[en] Smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic clonal plasma cell disorder and bridges monoclonal gammopathyof undeterminedsignificance tomultiplemyeloma(MM),
based on higher levels of circulating monoclonal immunoglobulin and bone marrow plasmocytosis without end-organ damage. Until a Spanish study reported fewer MM-related
events and better overall survival among patients with highrisk SMM treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, prior studies had failed to show improved survival with earlier intervention, although a reduction in skeletal-related events (without any impact on disease progression) has been described with bisphosphonate use. Risk factors have now been defined, and a subset of ultra-high-risk patients have been reclassified by the International Myeloma Working Group asMM, and thus will require optimalMMtreatment, based on biomarkers that identify patients with a.80% risk of progression. The number of these redefined patients is
small (∼10%), but important to unravel, because their risk of progression to overt MM is substantial ($80% within 2 years). Patients with a high-risk cytogenetic profile are not yet considered for early treatment, because groups are heterogeneous and risk factors other than cytogenetics are deemed to weight higher. Because patients with ultra-highrisk SMM are now considered as MMand may be treated as such, concerns exist that earlier therapy may increase the risk of selecting resistant clones and induce side effects and costs. Therefore, an even more accurate identification of patients who would benefit from interventions needs to be
performed, and clinical judgment and careful discussion of pros and cons of treatment initiation needs to be undertaken. For the greater majority ofSMMpatients, the standard of care
remains observation until development of symptomatic MM occurs, encouraging participation in ongoing and upcoming SMM/early MM clinical trials, as well as consideration of bisphosphonate use in patients with early bone loss.
Disciplines :
Hematology
Author, co-author :
CAERS, Jo ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Hématologie clinique
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Engelhardt M, Terpos E, Kleber M et al. European Myeloma Network recommendations on the evaluation and treatment of newly diagnosed patients with multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2014;99:232-242.
Rollig C, Knop S, Bornhauser M. Multiple myeloma. Lancet 2015;385:2197-2208.
Kyle RA, Greipp PR. Smoldering multiple myeloma. N EnglJMed 1980;302:1347-1349.
International Myeloma Working Group. Criteria for the classification of monoclonal gammopathies, multiple myeloma and related disorders: A report of the International Myeloma Working Group. Br J Haematol 2003;121:749-757.
Caers J, Vekemans M-C, Bries G et al. Diagnosis and follow-up of monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance; information for referring physicians. Ann Med 2013;45:413-422.
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol 2014;15:e538-e548.
Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM et al. Clinical course and prognosis ofsmoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2007;356: 2582-2590.
Neben K, Jauch A, Hielscher T et al. Progression in smoldering myeloma is independently determined bythe chromosomal abnormalities del(17p), t(4;14),gain 1q, hyperdiploidy, andtumorload. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:4325-4332.
Dhodapkar MV, Sexton R, Waheed S et al. Clinical, genomic, and imaging predictors of myeloma progression from asymptomatic monoclonal gammopathies (SWOG S0120). Blood 2014;123: 78-85.
Rajkumar SV, Larson D, Kyle RA. Diagnosis of smoldering multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2011; 365:474-475.
Kastritis E, Terpos E, Moulopoulos L et al. Extensive bone marrow infiltration and abnormal free light chain ratio identifies patients with asymptomatic myeloma at high risk for progression to symptomatic disease. Leukemia 2013;27:947-953.
Rago A, Grammatico S, Za T et al. Prognostic factors associated with progression of smoldering multiple myeloma to symptomatic form. Cancer 2012;118:5544-5549.
Dispenzieri A, Stewart AK, Chanan-Khan A et al. Smoldering multiple myeloma requiring treatment: Time for a new definition? Blood 2013;122: 4172-4181.
Rajkumar SV, Kyle RA, Therneau TM et al. Serum free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Blood 2005;106: 812-817.
Dispenzieri A, Kyle RA, Katzmann JA et al. Immunoglobulin free light chain ratio is an independent risk factor for progression of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. Blood 2008; 111:785-789.
Larsen JT, Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A et al. Serum free light chain ratio as a biomarker for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2013;27: 941-946.
Caers J, Withofs N, Hillengass J et al. The roleof positron emission tomography-computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis and follow up of multiple myeloma. Haematologica 2014;99:629-637.
Moulopoulos LA, Dimopoulos MA, Smith TL et al. Prognostic significance of magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 1995;13:251-256.
Hillengass J, Fechtner K, Weber MA et al. Prognostic significance of focal lesions in whole- body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2010; 28:1606-1610.
Kastritis E, Moulopoulos LA, Terpos E et al. The prognostic importance of the presence of more than one focal lesion in spine MRI of patients with asymptomatic (smoldering) multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2014;28:2402-2403.
Merz M, Hielscher T, Wagner B et al. Predictive value of longitudinal whole-body magnetic resonance imaging in patients with smoldering multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2014;28:1902-1908.
Zamagni E, Nanni C, Gay F et al., 18F-FDG PET/ CT focal, but not osteolytic, lesions predict the progression of smoldering myeloma to active disease. Leukemia 2015 [Epub ahead of print]. Doi:10.1038/leu.2015.291.
Siontis B, Kumar S, Dispenzieri A et al. Positron emission tomography-computed tomographyin the diagnostic evaluation of smoldering multiple myeloma: Identification of patients needing therapy. Blood Cancer J 2015;5:e364.
