery, Cliniques Universitaires De Lubumbashi, University of Lubumbashi, Lubumbashi, Katanga Province, Democratic Republic of Congo; cAnimal Facility, GIGA-R Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Liege (ULiège), Liege, Belgium; dDepartment of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, CHU Liege, University of Liege (ULiège CHU), Liege, Belgium
Disciplines :
Surgery
Author, co-author :
Arung, Willy
Drion, Pierre ; Université de Liège > Département des sciences biomédicales et précliniques > GIGA-R:Méth. expér.des anim. de labo et éth. en expér. anim.
DETRY, Olivier ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Chirurgie abdo, sénologique, endocrine et de transplantation
Language :
English
Title :
Sepramesh and postoperative peritoneal adhesions in a rat model
This study was supported in part by institutional research grants from the University of Liege. Pr Willy Arung was a PhD student supported by the CTB (Cooperation Technique Belge, the Belgian Development Agency).
Arung W, Meurisse M, Detry O. Pathophysiology and prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions. Wld J Gastroenterol. 2011;17:4545-4553.
Arung WK, Tshilombo FK, Mukeng CK, et al. Intestinal obstructions complicating peritoneal adhesions at the Lubumbashi University Clinics. Acta Chirurg Belg. 2012;112:195-199.
Arung W, Jehaes F, Cheramy JP, et al. Effects of parecoxib on the prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions in rats. J Invest Surg. 2013;26:340-346.
Schnuriger B, Barmparas G, Branco BC, et al. Prevention of postoperative peritoneal adhesions: a review of the literature. Am J Surg. 2011;201:111-121.
Robb WB, Mariette C. Strategies in the prevention of the formation of postoperative adhesions in digestive surgery: a systematic review of the literature. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014;57:1228-1240.
Belluco C, Meggiolaro F, Pressato D, et al. Prevention of postsurgical adhesions with an autocrosslinked hyaluronan derivative gel. J Surg Res. 2001;100:217-221.
Ersoy E, Ozturk V, Yazgan A, et al. Comparison of the two types of bioresorbable barriers to prevent intra- abdominal adhesions in rats. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13:282-286.
Becker JM, Dayton MT, Fazio VW, et al. Prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions by a sodium hyaluronate-based bioresorbable membrane: a prospective, randomized, double-blind multicenter study. J Am Coll Surg. 1996;183:297-306.
Matthews BD, Mostafa G, Carbonell AM, et al. Evaluation of adhesion formation and host tissue response to intra-abdominal polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and composite prosthetic mesh. J Surg Res. 2005;123:227-234.
Rodriguez M, Pascual G, Sotomayor S, et al. Chemical adhesion barriers: do they affect the intraperitoneal behavior of a composite mesh? J Invest Surg. 2011;24:115-122.
Boland GM, Weigel RJ. Formation and prevention of postoperative abdominal adhesions. J Surg Res. 2006;132:3-12.
Lim R, Stucchi AF, Morrill JM, et al. The efficacy of a hyaluronate-carboxymethylcellulose bioresorbable membrane that reduces postoperative adhesions is increased by the intra-operative co-administration of a neurokinin 1 receptor antagonist in a rat model. Surgery. 2010;148:991-999.
Greca FH, de Paula JB, Biondo-Simoes ML, et al. The influence of differing pore sizes on the biocompatibility of two polypropylene meshes in the repair of abdominal defects. Experimental study in dogs. Hernia. 2001;5:59-64.
Arnaud JP, Eloy R, Adloff M, et al. Critical evaluation of prosthetic materials in repair of abdominal wall hernias: new criteria of tolerance and resistance. Am J Surg. 1977;133:338-345.
White RA. The effect of porosity and biomaterial on the healing and long-term mechanical properties of vascular prostheses. ASAIO Trans/Am Soc Artif Intern Org. 1988;34:95-100.
Leber GE, Garb JL, Alexander AI, et al. Long-term complications associated with prosthetic repair of incisional hernias. Arch Surg. 1998;133:378-382.
Arung W, Drion P, Cheramy JP, et al. Intraperitoneal adhesions after open or laparoscopic abdominal procedure: an experimental study in the rat. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2012;22:651-657.
Matthews BD, Pratt BL, Pollinger HS, et al. Assessment of adhesion formation to intra-abdominal polypropylene mesh and polytetrafluoroethylene mesh. J Surg Res. 2003;114:126-132.
Holtz G. Prevention and management of peritoneal adhesions. Fertil Steril. 1984;41:497-507.
Menzies D, Ellis H. Intestinal obstruction from adhesions- how big is the problem? Ann Roy Coll Surg Engl. 1990;72:60-63.
Liakakos T, Thomakos N, Fine PM, et al. Peritoneal adhesions: etiology, pathophysiology, and clinical significance. Recent advances in prevention and management. Digest Surg. 2001;18:260-273.
Risberg B. Adhesions: preventive strategies. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;577:32-39.
Holmdahl L, Risberg B, Beck DE, et al. Adhesions: pathogenesis and prevention-panel discussion and summary. Eur J Surg Suppl. 1997;577:56-62.
