[en] Many experiments have shown that local biodiversity loss impairs the ability of ecosystems to maintain multiple ecosystem functions at high levels (multifunctionality). In contrast, the role of biodiversity in driving ecosystem multifunctionality at landscape scales remains unresolved. We used a comprehensive pan-European dataset, including 16 ecosystem functions measured in 209 forest plots across six European countries, and performed simulations to investigate how local plot-scale richness of tree species (α-diversity) and their turnover between plots (β-diversity) are related to landscape-scale multifunctionality. After accounting for variation in environmental conditions, we found that relationships between α-diversity and landscape-scale multifunctionality varied from positive to negative depending on the multifunctionality metric used. In contrast, when significant, relationships between β-diversity and landscape-scale multifunctionality were always positive, because a high spatial turnover in species composition was closely related to a high spatial turnover in functions that were supported at high levels. Our findings have major implications for forest management and indicate that biotic homogenization can have previously unrecognized and negative consequences for large-scale ecosystem multifunctionality.
Isbell F, et al. (2011) High plant diversity is needed to maintain ecosystem services. Nature 477(477):199-202.
Lefcheck JS, et al. (2015) Biodiversity enhances ecosystem multifunctionality across trophic levels and habitats. Nat Commun 6:6936.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis (Island Press, Washington, DC).
Gamfeldt L, Hillebrand H, Jonsson PR (2008) Multiple functions increase the importance of biodiversity for overall ecosystem functioning. Ecology 89(89):1223-1231.
Green RE, Cornell SJ, Scharlemann JPW, Balmford A (2005) Farming and the fate of wild nature. Science 307(307):550-555.
Goldstein JH, et al. (2012) Integrating ecosystem-service tradeoffs into land-use decisions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109(109):7565-7570.
Manning P, Taylor G, Hanley ME (2015) Bioenergy, food production and biodiversity - an unlikely alliance? Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 7(7):570-576.
Maestre FT, et al. (2012) Plant species richness and ecosystem multifunctionality in global drylands. Science 335(335):214-218.
Gamfeldt L, et al. (2013) Higher levels of multiple ecosystem services are found in forests with more tree species. Nat Commun 4:1340.
Allan E, et al. (2015) Land use intensification alters ecosystem multifunctionality via loss of biodiversity and changes to functional composition. Ecol Lett 18(18):834-843.
Pasari JR, Levi T, Zavaleta ES, Tilman D (2013) Several scales of biodiversity affect ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(110):10219-10222.
McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: A few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14(14):450-453.
Dornelas M, et al. (2014) Assemblage time series reveal biodiversity change but not systematic loss. Science 344(344):296-299.
Vellend M, et al. (2013) Global meta-analysis reveals no net change in local-scale plant biodiversity over time. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110(110):19456-19459.
McGill BJ, Dornelas M, Gotelli NJ, Magurran AE (2015) Fifteen forms of biodiversity trend in the Anthropocene. Trends Ecol Evol 30(30):104-113.
Murphy GEP, Romanuk TN (2014) A meta-analysis of declines in local species richness from human disturbances. Ecol Evol 4(4):91-103.
Newbold T, et al. (2015) Global effects of land use on local terrestrial biodiversity. Nature 520(520):45-50.
Byrnes JEK, et al. (2014) Investigating the relationship between biodiversity and ecosystem multifunctionality: Challenges and solutions. Methods Ecol Evol 5(5):111-124.
Bradford MA, et al. (2014) Discontinuity in the responses of ecosystem processes and multifunctionality to altered soil community composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(111):14478-14483.
Byrnes J, et al. (2014) Multifunctionality does not imply that all functions are positively correlated. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(111):E5490.
Bradford MA, et al. (2014) Reply to Byrnes et al.: Aggregation can obscure understanding of ecosystem multifunctionality. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111(111):E5491. (lett).
Lavorel S, et al. (2011) Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. J Ecol 99(99):135-147.
Grigulis K, et al. (2013) Relative contributions of plant traits and soil microbial properties to mountain grassland ecosystem services. J Ecol 101(101):47-57.
Brandt J (2003) Multifunctional landscapes-perspectives for the future. J Environ Sci (China) 15(15):187-192.
Trumper K, et al. (2009) The Natural Fix? The Role of Ecosystems in Climate Mitigation. A UNEP Rapid Response Assessment. United Nations Environment Programme (United Nations Environment Programme-World Conservation Monitoring Centre, Cambridge, UK).
Loreau M, Mouquet N, Gonzalez A (2003) Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100(100):12765-12770.
Cardinale BJ, Ives AR, Inchausti P (2004) Effects of species diversity on the primary productivity of ecosystems: Extending our spatial and temporal scales of inference. Oikos 104(104):437-450.
Aerts R, Honnay O (2011) Forest restoration, biodiversity and ecosystem functioning. BMC Ecol 11:29.
Fares S, Mugnozza GS, Corona P, Palahí M (2015) Sustainability: Five steps for managing Europe's forests. Nature 519(519):407-409.
Bauhus J, van der Meer P, Kanninen M (2010) Ecosystem Goods and Services from Plantation Forests (Earthscan, London).
Baeten L, et al. (2013) A novel comparative research platform designed to determine the functional significance of tree species diversity in European forests. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 15(15):281-291.
Tilman D, Lehman CL, Bristow CE (1998) Diversity-stability relationships: Statistical inevitability or ecological consequence? Am Nat 151(151):277-282.
Loreau M, Hector A (2001) Partitioning selection and complementarity in biodiversity experiments. Nature 412(412):72-76.
Loreau M (1998) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: A mechanistic model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95(95):5632-5636.
Phalan B, Onial M, Balmford A, Green RE (2011) Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: Land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333(333):1289-1291.
Tscharntke T, Klein AM, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Thies C (2005) Landscape perspectives on agricultural intensification and biodiversity-ecosystem service management. Ecol Lett 8(8):857-874.
Pielou EC (1966) The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. J Theor Biol 13:131-144.
Jucker T, Bouriaud O, Avacaritei D, Coomes DA (2014) Stabilizing effects of diversity on aboveground wood production in forest ecosystems: Linking patterns and processes. Ecol Lett 17(17):1560-1569.
White RE (2005) Principles and Practice of Soil Science: The Soil as a Natural Resource (Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, UK), 4th Ed.
Whittaker RH (1960) Vegetation of the Siskiyou Mountains, Oregon and California. Ecol Monogr 30(30):279-338.
Lennon JJ, Koleff P, Greenwood JJD, Gaston KJ (2001) The geographical structure of British bird distributions: Diversity, spatial turnover and scale. JAnim Ecol 70(70):966-979.
Wang S, Loreau M (2014) Ecosystem stability in space: α, β and γ variability. Ecol Lett 17(17):891-901.
R Core Team (2013) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Bates D, Maechler M, Bolker B, Walker S (2014) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4, R package version 1.1-7. Available at cran.r-project.org/web/packages/lme4/index.html. Accessed February 16, 2015.
