[en] The scientific method is often presented, e.g. to children, as a linear process,
starting by a question and ending by the elaboration of a theory, with a few experiments
in-between. The reality of the building of science is much more complex,
with back-and-forth motions between theories and observations, with some intervention
of technology and randomness. This complex process is not always correctly
understood and assimilated, even amongst scientists. The hero cult, mixed with
some revisionism, still exists despite in-depth historical studies. In this context, it
may be useful to comparatively examine the reaction to crucial observations, their
interpretation and their impact on the contemporaneous theory development. Four
examples are presented here, all linked to the question of the ‘construction of the
heavens’ but at different epochs.
Disciplines :
Arts & humanities: Multidisciplinary, general & others Space science, astronomy & astrophysics
Author, co-author :
Nazé, Yaël ; Université de Liège > Groupe d'astrophysique des hautes énergies (GAPHE)
Language :
French
Title :
Structure de l'univers - quand l'observation guide la théorie... ou pas
Publication date :
December 2014
Journal title :
Azimuth : Philosophical Coordinates in Modern and Contemporary Age
ISSN :
2282-4863
eISSN :
2283-3153
Publisher :
edizioni di storia e letteratura
Special issue title :
Ratio mundi - possible cosmologies between narrative and logic