heterogeneity of variance; (co)variance structure; test-day yield
Abstract :
[en] First-lactation test-day milk, fat, and protein yields from New York, Wisconsin, and California herds from 1990 through 2000 were adjusted additively for age and lactation stage. A random regression model with thirdorder Legendre polynomials for permanent environmental and genetic effects was used. The model included a random effect with the same polynomial regressions for 2 yr of calvings within herd (herd-time effect) to provide herd-specific lactation curves that can change every 2 yr. (Co)variance components were estimated using expectation-maximization REML simultaneously with phenotypic variances that were modeled using a structural variance model. Maximum heritability for test-day milk yield was estimated to be ∼20% around 200 to 250 d in milk; heritabilities were slightly lower for test-day fat and protein yields. Herd-time effects explained 12 to 20% of phenotypic variance and had the greatest impact at start of lactation. Variances of test-day yields increased with time, subclass size, and milking frequency. Test month had limited influence on variance. Variance increased for cows in herds with low and high milk yields and for early and late lactation stages. Repeatabilities of variances observed for a given class of herd, test-day, and milking frequency were 14 to 17% across nested variance subclasses based on lactation stage.
Disciplines :
Genetics & genetic processes Animal production & animal husbandry
Author, co-author :
Gengler, Nicolas ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech > Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech
Wiggans, George; United States Department of Agriculture > Agricultural Research Service > Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory
Boldman, K. G., and A. E. Freeman. 1990. Adjustment for heterogeneity of variances by herd production level in dairy cow and sire evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 73:503-512.
Bormann, J., G. R. Wiggans, T. Druet, and N. Gengler. 2002. Estimating effects of permanent environment, lactation stage, age, and pregnancy on test-day yield. J. Dairy Sci. 85:263. [Online.]
Bormann, J., G. R. Wiggans, T. Druet, and N. Gengler. 2003. Within-herd effects of age at test day and lactation stage on test-day yields. J. Dairy Sci. 86:3765-3774.
Brotherstone, S., and W. G. Hill. 1986. Heterogeneity of variance amongst herds for milk production. Anim. Prod. 42:297-303.
Dodenhoff, J., and H. H. Swalve. 1998. Heterogeneity of variances across regions of northern Germany and adjustment in genetic evaluation. Livest. Prod. Sci. 53:225-236. [Online.] Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(97) 00129-2.
Druet, T., I. Misztal, M. Duangjinda, A. Reverter, and N. Gengler. 2001. Estimation of genetic covariances with Method R. J. Anim. Sci. 79:605-615.
Gengler, N., A. Tijani, G. R. Wiggans, and I. Misztal. 1999. Estimation of (co)variance function coefficients for test day yield with an expectation-maximization restricted maximum likelihood algorithm. J. Dairy Sci. 82:1849. [Online.]
Gengler, N., and G. R. Wiggans. 2001. Variance of effects of lactation stage within herd by herd yield. J. Dairy Sci. 84(Suppl. 1):216. (Abstr.)
Gengler, N., and G. R. Wiggans. 2002. Adjustment for heterogeneous genetic and non-genetic (co)variance structures in test-day models using a transformation on random regression effect regressors. Interbull Bull. 29:79-83. [Online]. Available: http://www-interbull.slu.se/bulletins/bulletin29/Gengler. pdf.
Lidauer, M., and E. A. Mäntysaari. 1999. Multiple trait reduced rank random regression test-day model for production traits. Interbull Bull. 22:74-80. [Online]. Available: http://www-interbull.slu.se/ bulletins/ bulletin22/LIDAUER.PDF.
Mayeres, P. 2002. Appui technique à la gestion des troupeaux de bovins laitiers à travers la mise en évidence d'influences spécifiques au niveau troupeaux et des vaches sur les performances et l'efficacité biologique. M.S. Thesis, Gembloux Agric. Univ., Belgium.
Meinert, T. R., R. E. Pearson, W. E. Vinson, and B. G. Cassell. 1988. Prediction of daughter's performance from dam's cow index adjusted for within-herd variance. J. Dairy Sci. 71:2220-2231.
Meuwissen, T. H. E., G. de Jong, and B. Engel. 1996. Joint estimation of breeding values and heterogeneous variances of large data files. J. Dairy Sci. 79:310-316.
Pool, M. H., L. L. G. Janss, and T. H. E. Meuwissen. 2000. Genetic parameters of Legendre polynomials for first parity lactation curves. J. Dairy Sci. 83:2640-2649.
Pool, M. H., and T. H. E. Meuwissen. 2000. Reduction of the number of parameters needed for a polynomial random regression test-day model. Livest. Prod. Sci. 64:133-145. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301- 6226(99)00166-9.
Reverter, A., B. L. Golden, R. M. Bourdon, and J. S. Brinks. 1994. Method R variance components procedure: Application on the simple breeding value model. J. Anim. Sci. 72:2247-2253.
Tijani, A., G. R. Wiggans, C. P. Van Tassell, J. C. Philpot, and N. Gengler. 1999. Use of (co)variance functions to describe (co)variances for test day yield. J. Dairy Sci. 82:226. [Online.]
Vargas, B., E. Perez, and J. A. M. Van Arendonk. 1998. Analysis of test day yield data of Costa Rican dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 81:255-263.
Weigel, K. A., and T. J. Lawlor. 1994. Adjustment for heterogeneous variance in genetic evaluations for conformation of United States Holsteins. J. Dairy Sci. 77:1691-1701.
Wiggans, G. R., and P. M. VanRaden. 1991. Method and effect of adjustments for heterogeneous variance. J. Dairy Sci. 74:4350-4357.
Wiggans, G. R., P. M. VanRaden, J. Bormann, J. C. Philpot, T. Druet, and N. Gengler. 2002. Deriving lactation yields from test-day yields adjusted for lactation stage, age, pregnancy, and herd test date. J. Dairy Sci. 85:264.