Article (Scientific journals)
Development of a self-administrated quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia in elderly subjects: the SarQol
Beaudart, Charlotte; Biver, Emmanuel; Reginster, Jean-Yves et al.
2015In Age and Ageing, 44, p. 960-966
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
Development of a self-administrated quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia.pdf
Publisher postprint (211.21 kB)
Request a copy

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
sarcopenia; quality of life; questionnaire; older people
Abstract :
[en] BACKGROUND: the impact of sarcopenia on quality of life is currently assessed by generic tools. However, these tools may not detect subtle effects of this specific condition on quality of life. OBJECTIVE: the aim of this study was to develop a sarcopenia-specific quality of life questionnaire (SarQoL, Sarcopenia Quality of Life) designed for community-dwelling elderly subjects aged 65 years and older. SETTINGS: participants were recruited in an outpatient clinic in Liège, Belgium. SUBJECTS: sarcopenic subjects aged 65 years or older. METHODS: the study was articulated in the following four stages: (i) Item generation-based on literature review, sarcopenic subjects' opinion, experts' opinion, focus groups; (ii) Item reduction-based on sarcopenic subjects' and experts' preferences; (iii) Questionnaire generation-developed during an expert meeting; (iv) Pretest of the questionnaire-based on sarcopenic subjects' opinion. RESULTS: the final version of the questionnaire consists of 55 items translated into 22 questions rated on a 4-point Likert scale. These items are organised into seven domains of dysfunction: Physical and mental health, Locomotion, Body composition, Functionality, Activities of daily living, Leisure activities and Fears. In view of the pretest, the SarQoL is easy to complete, independently, in ∼10 min. CONCLUSIONS: the first version of the SarQoL, a specific quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenic subjects, has been developed and has been shown to be comprehensible by the target population. Investigations are now required to test the psychometric properties (internal consistency, test-retest reliability, divergent and convergent validity, discriminant validity, floor and ceiling effects) of this questionnaire.
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Beaudart, Charlotte ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Biver, Emmanuel
Reginster, Jean-Yves  ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Rizzoli, René
Rolland, Yves
Bautmans, Ivan
PETERMANS, Jean ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Gériatrie
GILLAIN, Sophie ;  Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Gériatrie
Buckinx, Fanny  ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
van beveren, Julien;  Université de Liège - ULiège
Jacqemain, Marc;  Université de Liège - ULiège
Italiano, Patrick ;  Université de Liège > Faculté des sciences sociales > Sociologie des identités contemporaines
Dardenne, Nadia  ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
Bruyère, Olivier  ;  Université de Liège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique, Epidémiologie et Economie de la santé
More authors (4 more) Less
Language :
English
Title :
Development of a self-administrated quality of life questionnaire for sarcopenia in elderly subjects: the SarQol
Publication date :
2015
Journal title :
Age and Ageing
ISSN :
0002-0729
eISSN :
1468-2834
Publisher :
Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom
Volume :
44
Pages :
960-966
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Available on ORBi :
since 20 November 2015

Statistics


Number of views
86 (18 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
10 (10 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
90
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
56
OpenCitations
 
63

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi