Monitoring of clinical activities and performances by using international classifications ICD-10 and ICPC-2: Three years experience of the Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Rwanda
ICD-10; ICPC-2; 3BT; monitoring; in-hospital mortality load; length of stay load; case load
Abstract :
[en] Measuring performances of health professionals and health facilities is a difficult task. However,
with the appropriate information management tools, a lot of useful information can be collected
from routine data registration activities.
Situated in the capital of Rwanda, the Central Kigali University Teaching Hospital developed in
January 2006 its electronic patient record using both ICD10 and ICPC2 codes for the structured
registration of diseases and procedures. In order to enable synoptic data analysis, individual codes
have been grouped into a set of 174 disease groups (KHIRI Pathology Group Set –KPGS). To
assess the activities and performances of the different clinical departments, outcome data were
analyzed following a number of essential criteria: the caseload, the LOS (length of stay) load and
the in-hospital mortality load.
A total number of 27784 patients were admitted during the study period. On the 27784 patients a
total of respectively 30609 and 29447 diagnoses were recorded in ICPC2 and ICD10. The total of
hospitalization days was 395256. 2759 patients died over the 3 years study period. Four ICPC
classes covered more than 10% of the encodings each: A (general) 5649, D (digestive system) 6040,
L (locomotors system) 3297 and R (respiratory system) counted for 4026 registrations. Comparable
results could be obtained in the corresponding ICD classes A+B, K, M+S-T and J.
Linking ICD10 and ICPC2 codes to global patient data clearly enables the physicians and the hospital
management to produce comparable, standardized and internationally valuable evaluations of
the hospital activities and trends. It also opens the perspective of fixing objective priorities in patient management and provides an interesting starting point for comparing health professionals’
clinical performances in a standardized way.
Disciplines :
General & internal medicine
Author, co-author :
Hategekimana, Theobald
Tran Ngoc, Candide
Porignon, Denis ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences de la santé publique > Santé publique : aspects spécifiques
De Jonghe, Michel
Verbeke, Frank
Van Bastelaere, Stefan
Language :
English
Title :
Monitoring of clinical activities and performances by using international classifications ICD-10 and ICPC-2: Three years experience of the Kigali University Teaching Hospital, Rwanda
Publication date :
2010
Journal title :
electronic Journal of Health Informatics
eISSN :
1446-4381
Publisher :
Health Informatics, Central Queensland University, Australia
Rowe AK, de Savigny D, Lanata CF, Victora CG. How can we achieve and maintain high-quality performance of health workers in low-resource settings? Lancet 2005 Sep 17;366(9490):1026-35.
Naveh E, Stem Z. How quality improvement programs can affect general hospital performance. Int J Health Care Qual Assur Inc Leadersh Health Serv 2005;18(4-5):249-70.
Agyepong IA, Anafi P, Asiamah E, Ansah EK, Ashon DA, Narh-Dometey C. Health worker (internal customer) satisfaction and motivation in the public sector in Ghana. Int J Health Plann Manage 2004 Oct;19(4):319-36.
Jiang HJ, Friedman B, Begun JW. Sustaining and improving hospital performance: The effects of organizational and market factors. Health Care Manage Rev 2006 Jul;31(3):188-96.
Kamadjeu RM, Tapang EM, Moluh RN. Designing and implementing an electronic health record system in primary care practice in sub-Saharan Africa: a case study from Cameroon. Inform Prim Care 2005;13(3):179-86.
Portelli R, Brosi J, Collopy B. Matching ICD-9-CM codes to clinical indicators--is it the way to go? Health Inf Manag 1997 Dec 19;27(4):168-70.
Osler TM, Cohen M, Rogers FB, Camp L, Rutledge R, Shackford SR. Trauma registry injury coding is superfluous: a comparison of outcome prediction based on trauma registry International Classification of Diseases-Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and hospital information system ICD-9 codes. J Trauma 1997 Aug;43(2):253-6.
Wonca International Classiffication Committee. ICPC-2: International Classification of Primary Care (2e). Oxford University Press; 1998.
de Lusignan S, van Weel C. The use of routinely collected computer data for resaerch in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Family Practice 2006;23:253-63.
Britt H, Beaton N, Miller G. General practice medical records: why code? Why classify? Australian Family Physician 1995;24:612-5.
Okkes I, Jamoulle M, Lamberts H, Bentzen N. ICPC-2-E: the electronic version of ICPC-2. Differences from the printed version and the consequences. Fam Pract 2000 Apr;17(2):101-7.
Rodgers RP, Sherwin Z, Lamberts H, Okkes IM. ICPC Multilingual Collaboratory: a Web- and Unicode-based system for distributed editing/translating/viewing of the multilingual International Classification of Primary Care. Medinfo 2004;11(Pt 1):425-9.
Rwanda 2005: results from the demographic and health survey. Stud Fam Plann 2008 Jun;39(2):147-52.
De Jonghe M, Jamoulle M, Porignon D. Utilisation et évaluation du thésaurus belge 3BT adapté au Rwanda. Rev Méd Brux 2006;27:274-8.
World Health Organization. World health Statistics 2008. Geneva.; 2009.
Logie DE, Rowson M, Ndagije F. Innovations in Rwanda's health system: looking to the future. Lancet 2008 Jul 19;372(9634):256-61.