Necitumumab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (INSPIRE): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study.
[en] BACKGROUND: Necitumumab is a second-generation recombinant human immunoglobulin G1 EGFR monoclonal antibody that competitively inhibits ligand binding. We aimed to compare necitumumab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin with pemetrexed and cisplatin alone in patients with previously untreated, stage IV, non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHODS: We did this randomised, open-label, controlled phase 3 study at 103 sites in 20 countries. Patients aged 18 years or older, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ function, were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with a block randomisation scheme (block size of four) via a telephone-based interactive voice-response system or interactive web-response system. Patients received either cisplatin 75 mg/m(2) and pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) on day 1 of a 3-week cycle for a maximum of six cycles alone, or with necitumumab 800 mg on days 1 and 8. Necitumumab was continued after the end of chemotherapy until disease progression or unacceptable toxic effects. Randomisation was stratified by smoking history, ECOG performance status, disease histology, and geographical region. Patients and study investigators were not masked to group assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00982111. FINDINGS: Between Nov 11, 2009, and Feb 2, 2011, we randomly assigned 633 patients to receive either necitumumab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin (n=315) or pemetrexed and cisplatin alone (n=318). Enrolment was stopped on Feb 2, 2011, after a recommendation from the independent data monitoring committee. There was no significant difference in overall survival between treatment groups, with a median overall survival of 11.3 months (95% CI 9.5-13.4) in the necitumumab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin group versus 11.5 months (10.1-13.1) in the pemetrexed and cisplatin group (hazard ratio 1.01 [95% CI 0.84-1.21]; p=0.96). The incidence of grade 3 or worse adverse events, including deaths, was higher in the necitumumab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin group than in the pemetrexed and cisplatin group; in particular, deaths regarded as related to study drug were reported in 15 (5%) of 304 patients in the necitumumab group versus nine (3%) of 312 patients in the pemetrexed and cisplatin group. Serious adverse events were likewise more frequent in the necitumumab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin group than in the pemetrexed and cisplatin group (155 [51%] of 304 vs 127 [41%] of 312 patients). Patients in the necitumumab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin group had more grade 3-4 rash (45 [15%] of 304 vs one [<1%] of 312 patients in the pemetrexed and cisplatin alone group), hypomagnesaemia (23 [8%] vs seven [2%] patients), and grade 3 or higher venous thromboembolic events (23 [8%] vs 11 [4%] patients) than did those in the pemetrexed and cisplatin alone group. INTERPRETATION: Our findings show no evidence to suggest that the addition of necitumumab to pemetrexed and cisplatin increases survival of previously untreated patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC. Unless future studies identify potentially useful predictive biomarkers, necitumumab is unlikely to provide benefit in this patient population when combined with pemetrexed and cisplatin. FUNDING: Eli Lilly and Company.
LOUIS, Renaud ; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège - CHU > Pneumologie-Allergologie
Language :
English
Title :
Necitumumab plus pemetrexed and cisplatin as first-line therapy in patients with stage IV non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (INSPIRE): an open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 study.
Publication date :
March 2015
Journal title :
The Lancet Oncology
ISSN :
1470-2045
eISSN :
1474-5488
Publisher :
The Lancet Publishing Group, United Kingdom
Volume :
16
Issue :
3
Pages :
328-37
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Commentary :
Copyright (c) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Travis, W.D., Brambilla, E., Riely, G.J., New pathologic classification of lung cancer: relevance for clinical practice and clinical trials (2013) J Clin Oncol, 31, pp. 992-1001
Thomas, A., Rajan, A., Lopez-Chavez, A., Wang, Y., Giaccone, G., From targets to targeted therapies and molecular profiling in non-small cell lung carcinoma (2013) Ann Oncol, 24, pp. 577-585
Reck, M., Popat, S., Reinmuth, N., Metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up (2014) Ann Oncol, 25. , iii27-iii39
Cooper, W.A., Lam, D.C., O'Toole, S.A., Minna, J.D., Molecular biology of lung cancer (2013) J Thorac Dis, 5, pp. S479-S490
Gerber, D.E., Gandhi, L., Costa, D.B., Management and future directions in non-small cell lung cancer with known activating mutations (2014) Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book, pp. e353-e365
Kerr, K.M., Bubendorf, L., Edelman, M.J., Second ESMO consensus conference on lung cancer: pathology and molecular biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer (2014) Ann Oncol, 25, pp. 1682-1690
Douillard, J.Y., Pirker, R., O'Byrne, K.J., Relationship between EGFR expression, EGFR mutation status, and the efficacy of chemotherapy plus cetuximab in FLEX study patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (2014) J Thorac Oncol, 9, pp. 717-724
Pirker, R., Pereira, J.R., Szczesna, A., Cetuximab plus chemotherapy in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (FLEX): an open-label randomised phase III trial (2009) Lancet, 373, pp. 1525-1531
Dienstmann, R., Felip, E., Necitumumab in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer: translation from preclinical to clinical development (2011) Expert Opin Biol Ther, 11, pp. 1223-1231
Cohen, M.H., Justice, R., Pazdur, R., Approval summary: pemetrexed in the initial treatment of advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (2009) Oncologist, 14, pp. 930-935
