Article (Scientific journals)
Comparative analysis of cancer vaccine settings for the selection of an effective protocol in mice.
Conteduca, Giuseppina
2013In Journal of Translational Medicine, 12 (11)
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
 

Files


Full Text
1479-5876-11-120 (1).pdf
Publisher postprint (921.91 kB)
Download

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.

Send to



Details



Keywords :
TIL; DC; vaccination
Abstract :
[en] Background: Cancer vaccines are considered a promising therapeutic approach. However, their clinical results are not yet satisfactory. This may be due to the the difficulty of selection of an efficient tumor associated antigen (TAA) and immunization protocol. Indeed, the weak antigenicity of many TAA impairs the design of robust procedures, therefore a systematic analysis to identify the most efficient TAA is mandatory. Here, we performed a study to compare different gp100 vaccination strategies to identify the best strategy to provide a 100% protection against experimental melanoma in a reproducible manner. Methods: C57BL/6J mice were challenged subcutaneously with B16F10 melanoma cells, after vaccination with: a) mouse or human gp10025-33 peptide plus CpG adjuvant; b) mouse or human gp100 gene; c) mouse or human gp10025-33 peptide-pulsed dendritic cells (DC). Alternatively, a neutralizing anti-IL-10 monoclonal antibody (mAb) was subcutaneously administered at the site of tumor challenge to counteract regulatory cells. Finally, combinatorial treatment was performed associating human gp10025-33 peptide-pulsed DC vaccination with administration of the anti-IL-10 mAb. Results: Vaccination with human gp10025-33 peptide-pulsed DC was the most effective immunization protocol, although not achieving a full protection. Administration of the anti-IL-10 mAb showed also a remarkable protective effect, replicated in mice challenged with a different tumor, Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma. When immunization with gp10025-33 peptide-pulsed DC was associated with IL-10 counteraction, a 100% protective effect was consistently achieved. The analysis on the T-cell tumor infiltrates showed an increase of CD4+granzyme+ T-cells and a decreased number of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ Treg elements from mice treated with either gp10025-33 peptide-pulsed DC vaccination or anti-IL-10 mAb administration. These data suggest that processes of intratumoral re-balance between effector and regulatory T cell subpopulations may play a critical protective role in immunotherapy protocols. Conclusions: Here we demonstrate that, in the setting of a cancer vaccine strategy, a comparative analysis of different personalized approaches may favour the unveiling of the most effective protocol. Moreover, our findings suggest that counteraction of IL-10 activity may be critical to revert the intratumoral environment promoting Treg polarization, thus increasing the effects of a vaccination against selected TAA.
Disciplines :
Immunology & infectious disease
Author, co-author :
Conteduca, Giuseppina ;  Università degli studi di Genova,Italy > CEBR > Immunology > 2013
Language :
English
Title :
Comparative analysis of cancer vaccine settings for the selection of an effective protocol in mice.
Publication date :
May 2013
Journal title :
Journal of Translational Medicine
eISSN :
1479-5876
Publisher :
BioMed Central
Volume :
12
Issue :
11
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Name of the research project :
“Immunoterapia anti-tumorale: analisi d’efficacia dei principali protocolli tradizionali d’immunizzazione e validazione dell’efficacia terapeutica dell’inibizione dell’interleuchina 10 nel trattamento del melanoma
Funders :
San Paolo company, MIUR
Available on ORBi :
since 27 March 2015

Statistics


Number of views
63 (2 by ULiège)
Number of downloads
61 (0 by ULiège)

Scopus citations®
 
21
Scopus citations®
without self-citations
18
OpenCitations
 
16

Bibliography


Similar publications



Contact ORBi