[en] The main goal of this study was to develop, apply, and validate a new method to predict an indicator for CH4 eructed by dairy cows using milk mid-infrared (MIR) spectra. A novel feature of this model was the consideration of lactation stage to reflect changes in the metabolic status of the cow. A total of 446 daily CH4 measurements were obtained using the SF6 method on 142 Jersey, Holstein, and Holstein-Jersey cows. The corresponding milk samples were collected during these CH4 measurements and were analyzed using MIR spectroscopy. A first derivative was applied to the milk MIR spectra. To validate the novel calibration equation incorporating days in milk (DIM), 2 calibration processes were developed: the first was based only on CH4 measurements and milk MIR spectra (independent of lactation stage; ILS); the second included milk MIR spectra and DIM information (dependent on lactation stage; DLS) by using linear and quadratic modified Legendre polynomials. The coefficients of determination of ILS and DLS equations were 0.77 and 0.75, respectively, with standard error of calibration of 63 g/d of CH4 for both calibration equations. These equations were applied to 1,674,763 milk MIR spectra from Holstein cows in the first 3 parities and between 5 and 365 DIM. The average CH4 indicators were 428, 444, and 448 g/d by ILS and 444, 467, and 471 g/d by DLS for cows in first, second, and third lactation, respectively. Behavior of the DLS indicator throughout the lactations was in agreement with the literature with values increasing between 0 and 100 DIM and decreasing thereafter. Conversely, the ILS indicator of CH4 emission decreased at the beginning of the lactation and increased until the end of the lactation, which differs from the literature. Therefore, the DLS indicator seems to better reflect biological processes that drive CH4 emissions than the ILS indicator. The ILS and DLS equations were applied to an independent data set, which included 59 respiration chamber measurements of CH4 obtained from animals of a different breed across a different production system. Results indicated that the DLS equation was much more robust than the ILS equation allowing development of indicators of CH4 emissions by dairy cows. Integration of DIM information into the prediction equation was found to be a good strategy to obtain biologically meaningful CH4 values from lactating cows by accounting for biological changes that occur throughout the lactation.
Aguerre M.J., Wattiaux M., Powell J.M., Broderick G., Arndt C. Effect of forage-to-concentrate ratio in dairy cow diets on emission of methane, carbon dioxide, and ammonia, lactation performance, and manure excretion. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:3081-3093. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-4011.
Berry D.P., Horan B., O'Donovan M., Buckley F., Kennedy E., McEvoy M., Dillon P. Genetics of grass dry matter intake, energy balance, and digestibility in grazing Irish dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007, 90:4835-4845.
Buehler, K., and M. Wanner. 2012. Chapter 6: Metabolic Centre of the University of Zurich and ETH Zurich (under construction). Pages 89-106 in Technical Manual on Respiration Chamber Designs. C. Pinares and G. Waghorn, ed. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Wellington, New Zealand. Accessed April 2015. http://http://www.globalresearchalliance.org/research/livestock/%20activities/knowledge/chamber-designs/.
Chilliard Y., Ferlay A., Mansbridge R.M., Doreau M. Ruminant milk fat plasticity: nutritional control of saturated, polyunsaturated, trans and conjugated fatty acids. Ann. Zootech. 2000, 49:181-205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/animres:2000117.
Chilliard Y., Martin C., Rouel J., Doreau M. Milk fatty acids in dairy cows fed whole crude linseed, extruded linseed, or linseed oil, and their relationship with methane output. J. Dairy Sci. 2009, 92:5199-5211. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2009-2375.
Dehareng F., Delfosse C., Froidmont E., Soyeurt H., Martin C., Gengler N., Vanlierde A., Dardenne P. Potential use of milk mid-infrared spectra to predict individual methane emission of dairy cows. Animal 2012, 6:1694-1701. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1751731112000456.
Dijkstra J., van Zijderveld S.M., Apajalahti J.A., Bannink A., Gerrits W.J.J., Newbold J.R., Perdok H.B., Berends H. Relationships between methane production and milk fatty acid profiles in dairy cattle. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2011, 166-167:590-595. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2011.04.042.
Garnsworthy P.C., Craigon J., Hernandez-Medrano J.H., Saunders N. Variation among individual dairy cows in methane measurements made on farm during milking. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:3181-3189. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4606.
Gengler N., Tijani A., Wiggans G.R., Misztal I. Estimation of (co)variance function coefficients for test day yield with a expectation-maximization restricted maximum likelihood algorithm. J. Dairy Sci. 1999, 82:1849.e1-1849.e23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75417-2.
Johnson K.A., Johnson D.E. Methane emissions from cattle. J. Anim. Sci. 1995, 73:2483-2492.
Mills J.A.N., Kebreab E., Yates C.M., Crompton L.A., Cammell S.B., Dhanoa M.S., Agnew R.E., France J. Alternative approaches to predicting methane emissions from dairy cows. J. Anim. Sci. 2003, 81:3141-3150.
Misztal, I. 2012. BLUPF90 Family of Programs. Accessed April 2015. http://http://nce.ads.uga.edu/wiki/doku.php/.
Muñoz C., Yan T., Wills D.A., Murray S., Gordon A.W. Comparison of the sulfur hexafluoride tracer and respiration chamber techniques for estimating methane emissions and correction for rectum methane output from dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2012, 95:3139-3148. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2011-4298.
Soyeurt H., Dehareng F., Gengler N., McParland S., Wall E., Berry D.P., Coffey M., Dardenne P. Mid-infrared prediction of bovine milk fatty acids across multiple breeds, production systems, and countries. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:1657-1667. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3408.
Vallimont J.E., Dechow C.D., Daubert J.M., Dekleva M.W., Blum J.W., Barlieb C.M., Liu W., Varga G.A., Heinrichs A.J., Baumrucker C.R. Heritability of gross feed efficiency and associations with yield, intake, residual intake, body weight, and body condition score in 11 commercial Pennsylvania tie stalls. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:2108-2113. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3888.
van Zijderveld S.M., Fonken B., Dijkstra J., Gerrits W.J.J., Perdok H.B., Fokkink W., Newbold J.R. Effects of a combination of feed additives on methane production, diet digestibility, and animal performance in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2011, 94:1445-1454. http://dx.doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3635.
Willmott C., Matsuura K. Advantages of the mean absolute error (MAE) over the root mean square error (RMSE) in assessing average model performance. Clim. Res. 2005, 30:79-82.