Reference : The utility of Google Scholar when searching geographical literature: comparison with...
Scientific journals : Article
Social & behavioral sciences, psychology : Library & information sciences
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/178974
The utility of Google Scholar when searching geographical literature: comparison with three commercial bibliographic databases
English
Stirbu, Simona mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > > Bibliothèque des Sciences et Techniques >]
Thirion, Paul mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > > Réseau des Bibliothèques : Direction générale >]
Schmitz, Serge mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de géographie > Service de géographie rurale (LAPLEC) >]
Haesbroeck, Gentiane mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de mathématique > Statistique mathématique >]
Greco, Ninfa mailto [Université de Liège - ULiège > > Bibliothèque des Sciences et Techniques >]
13-May-2015
Journal of Academic Librarianship
Elsevier Science
41
3
322-329
Yes (verified by ORBi)
International
0099-1333
[en] bibliographic database analysis ; geographical literature ; Google Scholar ; Web of Science ; FRANCIS ; GeoRef
[en] This study aims to highlight what benefits, if any, Google Scholar (GS) has for academic literature searches in the field of geography, compared to three commercial bibliographic databases: Web of Science (WoS) and FRANCIS (multidisciplinary databases) and GeoRef (specialized in geosciences). To ensure a valid comparison, identical bibliographic searches were applied using each of the four bibliographic tools. To exclude automatic variations of the ten keywords tested, they were placed between quotation marks and searched only in the “title” field of the respective search tools’ interfaces. The results were limited to bibliographic references published from 2005 to 2009. In order to assess the repeatability of the results, the exact same process was repeated monthly between November 2010 and July 2011. Initially the whole set of results was analyzed, after which the search results for two keywords (selected since they yielded a manageable number of results) were studied in more detail. The results indicate that GS search results show a large degree of overlap with those of the other databases but, moreover, yield numerous unique hits, which should be useful to researchers in both the fields of human and physical geography. GS leads the other tools widely on number of results, independently of keyword, subfield, year of publication, or time of search.
Researchers ; Professionals ; Students
http://hdl.handle.net/2268/178974
10.1016/j.acalib.2015.02.013
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0099133315000178

File(s) associated to this reference

Fulltext file(s):

FileCommentaryVersionSizeAccess
Open access
Article-Stirbu&All.pdfAuthor postprint1.13 MBView/Open

Bookmark and Share SFX Query

All documents in ORBi are protected by a user license.