The impact of expertise on the capture of sketched intentions: perspectives for remote cooperative design

[en] The paper describes the way expertise and field-knowledge can impact the transfer of graphical intentions during architectural cooperative design. The analysis of 28 controlled experiments reveals what matters in transmitting architectural intents and more specifically underlines how novices’ intuitive, deductive processes based on previous and embodied experiences interestingly complement experts’ knowledge of the architectural field and its semantics. The results directly inform how we, as researchers, designers and engineers, should take advantage of both novices’ and experts’ strategies to develop tools, methods or interfaces to support next generation cooperative design.

Disciplines :

Architecture

Author, co-author :

Sutera, Jennifer

Yang, Maria C.

Elsen, Catherine ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département Argenco : Secteur A&U > Composition architecturale

Language :

English

Title :

The impact of expertise on the capture of sketched intentions: perspectives for remote cooperative design

Publication date :

2014

Journal title :

Lecture Notes in Computer Science

ISSN :

0302-9743

eISSN :

1611-3349

Publisher :

Springer, Berlin, Germany

Volume :

8683

Pages :

245-252

Peer reviewed :

Peer reviewed

Available on ORBi :

since 25 July 2014

Statistics

Number of views

109 (7 by ULiège)

Number of downloads

237 (2 by ULiège)

More statistics

Scopus citations^®

Scopus citations^®
without self-citations

OpenCitations

OpenAlex citations

Bibliography

Schön, D.A., Wiggins, G.: Kinds of Seeing and their Functions in Designing. Design Studies 13(2), 135–156 (1992)
Dogan, F., Nersessian, N.J.: Generic abstraction in design creativity: the case of Staatsgalerie by James Stirling. Design Studies 31, 207–236 (2010)
Dorta, T., Kalay, Y., Pérez, E., Lesage, A.-M.: Comparing immersion in remote and local collaborative ideation through sketches: a case study. In: CAAD Futures, Proceedings (2011)
Elsen, C., Demaret, J.-N., Yang, M.-C., Leclercq, P.: Sketch-Based Interfaces for Modeling and Users’ Needs: Redefining Connections. AIEDAM 26(3) (2012)
Jones, J.C.: Design methods: Seeds of human futures. John Wiley, Chichester (1970)
Norman, D.A., Verganti, R.: Incremental and radical innovation: design research versus technology and meaning change. Submitted to Design Issues (2012)
Baker, M., Détienne, F., Burkhardt, J.-M.: Quality of collaboration in design: articulating multiple dimensions and viewpoints. In: 1st Interdisciplinary Innovation Conference, Telecom ParisTech. (2013)
Darses, F.: Résolution collective des problèmes de conception. Le Travail Humain 72, 43–59 (2009)
Safin, S., Juchmes, R., Leclercq, P.: Use of graphical modality in a collaborative design distant setting. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation (suppl.1) (2012)
Elsen, C., Darses, F., Leclercq, P.: What Do Strokes Teach Us about Collaborative Design? In: Luo, Y. (ed.) CDVE 2012. LNCS, vol. 7467, pp. 114–125 . Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Dessy, J.: De l’emploi des symboles dans les esquisses architecturales. Thesis, Université de Liège (2002)
Van Someren, M., Barnard, Y., Sandberg, J.: The Think Aloud Method: A Practical Guide to Modelling Cognitive Processes. Academic Press, London (1994)
Kavakli, M., Gero, J.S.: The Structure of Concurrent Cognitive Actions: a Case Study on Novice and Expert Designers. Design Studies 23(1), 25–40 (2001)
Hattenhauer, D.: The Rhetoric of Architecture: a Semiotic Approach. Communication Quarterly 32, 71–77 (1984)
Eco, U.: Function and Sign: the Semiotics of Architecture. In: Signs, Symbols and Architecture, pp. 11–69 (1980)