[en] Bone is able to react to changing mechanical demands by adapting its internal microstructure through bone forming and resorbing cells. This process is called bone modeling and remodeling. It is evident that changes in mechanical demands at the organ level must be interpreted at the tissue level where bone (re) modeling takes place. Although assumed for a long time, the relationship between the locations of bone formation and resorption and the local mechanical environment is still under debate. The lack of suitable imaging modalities for measuring bone formation and resorption in vivo has made it difficult to assess the mechanoregulation of bone three-dimensionally by experiment. Using in vivo micro-computed tomography and high resolution finite element analysis in living mice, we show that bone formation most likely occurs at sites of high local mechanical strain (p<0.0001) and resorption at sites of low local mechanical strain (p<0.0001). Furthermore, the probability of bone resorption decreases exponentially with increasing mechanical stimulus (R-2 = 0.99) whereas the probability of bone formation follows an exponential growth function to a maximum value (R-2 = 0.99). Moreover, resorption is more strictly controlled than formation in loaded animals, and ovariectomy increases the amount of non-targeted resorption. Our experimental assessment of mechanoregulation at the tissue level does not show any evidence of a lazy zone and suggests that around 80% of all (re) modeling can be linked to the mechanical microenvironment. These findings disclose how mechanical stimuli at the tissue level contribute to the regulation of bone adaptation at the organ level.
Disciplines :
Physical, chemical, mathematical & earth Sciences: Multidisciplinary, general & others
Local Mechanical Stimuli Regulate Bone Formation and Resorption in Mice at the Tissue Level
Publication date :
2013
Journal title :
PLoS ONE
eISSN :
1932-6203
Publisher :
Public Library Science, San Francisco, United States - California
Volume :
8
Issue :
4
Pages :
e62172-12
Peer reviewed :
Peer Reviewed verified by ORBi
Funders :
European Union for the osteoporotic virtual physiological human project (VPHOP) [FP7-ICT2008-223865]
Commentary :
Funding from the European Union for the osteoporotic virtual physiological human project (VPHOP FP7-ICT2008-223865) is gratefully acknowledged. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Frost HM, (1987) The mechanostat: a proposed pathogenic mechanism of osteoporoses and the bone mass effects of mechanical and nonmechanical agents. Bone Miner 2: 73-85.
Turner CH, Akhter MP, Raab DM, Kimmel DB, Recker RR, (1991) A noninvasive, in vivo model for studying strain adaptive bone modeling. Bone 12: 73-79.
Frost HM, (2003) Bone's mechanostat: a 2003 update. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol 275: 1081-1101.
Robling AG, Castillo AB, Turner CH, (2006) Biomechanical and molecular regulation of bone remodeling. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 8: 455-498.
Wolff J (1892) Das Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen (The Law of Bone Remodelling). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
Roux W (1881) Der Kampf der Theile im Organismus. Leipzig: Wilhelm Engelman.
Lanyon LE, (1973) Analysis of surface bone strain in the calcaneus of sheep during normal locomotion. Strain analysis of the calcaneus. J Biomech 6: 41-49.
Lanyon LE, (1992) Control of Bone Architecture by Functional Load Bearing. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 7: S369-S375.
Bikle DD, Sakata T, Halloran BP, (2003) The impact of skeletal unloading on bone formation. Gravit Space Biol Bull 16: 45-54.
De Souza RL, Matsuura M, Eckstein F, Rawlinson SCF, Lanyon LE, et al. (2005) Non-invasive axial loading of mouse tibiae increases cortical bone formation and modifies trabecular organization: A new model to study cortical and cancellous compartments in a single loaded element. Bone 37: 810-818.
Webster DJ, Morley PL, van Lenthe GH, Müller R, (2008) A novel in vivo mouse model for mechanically stimulated bone adaptation- a combined experimental and computational validation study. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 11: 435-441.
