path dependency; development of SMEs; Ukraine; publlic policy; role of government; transition economies
Abstract :
[en] This article studies evolution of governmental support for SME
development from the times of Perestroika until 2013. Guided by
institutional theory, the article revises SME development in Ukraine
and explains government actions through the prism of path dependence.
The analysis is conducted within a matrix logic resuming
the data by several periods of time corresponding to changes in
the Ukrainian government and being juxtaposed to the main
stages of the path dependence analytical framework. The study
reveals main trends in governmental support for small business
and main challenges remaining nowadays.
Research Center/Unit :
CEPE - Centre d'Études de la Performance des Entreprises - ULiège
Disciplines :
Economic systems & public economics
Author, co-author :
Shutyak, Yuliya; Université de Liège - ULiège > HEC School of Management > Centre d'Etude de la Performance des Entreprises
Van Caillie, Didier ; Université de Liège > HEC-Ecole de gestion : UER > Diagnostic et contrôle de l'entreprise
Language :
English
Title :
The Role of Government in Path- Dependent Development of SME Sector in Ukraine
Alternative titles :
[fr] Le rôle du gouvernement dans le développement dirigé du secteur des PME en Ukraine
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Anon. 2011. Yanukovish is asked not to kill small and medium business [Yanukovicha prosiat ne unichtozhat melkiy i sredniy bizness]. http://www.pravda.com.ua/rus/news/2011/11/21/6772968/.
W.Barnes,, M.Gartland, and M.Stack. 2004. Old habits die hard: Path dependency and behavioral lock-in. Journal of Economic Issues 38 (2): 371–378.
W.Bartlett, 2001. SME development policies in different stages of transition. MOCT-MOST: Economic Policy in Transitional Economies 11 (3): 197–204.
Central Statistical Office of Poland. 2014. Activity of non-financial enterprises in 2012. Warsaw.
Communist Party of Ukraine. 1993. I (XXIX) Congress of the Communist Party of Ukraine. http://www.kpu.ua/ru/1222/i-xxix-sezd-kompartii-ukraini.
Decree on Measures for Establishment and Development of Small Enterprises. 1990. (SP SSSR, 1990, No. 19, p. 101).
R.Doern, 2009. Investigating barriers to SME growth and development in transition environments: A critique and suggestions for developing the methodology. International Small Business Journal 27 (3): 275–305.
Economic Code of Ukraine. 2003. (Ofitsiynyi Visnyk Ukrainy, 2003, No. 11, p. 303), The Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine.
European Commission. 2000. The European Charter for small enterprises. European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/files/sme_definition/sme_user_guide_en.pdf
European Commission. 2005. The new SME definition: User guide and model declaration.
L.Fuxman, 1997. Ethical dilemmas of doing business in post-Soviet Ukraine. Journal of Business Ethics 16: 1273–1282.
C.Hay,, and D.Wincott. 1998. Structure, agency and historical institutionalism. Political Studies XLVI: 951–957.
R.M.King, 2010. Regional business development policy in Central and Eastern Europe: A mechanism design perspective. Review of Economic Design 14: 221–242.
Y.Klochko,, and N.Issakova. 1996. Small business sector in Ukrainian transition economy: Achievements to date. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 8 (2): 127–140.
L.D.Kuchma, 2002. Message of the president of Ukraine: European choice, conceptual framework of the strategy of economic and social development of Ukraine in 2002–2011. Kyiv: Administration of the President of Ukraine.
T.Kuzio, 2014. Crime, politics and business in 1990s Ukraine. Communist and Post-Communist Studies 47 (2): 195–210.
T.Kuznetsova, 1991. The growth of cooperatives in the Soviet Union. In In search of flexibility: The new Soviet labour market, ed. G.Standing 277–294. Geneva: International Labour Office.
V.Lanovyi, 2013. Derzhava proty biznesmeniv i hromadian [The state is against businessmen and citizens]. http://www.epravda.com.ua/publications/2013/11/20/404375/.
Law on Cooperation. 2003. Ofitsiynyi Visnyk Ukrainy, 2003, No. 33, p. 233.
Law on Cooperation in the USSR. 1988. (Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR, 1988, No. 22, p. 355).
Law on Enterprises in the USSR. 1990. (Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR, 1990). http://zakon4.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/v1529400-90.
