[en] Cubicle housing offers a good compromise between the needs of the animals and those of the breeders; it is one of the main housing
systems for dairy cows. The recommendations relative to the design and management of cubicle housing are, however, always subject
to revision. Special attention is now being given to the improvement of animal comfort, particularly with regards to the lying cow. In
this context, the level of comfort is estimated by the duration of the lying time, the frequency of the lying bouts and the ease with
which cows are able to get up and lie down. The level of cow comfort is in direct relation to the softness of the floor, to the cubicle
dimensions, and to the design of the lateral and frontal partitions. A soft floor can be assured through the use of either multilayer
mattresses or a thick litter. Mattresses must be covered with a litter material that absorbs surface moisture and helps to ensure the
cleanliness of the stall and udder. To achieve these objectives, the nature of the litter material (straw, sawdust, sand, lime, etc.) appears
to be less important than the frequency of renewal. Cubicle floors covered with a thick layer (± 20 cm) of litter seem generally better
appreciated by the cows than those equipped with mattresses, and their use is associated with a lower frequency of leg injuries as well
as lameness. Sand appears to be a top-grade material for ensuring animal comfort. Nevertheless, the maintenance of a thick layer of
litter demands an extra daily labor requirement and the handling of sand as a litter material requires specific equipment. There is a
wide range of recommendations on cubicle dimensions due to differences in cow size and the need to take into account the cleanliness
of the floor. Lateral partitions must be evaluated for their effectiveness in constraining the animal from spilling out into the
neighboring cubicles while at the same time avoiding both injury and difficulties experienced by the cow in getting up and lying down.
Finally, frontal partitions must be evaluated regarding their effectiveness in providing sufficient space to allow the cow to thrust its
head forward as it stands up.
Disciplines :
Animal production & animal husbandry
Author, co-author :
Cazin, Pauline
Nicks, Baudouin ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de productions animales > Ecologie et éthologie vétérinaires
Dufrasne, Isabelle ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département de productions animales > Nutrition des animaux domestiques
Language :
French
Title :
Aménagement des logettes et confort des vaches laitières
Alternative titles :
[en] Cubicle design and the comfort of dairy cows
Publication date :
2014
Journal title :
INRA Productions Animales
ISSN :
2273-774X
eISSN :
2273-7766
Publisher :
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA), Castanet-Tolosan, France
Andreasen S.N., Forkman B., 2012. The welfare of dairy cows is improved in relation to cleanliness and integument alterations on the hocks and lameness when sand is used as stall surface. J. Dairy Sci., 95, 4961-4967.
Botreau R., Veissier I., Perny P., 2009. Overall assessment of animal welfare: strategy adopted in Welfare Quality®. Anim. Welfare, 18, 363-370.
Calamari L., Calegari F., Stefanini L., 2009. Effect of different free stall surfaces on behavioural, productive and metabolic parameters in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 120, 9-17.
CIGR, 1994. The design of dairy cow housing. Report of the CIGR section II Working group n°14 - cattle housing, Farm buildings research team. Winchester, Hampshire, UK: ADAS Bridgets Dairy Research Centre.
Coignard M., Guatteo R., Veissier I., de Boyer des Roches A., Mounier L., Lehébel A., Bareille N., 2013. Description and factors of variation of the overall health score in French dairy cattle herds using the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol. Prev. Vet. Med., 112, 296-308.
Cook N.B., 2009. Free-stall design for maximum cow comfort. WCDS Advances in Dairy Technology, 21, 255-268.
Cook N.B., Bennett T.B., Nordlund K.V., 2004. Effect of free stall surface on daily activity patterns in dairy cows with relevance to lameness prevalence. J. Dairy Sci., 87, 2912-2922.
Cook N.B., Bennett T.B., Nordlund K.V., 2005. Monitoring indices of cow comfort in free-stall housed dairy herds. J. Dairy Sci., 88, 3876-3885.
Cook N.B., Marin M.J., Mentink R.L., Bennett T.B., Schaefer M.J., 2008. Comfort zonedesign free stalls: do they influence the stall use behavior of lame cows? J. Dairy Sci., 91, 4673-4678.
Drissler M., Gaworski M., Tucker C.B., Weary D.M., 2005. Freestall maintenance: effects on lying behavior of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci., 88, 2381-2387.
Espejo L.A., Endres M.I., Salfer J.A., 2006. Prevalence of lameness in high-producing Holstein cows housed in freestall barns in Minnesota. J. Dairy Sci., 89, 3052-3058.
Ferrari P., Moscatelli G., 2009. Gestion du fumier, des conditions d'hygiène et des émissions de gaz à effet de serre dans les exploitations laitières par l'utilisation de fractions solides du lisier recyclées en litière pour vaches. In: Colloque Europ. Bâtiments d'élevage du futur, Lille, France, 133-140.
Fregonesi J.A., Von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Tucker C.B., Veira D.M., Weary D.M., 2009. Neck-rail position in the free stall affects standing behavior and udder and stall cleanliness. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 1974-1985.
Galindo F., Broom D.M., Jackson P.G.G., 2000. A note on possible link between behavior and the occurrence of lameness in dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 67, 335-341.
Haley D.B., Rushen J., De Passillé A.M., 2000. Behavioural indicators of cow comfort: activity and resting behaviour of dairy cows in two types of housing. Can. J. Anim. Sci., 80, 257-263.
