Building Performance Simulation tools; architect-friendliness; usability; integration; building design; tools
Abstract :
[en] A wide range of scientifically validated Building Performance Simulation tools BPS is available internationally. The users of those tools are mainly researchers, physicists and experts who value empirical validation, analytical verification and calibration of uncertainty as defined by e.g. BESTEST. However, literature and comparative surveys indicate that most architects who use BPS tools in design practice are much more concerned with the (1) Usability and Information Management (UIM) of interface and (2) the Integration of Intelligent design Knowledge-Base (IIKB). Those two issues are the main factors for identifying a building simulation program as “Architect Friendly”. Now, with the advancement of BPS tools and the recent announcements of direct links between BIM or non-BIM modeling tools and BPS tools it is important to compare the existing programs. Based on an online survey, this paper presents the results of comparing ten major BPS tools. The following programs are compared: ECOTECT, HEED, Energy 10, Design Builder, eQUEST, DOE-2, Green Building Studio, IES VE, Energy Plus and Energy Plus-SketchUp Plugin (OpenStudio). With 249 valid responses, the survey ranked the tools in three classes and revealed that architects seek the IIKB above the UIM of the interface. Finally, the paper summarizes the key findings and underlines the major requirements for future improvement and development of BPS tools, mainly from an architectural perspective.
Disciplines :
Architecture
Author, co-author :
Attia, Shady ; Université Catholique de Louvain – UCL > Ecole Polytechnique de Louvain > Architecture et climat
Beltrán, Liliana; Texas A&M University > Department of Architecture
De Herde, André; Université Catholique de Louvain - UCL > Architecture et Climat
Hensen, Jan; Eindhoven University of Technology > Building Physics and Systems
Language :
English
Title :
“ARCHITECT FRIENDLY”: A COMPARISON OF TEN DIFFERENT BUILDING PERFORMANCE SIMULATION TOOLS
Publication date :
June 2009
Event name :
11th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference and Exhibition
Event organizer :
International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA)
Event place :
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Event date :
27-30 July 2009
Audience :
International
Main work title :
Proceedings of 11th International Building Performance Simulation Association Conference and Exhibition
Publisher :
International Building Performance Simulation Association (IBPSA), Glasgow, United Kingdom
Kusuda, T. Early history and future prospects of buildings system simulation. IBPSA. 1999. Japan.
Hensen J. Towards more effective use of building performance simulation in design. 7th International Conference on Design & Decision Support Systems in Architecture and Urban Planning. 2004 Eindhoven: TU/e.
Punjabi, S. and V. Miranda. Development of an integrated building design information interface. In IBPSA. 2005. Montreal, Canada.
Van Dijk, E. & P. Luscuere. An architect friendly interface for a dynamic building simulation program. in Sustainable Building. 2002. Norway.
Lam, K.P., N.H. Wong, and F. Henry. A study of the use of performance-based simulation tools for building design and evaluation in Singapore. In IBPSA. 1999. Kyoto, Japan.
Gratia, E. and A. De Herde, A simple design tool for the thermal study of an office building. Energy and Buildings, 2002. 34: p. 279-289.
Tianzhen, H., Z. Jinqian, and J. Yi, IISABRE: An Integrated Building Simulation Environment Building & Environment, 1997. 32(3): p. 219-224.
Hong, T., S.K. Chou, and T.Y. Bong, BS: an overview of developments & information sources. Building & Environment, 2000. 35: p. 347-361.
Crawley, D.B., et al., Contrasting the capabilities of building energy performance simulation programs. Building and Environment, 2008. 43(4): p. 661-673.
Reinhart, C. and A. Fitz, Findings from a Survey on the current use of daylight simulations during building design. Energy & Buildings, 2006. 38: p. 824-835.
Hopfe, C., et al. Exploration of using building performance simulation tools for conceptual building design. in IBPSA-NVL Conference. 2005. Delft, The Netherlands: TU-Delft.
Robinson, D., Energy model usage in building design: A qualitative assessment. Building Services Engineering Research & Technology, 1996. 17(2): p. 89-95.
Donn, M. A survey of users of thermal simulation programs.IBPSA. 1997. Czech Rep.
Praxis, Green Building Studio AEC Design Practice 2004, Final Report. Petaluma.
Pilgrim, M., et al., Towards the effecient use of simulation in building performance analysis: a user survey. Building Services Engineers, 2003. 24(3): p. 149-162.
Papamichael, K. and J. Protzen. The limits of Intelligence in Design. in 4th International Symposium on System Research, Informatics and Cybernetics. 1993. Baden, Germany.
DOE, U.S. BEST Directory. 2008 [cited 2008 15November] http://apps1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/tools_directory/.
Weisberg, H., J. Krosnick, and B. Bowen, An Introduction to Survey Research, Polling, and Data Analysis. 1996: Sage Publications, Inc;.
Augenbroe G., Trends in building simulation. Building & Environment, 2002. 37: p. 891- 902.
Hefley, W. and D. Murray. Intelligent user interfaces. in International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. 1993, Florida, US.