Ocqueteau M, Orfao A, Almeida J et al. Immunophenotypiccharacterization ofplasmacells from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients. Implications for the differential diagnosis between MGUS and multiple myeloma. Am J Pathol 1998;152:1655-1665.
Perez-Persona E, Vidriales M-B, Mateo G et al. New criteria to identify riskof progression in monoclonal gammopathy of uncertain significance and smoldering multiple myeloma based on multiparameter flow cytometry analysis of bone marrow plasma cells. Blood 2007;110:2586-2592.
Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistentlyprecedes multiple myeloma: A prospective study. Blood 2009;113:5412-5417.
Rajkumar SV, Gupta V, Fonseca R et al. Impact ofprimary molecularcytogeneticabnormalitiesand riskofprogression in smoldering multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2013;27:1738-1744.
Khan R, Dhodapkar M, Rosenthal A et al. Four genes predict high risk of progression from smoldering to symptomatic multiple myeloma (SWOG S0120). Haematologica 2015;100:1214-1221.
Paiva B, Paino T, Sayagues J-M et al. Detailed characterization of multiple myeloma circulating tumor cells shows unique phenotypic, cytogenetic, functional, and circadian distribution profile. Blood 2013;122:3591-3598.
Bianchi G, Kyle RA, Larson DR et al. High levels of peripheral blood circulating plasma cells as a specific risk factor for progression of smoldering multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2013;27:680-685.
Billadeau D, Van Ness B, Kimlinger T et al. Clonal circulating cells are common in plasma cell proliferative disorders: A comparison of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance, smoldering multiple myeloma, and active myeloma. Blood 1996;88:289-296.
Cherry BM, Korde N, Kwok M et al. Modeling progression risk for smoldering multiple myeloma: Results from a prospective clinical study. Leuk Lymphoma 2013;54:2215-2218.
Kyle RA, Durie BG, Rajkumar SV et al. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) and smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma: IMWG consensus perspectives risk factors for progression and guidelines for monitoring and management. Leukemia 2010;24: 1121-1127.
Rajkumar SV, Merlini G, San Miguel JF. Haematological cancer: Redefining myeloma. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2012;9:494-496.
Hjorth M, Hellquist L, Holmberg E et al. Initial versus deferred melphalan-prednisone therapy for asymptomatic multiple myeloma stage I—a randomized study. Eur J Haematol 1993;50:95-102.
Riccardi A, Mora O, Tinelli C et al. Long-term survival of stage I multiple myeloma given chemotherapy just after diagnosis or at progression of the disease: A multicentre randomized study. Br J Cancer 2000;82:1254-1260.
Detweiler-Short K, Hayman S, Gertz MA et al. Long-term results of single-agent thalidomide as initial therapy for asymptomatic (smoldering or indolent) myeloma. Am J Hematol 2010;85:737-740.
Barlogie B, van Rhee F, Shaughnessy JD Jr. et al. Seven-year median time to progression with thalidomide for smoldering myeloma: Partial response identifies subset requiring earlier salvage therapy for symptomatic disease. Blood 2008;112: 3122-3125.
Witzig TE, Laumann KM, Lacy MQ et al. A phase III randomized trial of thalidomide plus zoledronic acid versus zoledronic acid alone in patients with asymptomatic multiple myeloma. Leukemia 2013; 27:220-225.
D'Arena G, Gobbi PG, Broglia C et al. Pamidr- onate versus observation in asymptomatic myeloma: Final results with long-term follow-up of a randomized study. Leuk Lymphoma 2011;52: 771-775.
Martin A, Garcia-Sanz R, Hernandez J et al. Pamidronate induces bone formation in patients with smouldering or indolent myeloma, with no significant anti-tumour effect. Br J Haematol 2002; 118:239-242.
Musto P, Falcone A, Sanpaolo G et al. Pamidr- onate for early-stage, untreated myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2003;21:3177-3178; author reply 3178.
Musto P, Petrucci MT, Bringhen S et al. A multicenter, randomized clinical trial comparing zoledronic acid versus observation in patients with asymptomatic myeloma. Cancer 2008;113: 1588-1595.
Terpos E, Morgan G, Dimopoulos MA et al. InternationalMyeloma Working Group recommendations for the treatment of multiple myeloma- related bone disease. J Clin Oncol 2013;31: 2347-2357.
Lust JA, Lacy MQ, Zeldenrust SR et al. Induction of a chronic disease state in patients with smoldering or indolent multiple myeloma by targeting interleukin 1b-induced interleukin 6 production and the myeloma proliferative component. Mayo Clin Proc 2009;84:114-122.
Mateos M-V, Hernandez M-T, Giraldo P et al. Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 2013; 369:438-447.
Korde N, Roschewski M, Zingone A et al. Treatment with carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone with lenalidomide extension in patients with smoldering or newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. JAMA Oncol 2015;1:746-754.
Selder R, Pandurevic M, Moller M-D et al. First results of the Interdisciplinary Comprehensive Cancer Center Freiburg Tumor Board Multiple Myeloma assessing questions, advice adherence, satisfaction of patients, participants and reffering physicians, inclusion of difficult-to-treat-MM pts in clinical trials (CT) and patient outcome. Paper presented at 56th American Society of Hematology Annual Meeting and Exposition; December 6-9, 2014, San Francisco, CA.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.