Article (Scientific journals)
Tradeoffs between Maize Silage Yield and Nitrate Leaching in a Mediterranean Nitrate- Vulnerable Zone under Current and Projected Climate Scenarios
Basso, Bruno; Giola, Pietro; Dumont, Benjamin et al.
2016In PLoS ONE, 11(1): e0146360, p. 24
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
journal.pone.0146360.pdf
Publisher postprint (1.73 MB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
nitrate leaching; climate change; manure; rotations; maize; triticale; SALUS; Nitrate-Vulnerable-Zone
Abstract :
[en] Future climatic changes may have profound impacts on cropping systems and affect the agronomic and environmental sustainability of current N management practices. The objectives of this work were to i) evaluate the ability of the SALUS crop model to reproduce experimental crop yield and soil nitrate dynamics results under different N fertilizer treatments in a farmer’s field, ii) use the SALUS model to estimate the impacts of different N fertilizer treatments on NO3- leaching under future climate scenarios generated by twenty nine different global circulation models, and iii) identify the management system that best minimizes NO3- leaching and maximizes yield under projected future climate conditions. A field experiment (maize-triticale rotation) was conducted in a nitrate vulnerable zone on the west coast of Sardinia, Italy to evaluate N management strategies that include urea fertilization (NMIN), conventional fertilization with dairy slurry and urea (CONV), and no fertilization (N0). An ensemble of 29 global circulation models (GCM) was used to simulate different climate scenarios for two Representative Circulation Pathways (RCP6.0 and RCP8.5) and evaluate potential nitrate leaching and biomass production in this region over the next 50 years. Data collected from two growing seasons showed that the SALUS model adequately simulated both nitrate leaching and crop yield, with a relative error that ranged between 0.4% and 13%. Nitrate losses under RCP8.5 were lower than under RCP6.0 only for NMIN. Accordingly, levels of plant N uptake, N use efficiency and biomass production were higher under RCP8.5 than RCP6.0. Simulations under both RCP scenarios indicated that the NMIN treatment demonstrated both the highest biomass production and NO3- losses. The newly proposed best management practice (BMP), developed from crop N uptake data, was identified as the optimal N fertilizer management practice since it minimized NO3- leaching and maximized biomass production over the long term.
Disciplines :
Computer science
Environmental sciences & ecology
Agriculture & agronomy
Author, co-author :
Basso, Bruno
Giola, Pietro
Dumont, Benjamin  ;  Université de Liège > Agronomie, Bio-ingénierie et Chimie (AgroBioChem) > Phytotechnie des régions tempérées
De Antoni Migliorati, Massimiliano
Cammarano, Davide
Pruneddu, Giovanni
Giunta, Francesco
Language :
English
Title :
Tradeoffs between Maize Silage Yield and Nitrate Leaching in a Mediterranean Nitrate- Vulnerable Zone under Current and Projected Climate Scenarios
Publication date :
19 January 2016
Journal title :
PLoS ONE
eISSN :
1932-6203
Publisher :
Public Library of Science, San Franscisco, United States - California
Volume :
11(1): e0146360
Pages :
24 p. p.
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
USDA NIFA - United States. Department of Agriculture. National Institute of Food and Agriculture [US-DC] [US-DC]
Funding number :
USDA NIFA Award no. 2015-68007-23133 and 2011-68002-30190
Funding text :
Sardinian Regional Authorities (P.O.R. Sardegna F.S. E. 2007–2013)
Commentary :
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the USDA. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Available on ORBi :
since 22 January 2016

Statistics


Number of views
81 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
169 (2 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
12
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
6
OpenCitations
 
10

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi