antibiotic; antimicrobial susceptibility testing; automated susceptibility testing; challenge panel; EUCAST; MIC Breakpoints; Zone diameter breakpoints
Abstract :
[en] A challenge panel of bacterial strains useful for clinical laboratories to validate their European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) antimicrobial susceptibility test (AST) system was established. A total of 117 strains, obtained from Belgian Reference Centers (n=57) and from routine clinical samples (n=60) was selected based on resistance pattern. These strains were analyzed in 7 different laboratories by 3 different automated AST systems (Vitek (n=2), Phoenix (n=2) and Microscan (n=2)) and by disk diffusion from 5 different manufacturers (Rosco (n=2), Becton-Dickinson (n=2), Biomérieux (n=1), Bio-rad (n=1) and i2a (n=1)). To select the challenge panel, selection criteria were set for categorical agreement (CA) between the different systems and the number of very major errors (VME), major errors (ME) and minor errors (MI). VMEs or MEs for at least 2 antibiotics were observed in 43% of all strains, leading to the exclusion of these strains to be selected in the panel. In only 10% of all tested strains there was a 100% CA for all antibiotics. Finally, 28 strains (14 Gram-positive and 14 Gram-negative) covering a wide spectrum of resistance mechanisms were selected. Pilot-testing of this challenge panel in 20 laboratories mainly confirmed the results of the validation study. Only 6 strains withheld for the pilot-study could not be used as challenge strain due to an overall (very) major error rate of more than 5% for a particular antibiotic (n=5) or for two antibiotics (n=1). To conclude, this challenge panel should facilitate the implementation and use of EUCAST breakpoints in laboratories.
Disciplines :
Laboratory medicine & medical technology
Author, co-author :
Desmet, Stefanie; UZ Leuven > Laboratory medicine > Microbiology
Verhagen, Jan; UZ Leuven > Laboratory medicine > microbiology
Glupczynski, Youri; CHU Mont-Godinne Université catholique de Louvain > Clinical Microbiology > Belgian Reference Laboratory of multi-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and multi-resistent Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter
Van Eldere, Johan; UZ Leuven > Laboratory medicine > microbiology
MELIN, Pierrette ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Service de microbiologie clinique > Belgian Reference Laboratory of Group B streptococci
Goossens, Herman; UZ Antwerpen > Microbiology > Belgian Reference Laboratory of Enterococcus spp, Streptococcus pyogenes and other beta-hemolytic streptococci non-group B
Pierard, Denis; UZ Brussels > Laboratory medicine > Medical Microbiology
Declercq, Philippe
Lagrou, Katrien; UZ Leuven > Laboratory medicine > microbiology
Boel, Ann
Cartuyvels, Reinoud
Denis, Olivier; ULB Erasme > Clinical Microbiology > Belgian Reference Laboratory of Staphylococcus aureus
Vandewal, Wouter
Saegeman, Veroniek; UZ Leuven > Laboratory medicine > microbiology
[1] Mouton, J., Brown, D.F., Apfalter, P., Canton, R., Giske, C.G., Ivanova, M., et al. The role of pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics in setting clinical MIC breakpoints: the EUCAST approach. Clin Microbiol Infect 18 (2012), E37–E45.
[2] Kahlmeter, G., Brown, D.F., Goldstein, F.W., MacGowan, A.P., Mouton, J.W., Osterlund, A., et al. European harmonization of MIC breakpoints for antimicrobial susceptibility testing of bacteria. J Antimicrob Chemother 52 (2003), 145–148.
[3] Kahlmeter, G., Brown, D.F., Goldstein, F.W. MacGowan, A.P., Mouton, J.W., Odenholt, I., et al. European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) technical notes on antimicrobial susceptibility testing. Clin Microbiol Infect 12 (2006), 501–503.
[4] Kahlmeter, G., The 2014 Garrod Lecture: EUCAST—are we heading towards international agreement?. J Antimicrob Chemother 70 (2015), 2427–2439.
[5] Brown, D., Cantón, R., Dubreuil, L., Gatermann, S., Giske, C., MacGowan, A., et al. Widespread implementation of EUCAST breakpoints for antibacterial susceptibility testing in Europe. Euro Surveill, 20, 2015, pii=21008.
[6] The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Breakpoint tables for interpretation of MICs and zone diameters. Version 5.0, 2015. [accessed 12.04.15] Available from: http://www.eucast.org/fileadmin/src/media/PDFs/EUCAST_files/Breakpoint_tables/Breakpoint_table_v_4.0.pdf.
[7] CLSI, Verification of Microbial Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Systems; Draft Guideline. CLSI document M52 (Proposed Draft), 2014, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA.
[9] Clark, R., Lewinski, M., et al. Cumitech 31A, Verification and validation of procedures in the clinical microbiology laboratory. 2009, ASM Press, Washington.
[10] Rhodes, N.J., Richardson, C.L., Heraty, R., Liu, J., Malczynski, M., Qi, C., et al. Unacceptably high error rates in Vitek 2 testing of cefepime susceptibility in extended-spectrum-β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58 (2014), 3757–3761.
[11] Jang, W., Park, Y.J., Park, K.G., Yu, J., Evaluation of MicroScan WalkAway and Vitek 2 for determination of the susceptibility of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates to cefepime, cefotaxime and ceftazidime. J Antimicrob Chemother 68 (2013), 2282–2285.