test-day model; Covariance components; New Zealand
Abstract :
[en] In New Zealand, a large proportion of cows are currently crossbreds, mostly Holstein-Friesians (HF) x Jersey (JE). The genetic evaluation system for milk yields is considering the same additive genetic effects for all breeds. The objective was to model different additive effects according to parental breeds to obtain first estimates of correlations among breed-specific effects and to study the usefulness of this type of random regression test-day model. Estimates of (co) variance components for purebred HF and JE cattle in purebred herds were computed by using a single-breed model. This analysis showed differences between the 2 breeds, with a greater variability in the HF breed. (Co) variance components for purebred HF and JE and crossbred HF x JE cattle were then estimated by using a complete multibreed model in which computations of complete across-breed (co)variances were simplified by correlating only eigenvectors for HF and JE random regressions of the same order as obtained from the single-breed analysis. Parameter estimates differed more strongly than expected between the single-breed and multibreed analyses, especially for JE. This could be due to differences between animals and management in purebred and nonpurebred herds. In addition, the model used only partially accounted for heterosis. The multibreed analysis showed additive genetic differences between the HF and JE breeds, expressed as genetic correlations of additive effects in both breeds, especially in linear and quadratic Legendre polynomials (respectively, 0.807 and 0.604). The differences were small for overall milk production (0.926). Results showed that permanent environmental lactation curves were highly correlated across breeds; however, intraherd lactation curves were also affected by the breed-environment interaction. This result may indicate the existence of breed-specific competition effects that vary through the different lactation stages. In conclusion, a multibreed model similar to the one presented could optimally use the environmental and genetic parameters and provide breed-dependent additive breeding values. This model could also be a useful tool to evaluate crossbred dairy cattle populations like those in New Zealand. However, a routine evaluation would still require the development of an improved methodology. It would also be computationally very challenging because of the simultaneous presence of a large number of breeds.
Disciplines :
Genetics & genetic processes Animal production & animal husbandry
Ahlborn, G., and L. Dempfle. 1992. Genetic parameters for milk production and body size in New Zealand Holstein-Friesian and Jersey. Livest. Prod. Sci. 31:205-219.
Bryant, J. R., N. López-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick. 2007a. Environmental sensitivity in New Zealand dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1538-1547.
Bryant, J. R., N. López-Villalobos, J. E. Pryce, C. W. Holmes, D. L. Johnson, and D. J. Garrick. 2007b. Effect of environment on the expression of breed and heterosis effects for production traits. J. Dairy Sci. 90:1548-1553.
Garrick, D. J., B. L. Harris, and D. L. Johnson. 1997. The across-breed evaluation of dairy cattle in New Zealand. Proc. Assoc. Advmt. Anim. Breed Genet. 12:611-615.
Harris, B. L. 1994. Animal model for New Zealand dairy cattle evaluation. Proc. 1994 Interbull Mtg. 10:1-13.
Harris, B. L. 1995. Animal evaluation methods for New Zealand dairy cattle. Pages 1-28 in Livest. Improvement Corp. Tech. Rep. Livest. Improve. Corp., Hamilton, New Zealand.
Harris, B. L., and E. S. Kolver. 2001. Review of Holsteinization on intensive pastoral dairy farming in New Zealand. J. Dairy Sci. 84(E Suppl.):E56-E61.
Harris, B. L., A. M. Winkelman, D. L. Johnson, and W. A. Montgomerie. 2006. Development of a national production testday for New Zealand. Interbull Bull. 35:27-30.
Interbull. 2007. Description of National Genetic Evaluation Systems for dairy cattle as applied in different Interbull member countries. http://www-interbull.slu.se/national-ges-info2/framesida-ges.htm. Accessed Oct. 19, 2007.
Jensen, J., E. A. Mäntysaari, P. Madsen, and R. Thompson. 1997. Residual maximum likelihood estimation of (co)variance components in multivariate mixed linear models using average information. J. Ind. Soc. Agric. Stat. 49:215-236.
Johnson, D. L. 1996. Estimation of lactation yield from repeated measures of test day yields. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 56:16-18.
Legates, J. E. 1962. Heritability of fat yields in herds with different production levels. J. Dairy Sci. 45:990-993.
Lofgren, D. L., W. E. Vinson, R. E. Pearson, and R. L. Powell. 1985. Heritability of milk yield at different herd means and variance for production. J. Dairy Sci. 68:2737-2739.
Lopez-Villalobos, N., and D. J. Garrick. 1996. Profitability of rotational crossbreeding programmes in commercial dairy herds. Proc. N.Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 56:216-220.
Lopez-Villalobos, N., and D. J. Garrick. 1997. Crossbreeding for increased profitability. Proc. Massey Univ. Dairy Farmers Conf., New Zealand 49:164-172.
Lopez-Villalobos, N., and D. J. Garrick. 2002. Economic heterosis and breed complementarity for dairy cattle in New Zealand. Page 228 in Proc. 7th World Congr. Genet. Appl. Livest. Prod., Montpellier, France.
Lopez-Villalobos, N., D. J. Garrick, and C. W. Holmes. 2002. Genetic opportunities to improve milk value in New Zealand. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 62:90-94.
Lutaaya, E., I. Misztal, J. W. Mabry, T. Short, H. H. Timm, and R. Holzbauer. 2001. Genetic parameter estimates from joint evaluation of purebreds and crossbreds in swine using the crossbred model. J. Anim. Sci. 79:3002-3007.
Meyer, K. 1997. An 'average information' restricted maximum likelihood algorithm for estimating reduced rank genetic covariance matrices or covariance functions for animal models with equal design matrices. Genet. Sel. Evol. 29:97-116.
Misztal, I., T. Strabel, J. Jamrozik, E. A. Mäntysaari, and T. H. E. Meuwissen. 2000. Strategies for estimating the parameters needed for different test-day models. J. Dairy Sci. 83:1125-1134.
Montgomerie, W. A. 2002. Experiences with dairy cattle crossbreeding in New Zealand. Pages 1-12 in 53rd Annu. Mtg. Eur. Assoc. Anim. Prod., Cairo, Egypt. http://www.aeu.org.nz/news/EAAP-Xbreed-Sept2002.PDF Accessed Oct. 19, 2007.
Newman, S., A. Reverter, and D. J. Johnston. 2002. Purebred-crossbred performance and genetic evaluation of postweaning growth and carcass traits in Bos indicus x Bos taurus crosses in Australia. J. Anim. Sci. 80:1801-1808.
Roso, V. M., F. S. Schenkel, S. P. Miller, and J. W. Wilton. 2005. Additive, dominance, and epistatic loss effects on preweaning weight gain of crossbred beef cattle from different Bos taurus breeds. J. Anim. Sci. 83:1780-1787.
Touchberry, R. W. 1992. Crossbreeding effects in dairy cattle: The Illinois experiment, 1949 to 1969. J. Dairy Sci. 75:640-667.
VanRaden, P. M., and A. H. Sanders. 2001. Economic merit of crossbred and purebred US dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1036-1044.
Wei, M., and J. H. J. van der Werf. 1995. Genetic correlation and heritabilities for purebred and crossbred performance in poultry egg production traits. J. Anim. Sci. 73:2220-2226.
Zumbach, B., I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, J. Holl, W. Herring, and T. Long. 2007. Genetic correlations between two strains of Durocs and crossbreds from differing production environments for slaughter traits. J. Anim. Sci. 85:901-908.