Webster D, Wasserman E, Ehrbar M, Weber F, Bab I, et al. (2010) Mechanical loading of mouse caudal vertebrae increases trabecular and cortical bone mass-dependence on dose and genotype. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 9: 737-747.
Basso N, Jia YH, Bellows CG, Heersche JNM, (2005) The effect of reloading on bone volume, osteoblast number, and osteoprogenitor characteristics: Studies in hind limb unloaded rats. Bone 37: 370-378.
Fritton JC, Myers ER, Wright TM, van der Meulen MCH, (2005) Loading induces site-specific increases in mineral content assessed by microcomputed tomography of the mouse tibia. Bone 36: 1030-1038.
Lambers FM, Schulte FA, Kuhn G, Webster DJ, Müller R, (2011) Mouse tail vertebrae adapt to cyclic mechanical loading by increasing bone formation rate and decreasing bone resorption rate as shown by time-lapsed in vivo imaging of dynamic bone morphometry. Bone 49: 1340-1350.
Huiskes R, Ruimerman R, van Lenthe GH, Janssen JD, (2000) Effects of mechanical forces on maintenance and adaptation of form in trabecular bone. Nature 405: 704-706.
Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Kanis JA, Malluche H, et al. (1987) Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols, and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Nomenclature Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2: 595-610.
Kim CH, Takai E, Zhou H, von Stechow D, Müller R, et al. (2003) Trabecular bone response to mechanical and parathyroid hormone stimulation: the role of mechanical microenvironment. J Bone Miner Res 18: 2116-2125.
Adachi T, Tsubota K, Tomita Y, Hollister SJ, (2001) Trabecular surface remodeling simulation for cancellous bone using microstructural voxel finite element models. J Biomech Eng 123: 403-409.
Ruimerman R, Hilbers P, van Rietbergen B, Huiskes R, (2005) A theoretical framework for strain-related trabecular bone maintenance and adaptation. J Biomech 38: 931-941.
Dunlop JW, Hartmann MA, Brechet YJ, Fratzl P, Weinkamer R, (2009) New suggestions for the mechanical control of bone remodeling. Calcif Tissue Int 85: 45-54.
Schulte FA, Zwahlen A, Lambers FM, Kuhn G, Ruffoni D, et al. (2013) Strain-adaptive in silico modeling of bone adaptation- A computer simulation validated by in vivo micro-computed tomography data. Bone 52: 485-492.
Chambers TJ, Evans M, Gardner TN, Turner-Smith A, Chow JW, (1993) Induction of bone formation in rat tail vertebrae by mechanical loading. Bone Miner 20: 167-178.
Schulte FA, Lambers FM, Kuhn G, Müller R, (2011) In vivo micro-computed tomography allows direct three-dimensional quantification of both bone formation and bone resorption parameters using time-lapsed imaging. Bone 48: 433-442.
Schulte FA, Lambers FM, Mueller TL, Stauber M, Müller R (2012) Image interpolation allows accurate quantitative bone morphometry in registered micro-computed tomography scans. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin.
Lambers FM, Kuhn G, Schulte FA, Koch K, Müller R, (2011) Longitudinal assessment of in vivo bone dynamics in a mouse tail model of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 90: 108-119.
Thevenaz P, Ruttimann UE, Unser M, (1998) A pyramid approach to subpixel registration based on intensity. IEEE Trans Image Process 7: 27-41.
Bouxsein ML, Boyd SK, Christiansen BA, Guldberg RE, Jepsen KJ, et al. (2010) Guidelines for assessment of bone microstructure in rodents using micro-computed tomography. J Bone Miner Res 25: 1468-1486.
Arbenz P, van Lenthe GH, Mennel U, Müller R, Sala M, (2008) A scalable multi-level preconditioner for matrix-free μ-finite element analysis of human bone structures. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 73: 927-947.
Huiskes R, (2000) If bone is the answer, then what is the question? J Anat 197 (Pt 2): 145-156.