Law on Individual Labour Activity. 1996. (Vedomosti Verkhovnogo Soveta SSSR, 1996, No. 47, p. 964).
Law on State Support for Small Entrepreneurship. 2000. (Ofitsiynyi Visnyk Ukrainy, 2000, No. 46, p. 22).
Law on the National Programme for Support of Development of Small Entrepreneurship. 2000. (Ofitsiynyi Visnyk Ukrainy, 2001, No. 4, p. 1).
J.Lindner,, and B.Rittberger. 2003. The creation, interpretation and contestation of institutions—Revisiting historical institutionalism. Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (3): 445–473.
J.Mahoney, 2001. Path-dependent explanations of regime change: Central America in comparative perspective. Studies in Comparative International Development 36 (1): 111–141.
T.S.Manolova,, R.V.Eunni, and B.S.Gyoshev. 2008. Institutional environment for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship. Theory and Practice 781: 203–219.
J.McMillan,, and C.Woodruff. 2002. The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives 16 (3): 153–170.
N.Mikhalchenko,, and V.Andrushchenko. 2012. Ukraina razdelennaya v sebe: Ot leonidii k viktorii [Ukraine splitted in itself: From leonidia to victoria] 2nd ed. Kyiv: I.F. Kuras Institute of Political and Ethnonational Studies.
M.Minniti, 2008. The role of government policy on entrepreneurial activity: Productive, unprodactive, or destructive? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice1 32 (5): 779–790.
D.C.North, 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
D.M.Nuti, 1991. The role of new cooperatives in the Soviet economy. In G.Standing ed. In search of flexibility: The new Soviet labour market. Geneva: International Labour Office, pp. 295–318.
OECD et al. 2012. SME policy index: Eastern partner countries 2012: Progress in implementation of Small Business Act for Europe. OECD Publishing.
P.Pierson, 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.
K.Plokker, 1990. The development of individual and cooperative labour activity in the Soviet Union. Soviet Studies: A Quarterly Review of the Social and Economic Institutions of the USSR 42 (3): 403–428.
M.Prado,, and M.Trebilcock, 2009. Path dependence, development, and the dynamics of institutional reform. University of Toronto Law Journal 59 (3): 341–380.
G.Roland, 2004. Understanding institutional change: Fast-moving and slow-moving institutions. Studies in Comparative International Development 38: 109–131.
W.R.Scott, 1995. Innovation and institutions. SAGE Publications.
D.Slider, 1991. Embattled entrepreneurs: Soviet cooperatives in an unreformed economy. Europe-Asia Studies 43 (5): 797–821.
D.Smallbone,. 2010. Government and entrepreneurship in transition economies: The case of small firms in business services in Ukraine. Service Industries Journal 30 (5): 655–670.
D.Smallbone,, and F.Welter, 2012. Entrepreneurship and institutional change in transition economies: The Commonwealth of Independent States, Central and Eastern Europe and China compared. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 24 (3–4): 215–233.
D.Smallbone,, and F.Welter, 2008. Entrepreneurship and small business development in post-socialist economies. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
D.Smallbone,, and F.Welter, 2001. The role of government in SME development in transition economies. International Small Business Journal 19 (4): 63–77.
K.Soldak, 2012. Ukraine: Corrupt and stoic. http://www.forbes.com/sites/katyasoldak/2012/12/31/ukraine-corrupt-and-stoic/.
State Statistics Service of Ukraine. 2013. Statistical yearbook of Ukraine 2012. Kyiv.
S.Steinmo, 2008. What is historical institutionalism? Sven Steinmo. In Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective, ed. D.Dela Porta and M.Keating 118–138. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
R.Sturm,, M.M.Muller, and J.Dieringer. 2000. Economic transformation in Central and Eastern Europe: Towards a new regulatory regime? Journal of European Public Policy 7 (4): 650–662.
D.R.Thomas, 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation 27 (2): 237–246.
F.Welter,, and D.Smallbone, 2011. Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behavior in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management 49 (1): 107–125.
C.C.Williams,, S.Nadin,, and P.Rodgers, 2012. Evaluating competing theories of informal entrepreneurship: Some lessons from Ukraine. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research 18 (5): 528–543.
World Bank Group. 2013. Doing business: Measuring business regulations. http://www.doingbusiness.org/.
Similar publications
Sorry the service is unavailable at the moment. Please try again later.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.