Haley D.B., De Passillé A.M., Rushen J., 2001. Assessing cow comfort: effects of two floor types and two tie-stall design on the behaviour of lactating dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 71, 105-117.
Hulsen J., 2006, Signes de pieds: guide pratique pour des onglons en bonne santé. Roodbont éditions, Zutphen, Pays-Bas, 40p.
Husfeldt A.W., Endres M.I., 2012. Association between stall surface and some animal welfare measurements in freestall dairy herds using recycled manure solids for bedding. J. Dairy Sci., 95, 5626-5634.
Krohn C.C., Munksgaard L., 1993. Behaviour of dairy cows kept in extensive (loose housing/ pasture) or intensive (tie stall) environments II. Lying and lying-down behaviour. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 37, 1-16.
Kristula M.A., Dou Z., Toth J.D., Smith B.I., Harvey N., Sabo M., 2008. Evaluation of freestall mattress bedding treatments to reduce mastitis bacterial growth. J. Dairy Sci., 91, 1885-1892.
Lensink J., Mounier L., 2012. Les revêtements en caoutchouc dans les logettes et les couloirs de circulation en élevages bovins. Bulletin des GTV, 67, 93-100.
Lidfors L., 1989. The use of getting up and lying down movements in the evaluation of cattle environments. Vet. Res. Com., 13, 307-324.
Manninen E., De Passillé A.M., Rushen J., Norring M., Saloniemi H., 2002. Preferences of dairy cows kept in unheated building for different kind of cubicle flooring. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 75, 281-292.
Martens L., Daelemans J., Maton A., 1980. Les investissements dans les étables pour vaches laitières et leur équipement. Revue de l'Agriculture, 33, 433-450.
Metcalf J. A., Roberts S.J., Sutton J.D., 1992. Variations in blood flow to and from the bovine mammary gland measured using transit time ultra-sound and dye dilution. Res. Vet. Sci., 53, 59-63.
Milklait 2020, 2013. Manuel sur la litière pour les exploitations laitières du Nouveau- Brunswick, 61p. www.milk2020.ca/fr/dwn/FRENCHMANUALlr.pdf
Norring M., Manninen E., De Passillé A.M., Rushen J., Saloniemi H., 2008. Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 91, 570-576.
Norring M., Manninen E., De Passillé A.M., Rushen J., Saloniemi H., 2010. Preferences of dairy cows for three stall surface materials with small amounts of bedding. J. Dairy Sci., 93, 70-74.
Rulquin H., Caudal J.P., 1992. Effects of lying or standing on mammary blood flow and heart rate of dairy cows. Ann. Zoot., 41, 101.
Rushen J., Haley D., De Passillé A.M., 2007. Effect of softer flooring in tie stalls on resting behavior and leg injuries of lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci., 90, 3647-3651.
Ruud L.E., Boe K.E., Østeras O., 2010. Associations of soft flooring materials in free stalls with milk yield, clinical mastitis, teat lesions, and removal of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 93, 1578-1586.
Scharde S., Zähner M., 2008. Litières dans les logettes pour vaches laitières - compost et fraction solide issue de la séparation du lisier: une alternative. In: Rapport ART, n° 699.
Séité Y., Guiocheau S., Gautier B., Foisnon O., Coutant S., Prudhomme J.F., Capdeville J., Ménard J.L., Charlery J., 2012. Concevoir et installer des logettes. Institut de l'élevage (Ed), 12p.
The Dairy Group, 2012. Dairy cow housing - Report August 12, 146p. www.dairyco.org.uk/ non_umbraco/download.aspx?media=13205
Tucker C.B., Weary D.M., Fraser D., 2003. Effects of three types of free-stall surfaces on preferences and stall usage by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 86, 521-529.
Tucker C.B., Weary D.M., 2004. Bedding on geotextile mattresses: how much is needed to improve cow comfort? J. Dairy Sci., 87, 2889- 2895.
Tucker C.B., Weary D.M., Fraser D., 2005. Influence of neck-rail placement on free-stall preference, use, and cleanliness. J. Dairy Sci., 88, 2730-3737.
Tucker C.B., Weary D.M., Von Keyserlingk M.A.G., Beauchemin K.A., 2009. Cow comfort in tie-stall: increased depth of shavings or straw bedding increases lying time. J. Dairy Sci., 92, 2684-2690.
Veissier I., Capdeville J., Delval E., 2004. Cubicle housing system for cattle: comfort of dairy cows depends on cubicle adjustment. J. Anim. Sci., 82, 3321-3337.
Veissier I., Botreau R., Perny P., 2010. Evaluation multicritère appliquée au bien-être des animaux en ferme ou à l'abattoir: difficultés et solutions du projet Welfare Quality®. INRA Prod. Anim., 23, 269-284.
Vin H., Vin-Dekoker J., 2007. Logement et infection mammaire. In: JNGTV, Nantes, France, 245-253.
Weary D.M., Taszkun I., 2000. Hock lesions and free-stall design. J. Dairy Sci., 83, 697-702.
Zdanowicz M., Shelford J.A., Tucker C.B., Weary D.M., Von Keyserlingk M.A.G., 2004. Bacterial populations on teat ends of dairy cows housed in free stalls and bedded with either sand or sawdust. J. Dairy Sci., 87, 1694-1701.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.