Christen P, van Rietbergen B, Lambers FM, Müller R, Ito K, (2012) Bone morphology allows estimation of loading history in a murine model of bone adaptation. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 11: 483-492.
Beaupre GS, Orr TE, Carter DR, (1990) An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling-theoretical development. J Orthop Res 8: 651-661.
R Development Core Team (2007) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
Buie HR, Moore CP, Boyd SK, (2008) Postpubertal architectural developmental patterns differ between the L3 vertebra and proximal tibia in three inbred strains of mice. J Bone Miner Res 23: 2048-2059.
Willinghamm MD, Brodt MD, Lee KL, Stephens AL, Ye J, et al. (2010) Age-related changes in bone structure and strength in female and male BALB/c mice. Calcif Tissue Int 86: 470-483.
Lambers FM, Koch K, Kuhn G, Weigt C, Schulte F, et al. (2012) Bone structure and strength adapt to long-term cyclic overloading in an in vivo mouse model. J Biomech 45: S89.
Parfitt AM, (2002) Targeted and nontargeted bone remodeling: relationship to basic multicellular unit origination and progression. Bone 30: 5-7.
Gross TS, Srinivasan S, Liu CC, Clemens TL, Bain SD, (2002) Noninvasive loading of the murine tibia: an in vivo model for the study of mechanotransduction. J Bone Miner Res 17: 493-501.
Rubin CT, Lanyon LE, (1985) Regulation of bone mass by mechanical strain magnitude. Calcif Tissue Int 37: 411-417.
Gross TS, Edwards JL, McLeod KJ, Rubin CT, (1997) Strain gradients correlate with sites of periosteal bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 12: 982-988.
Sugiyama T, Meakin LB, Browne WJ, Galea GL, Price JS, et al. (2012) Bones' adaptive response to mechanical loading is essentially linear between the low strains associated with disuse and the high strains associated with the lamellar/woven bone transition. J Bone Miner Res 27: 1784-1793.
Ellman R, Spatz J, Cloutier A, Palme R, Christiansen B, et al. (2012) Partial reductions in mechanical loading yield proportional changes in bone density, bone architecture, and muscle mass. J Bone Miner Res.
Tsubota K, Adachi T, Tomita Y, (2002) Functional adaptation of cancellous bone in human proximal femur predicted by trabecular surface remodeling simulation toward uniform stress state. J Biomech 35: 1541-1551.
Weinkamer R, Hartmann MA, Brechet Y, Fratzl P, (2004) Stochastic lattice model for bone remodeling and aging. Phys Rev Lett 93: 228102.
Turner CH, Forwood MR, Rho JY, Yoshikawa T, (1994) Mechanical loading thresholds for lamellar and woven bone formation. J Bone Miner Res 9: 87-97.
Hsieh YF, Robling AG, Ambrosius WT, Burr DB, Turner CH, (2001) Mechanical loading of diaphyseal bone in vivo: the strain threshold for an osteogenic response varies with location. J Bone Miner Res 16: 2291-2297.
Cullen DM, Smith RT, Akhter MP, (2000) Time course for bone formation with long-term external mechanical loading. J Appl Physiol 88: 1943-1948.
Bonnelye E, Kung V, Laplace C, Galson DL, Aubin JE, (2002) Estrogen receptor-related receptor alpha impinges on the estrogen axis in bone: potential function in osteoporosis. Endocrinology 143: 3658-3670.
Zaman G, Jessop HL, Muzylak M, De Souza RL, Pitsillides AA, et al. (2006) Osteocytes use estrogen receptor alpha to respond to strain but their ERalpha content is regulated by estrogen. J Bone Miner Res 21: 1297-1306.
Windahl SH, Saxon L, Borjesson AE, Lagerquist MK, Frenkel B, et al. (2013) Estrogen receptor-alpha is required for the osteogenic response to mechanical loading in a ligand-independent manner involving its activation function 1 but not 2. J Bone Miner Res 28: 291-301.