Scagliotti, G.V., Parikh, P., von Pawel, J., Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus gemcitabine with cisplatin plus pemetrexed in chemotherapy-naive patients with advanced-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (2008) J Clin Oncol, 26, pp. 3543-3551
Thatcher, N., Hirsch, F.R., Szczesna, A., A randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III study of gemcitabine-cisplatin (GC) chemotherapy plus necitumumab (IMC-11F8/LY3012211) versus GC alone in the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with stage IV squamous non-small cell lung cancer (sq-NSCLC) (2014) J Clin Oncol, 32, p. 8008
Edge, S., Byrd, D.R., Compton, C.C., Fritz, A.G., Greene, F.L., Trotti, A., (2010) AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, , Springer, New York
Therasse, P., Arbuck, S.G., Eisenhauer, E.A., New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada (2000) J Natl Cancer Inst, 92, pp. 205-216
(1994) Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of diseases of the heart and great vessels, , The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association, Little, Brown and Company, Boston, MA
(2009), International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) MedDRA the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, Northrop Grumman MSSO, Chantilly, VA
Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 3.0, , http://ctep.cancer.gov/protocolDevelopment/electronic_applications/docs/ctcaev3.pdf, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of HealthNational Institutes of Health, US Department of Health and Human ServicesUS Department of Health and Human Services, (accessed Feb 8, 2015)
Hollen, P.J., Gralla, R.J., Kris, M.G., Measurement of quality of life in patients with lung cancer in multicenter trials of new therapies. Psychometric assessment of the Lung Cancer Symptom Scale (1994) Cancer, 73, pp. 2087-2098
Nord, E., EuroQol: health-related quality of life measurement. Valuations of health states by the general public in Norway (1991) Health Policy, 18, pp. 25-36
Pirker, R., Pereira, J.R., von Pawel, J., EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study (2012) Lancet Oncol, 13, pp. 33-42
Hirsch, F.R., Varella-Garcia, M., Bunn, P.A., Epidermal growth factor receptor in non-small-cell lung carcinomas: correlation between gene copy number and protein expression and impact on prognosis (2003) J Clin Oncol, 21, pp. 3798-3807
Witteveen, P.O., Ruijter, R., A phase I pharmacologic study of necitumumab (IMC-11F8), a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody directed against EGFR in patients with advanced solid malignancies (2010) Clin Cancer Res, 16, pp. 1915-1923. , Kuenen B1
Kim, E.S., Neubauer, M., Cohn, A., Docetaxel or pemetrexed with or without cetuximab in recurrent or progressive non-small-cell lung cancer after platinum-based therapy: a phase 3, open-label, randomised trial (2013) Lancet Oncol, 14, pp. 1326-1336
Pujol, J.L., Pirker, R., Lynch, T.J., Meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized trials of chemotherapy plus cetuximab as first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (2014) Lung Cancer, 83, pp. 211-218
Petrelli, F., Borgonovo, K., Cabiddu, M., Ghilardi, M., Barni, S., Risk of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody-related hypomagnesemia: systematic review and pooled analysis of randomized studies (2012) Expert Opin Drug Saf, 11, pp. S9-19
Segaert, S., Van Cutsem, E., Clinical signs, pathophysiology and management of skin toxicity during therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (2005) Ann Oncol, 16, pp. 1425-1433
Seng, S., Liu, Z., Chiu, S.K., Risk of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer treated with cisplatin: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2012) J Clin Oncol, 30, pp. 4416-4426
Petrelli, F., Cabiddu, M., Borgonovo, K., Barni, S., Risk of venous and arterial thromboembolic events associated with anti-EGFR agents: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (2012) Ann Oncol, 23, pp. 1672-1679
Butts, C.A., Bodkin, D., Middleman, E.L., Randomized phase II study of gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin, with or without cetuximab, as first-line therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic non small-cell lung cancer (2007) J Clin Oncol, 25, pp. 5777-5784
Lynch, T.J., Patel, T., Dreisbach, L., Cetuximab and first-line taxane/carboplatin chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: results of the randomized multicenter phase III trial BMS099 (2010) J Clin Oncol, 28, pp. 911-917
Rosell, R., Robinet, G., Szczesna, A., Randomized phase II study of cetuximab plus cisplatin/vinorelbine compared with cisplatin/vinorelbine alone as first-line therapy in EGFR-expressing advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (2008) Ann Oncol, 19, pp. 362-369
Hartmann, J.T., Kollmannsberger, C., Cascorbi, I., A phase I pharmacokinetic study of matuzumab in combination with paclitaxel in patients with EGFR-expressing advanced non-small cell lung cancer (2013) Invest New Drugs, 31, pp. 661-668
Schiller, J.H., von Pawel, J., Schutt, P., Pemetrexed with or without matuzumab as second-line treatment for patients with stage IIIB/IV non-small cell lung cancer (2010) J Thorac Oncol, 5, pp. 1977-1985
Blumenschein, G.R., Reckamp, K., Stephenson, G.J., Phase 1b study of motesanib, an oral angiogenesis inhibitor, in combination with carboplatin/paclitaxel and/or panitumumab for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (2010) Clin Cancer Res, 16, pp. 279-290
Crawford, J., Swanson, P., Schwarzenberger, P., A phase 2 randomized trial of paclitaxel and carboplatin with or without panitumumab for first-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (2013) J Thorac Oncol, 8, pp. 1510-1518
Meert, A.P., Martin, B., Delmotte, P., The role of EGF-R expression on patient survival in lung cancer: a systematic review with meta-analysis (2002) Eur Respir J, 20, pp. 975-981
Nakamura, H., Kawasaki, N., Taguchi, M., Kabasawa, K., Survival impact of epidermal growth factor receptor overexpression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis (2006) Thorax, 61, pp. 140-145
Nicholson, R.I., Gee, J.M., Harper, M.E., EGFR and cancer prognosis (2001) Eur J Cancer, 37, pp. S9-15