[en] Exaggerated test conditions were frequently used to investigate the cutaneous tolerance of detergent products in the past. As the sensitivity of newly designed biometric methods is steadily improving, the trend towards more realistic test conditions should be encouraged. A hand immersion test under laboratory-controlled usage conditions is presently described, fulfilling such principles. Panelists soaked their hands in 2 different hand dishwashing liquids, 2x daily for 10 min each (with successive in-solution/out-of-solution cycles) for 4 consecutive days. Products were at usual dilution for dishwashing liquids and were randomized between the dominant and non-dominant hands of panelists. Visual scoring of erythema and dryness developing on the whole hands (scoring scales including interdigital areas and joints) during the week did not allow discrimination between the 2 products. However the dominant hands were significantly more susceptible to alterations than the non-dominant hands, regardless of product attribution. In contrast, skin electrical measurements (Corneometer CM800 and Skicon 200) on the dorsum of the hands (muscle mass between thumb and index) and squamometry analysis of tape stripping (harvested from the same site) yielded significant differences between the 2 products. In conclusion, a hand immersion test under realistic conditions has been described, which discriminates between products when sensitive assessment methods are used to explore skin sites partially protected from daily-life skin aggressions.
Disciplines :
Dermatology
Author, co-author :
Paye, Marc ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Relations académiques et scientifiques (Médecine)
Gomes, G.
Zerweck, C. R.
Pierard, Gérald ; Université de Liège - ULiège > Département des sciences cliniques > Dermatopathologie
Grove, G. L.
Language :
English
Title :
A Hand Immersion Test under Laboratory-Controlled Usage Conditions: The Need for Sensitive and Controlled Assessment Methods
scite shows how a scientific paper has been cited by providing the context of the citation, a classification describing whether it supports, mentions, or contrasts the cited claim, and a label indicating in which section the citation was made.
Bibliography
Frosch P J, Kligman A M. The soap chamber test. A new method for assessing the irritancy of soaps. J Am Acad Dermatol 1979: 1: 35-41.
Simion F A, Rhein L D, Grove G L, Wojtkowski J M, Cagan R H, Scala D D. Sequential order of skin responses to surfactants during a soap chamber test. Contact Dermatitis 1991: 25: 242-249.
Vilaplana J, Mascaro J M, Trullas C, Coll J, Romaguera C, Zemba C, Pelejero C. Human irritant response to different qualities and concentrations of cocoamidopropylbetaines. A possible model of paradoxical irritant response. Contact Dermatitis 1992: 26: 289-294.
Lanman B M, Elvers E B, Howard C J. The rôle of human patch testing in a product development program. Joint Conf on Cosmetic science. The Toilet Goods Assoc. (currently CTFA), Washington DC, 1968: 21-23.
Dillarstone A, Paye M. Classification of surfactant-containing products as 'skin irritants'. Contact Dermatitis 1994: 30: 314.
York M, Griffiths H A, Whittle E, Basketter D A. Evaluation of a human patch test for the identification of skin irritation potential. Contact Dermatitis 1996: 34: 204-212.
Dillarstone A, Paye M. Antagonism in concentrated surfactant systems. Contact Dermatitis 1993: 28: 198.
Sharko P T, Murahata R I, Leyden J J, Grove G L. Arm wash evaluation with instrumental evaluation. A sensitive technique for differentiating the irritation potential of personal washing products. J Dermal Clin Eval Soc 1992: 43: 187-192.
Strube D D, Koontz S W, Murahata R I, Theiler R F. The flex wash test: a method for evaluating the mildness of personal washing products. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1989: 40: 297-306.
Charbonnier V, Morrison Jr B M, Paye M, Maibach H I. Open application assay in investigation of subclinical irritant dermatitis induced by sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) in man: advantage of squamometry. Skin Res Technol 1998: 4: 244-250.
Clarys P, Manou I, Barel A O. Influence of temperature on irritation in the hand/forearm immersion test. Contact Dermatitis 1997: 36: 240-245.
Piérard G E, Piérard-Franchimont C, Saint-Léger D, Kligman A M. Squamometry: the assessment of xerosis by colorimetry of D-squame adhesive discs. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1992: 40: 297-305.
Paye M, Morrison Jr B M. Non visible skin irritation. Proceedings of the CESIO, Barcelona, Spain, 1996: 3: 42-51.
Morrison Jr B M, Paye M, Charbonnier V, Maibach H I. Demonstrating invisible (subclinical) sodium lauryl sulfate irritation with squamometry. Am. Acad Dermatol Meeting, Orlando, 27 Feb-4 Mar, 1998: P098.
Piérard G E, Masson P, Rodrigues L, Berardesca E, Lévêque J L, Loden M, Rogiers V, Sauermann G, Serup J. EEMCO guidance to the assessment of dry skin (xerosis) and ichtyosis: evaluation by stratum corneum strippings. Skin Res Technol 1996: 2: 3-11.
Piérard G E, Goffin V, Piérard-Franchimont C. Squamometry and corneosurfametry for rating interactions of cleansing products with stratum corneum. J Soc Cosmet Chem 1994: 45: 269-277.
Paye M, Cartiaux Y. Squamometry: a tool to move from exaggerated to more and more realistic application conditions for comparing the skin compatibility of surfactant-based products, Intl J Cosmet Sci 1998: in press.
Barel A O, Clarys P. In vitro calibration of the capacitance method (Corneometer CM825) and conductance method (Skicon-200) for the evaluation of the hydration state of the skin. Skin Res Technol 1997: 3: 107-113.
Wilhelm K-P. Possible pitfalls in hydration measurements. In: Measuring hydration of the skin. A practical workshop. 11th Intl Symp Bioeng Skin, 2-5 Oct, 1996, Zurich, Switzerland.
Morrison Jr B M, Scala D D. Comparison of instrumental measurements of skin hydration. J Toxicol-Cut & Ocular Toxicol 1996: 15: 305-314.
Paye M, Dalimier Ch, Cartiaux Y, Chabassol C. Consumer perception of sensitive hands: what is behind? Skin Res Technol 1998: in press.
Walker A, Basketter D A, Baverel M, Diembeck W, Matthies W, Mougin D, Paye M, Rothlisberger R, Dupuis J. Test guidelines for assessment of skin compatibility of cosmetic finished products in man. Food Chem Toxicol 1996: 34: 651-660.
This website uses cookies to improve user experience. Read more
Save & Close
Accept all
Decline all
Show detailsHide details
Cookie declaration
About cookies
Strictly necessary
Performance
Strictly necessary cookies allow core website functionality such as user login and account management. The website cannot be used properly without strictly necessary cookies.
This cookie is used by Cookie-Script.com service to remember visitor cookie consent preferences. It is necessary for Cookie-Script.com cookie banner to work properly.
Performance cookies are used to see how visitors use the website, eg. analytics cookies. Those cookies cannot be used to directly identify a certain visitor.
Used to store the attribution information, the referrer initially used to visit the website
Cookies are small text files that are placed on your computer by websites that you visit. Websites use cookies to help users navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. Cookies that are required for the website to operate properly are allowed to be set without your permission. All other cookies need to be approved before they can be set in the browser.
You can change your consent to cookie usage at any time on our Privacy Policy page.